Efficacy of Primary Debulking Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage IV Ovarian Cancer

NCT ID: NCT05371301

Last Updated: 2022-05-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-16

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is mostly diagnosed at late stage (III/IV), and the standard treatment for ovarian cancer includes primary debulking surgery and platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. However, scholars suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be used to reduce the tumor load and control the patient's condition. The aim of this study is to verify the efficacy of primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in women. Due to the insidious onset and the lack of effective early diagnosis measures, about 70% of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer are already in FIGO stage III-IV at the time of diagnosis. With extensive tumor dissemination and metastasis, the 5-year survival rate of EOC patients is only about 30-40%.

Currently, the standard treatment for ovarian cancer remains to include primary debulking surgery(PDS) and platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Despite the lack of evidence from prospective randomized controlled studies, evidence invariably shows that satisfactory debulking surgery improves survival prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer and that this benefit is significantly associated with the amount of residual lesion.

How to increase the proportion of patients with satisfactory tumor reduction (residual lesions \<1 cm) has long been a pressing issue for gynecologic oncologists. However, because ovarian cancer lesions are mainly disseminated in the pelvic cavity, the extent of surgery to achieve satisfactory reduction is often large and difficult to be tolerated for some patients. At the same time, due to the large initial tumor or the limited treatment level, some patients are unable to obtain satisfactory cytoreduction. Therefore, some scholars suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) can be used to reduce the tumor load and control the patient's condition, followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS), called NACT-IDS treatment model.

Whether the NACT-IDS treatment model can be used as a conventional alternative to PDS has been controversial. The foundation for NACT-IDS was laid by two multicenter randomized controlled phase III clinical trials, EORTC 55971 and CHORUS. Both studies showed that the application of NACT in patients with advanced ovarian cancer resulted in a higher proportion of satisfactory cytoreduction and lower postoperative complications and mortality while ensuring a similar prognosis. However, the two studies mentioned above have been questioned by some scholars because of the lower median operative time, lower percentage of satisfactory cytoreduction, and lower patient prognosis than the international general level. Meanwhile, another phase III randomized controlled clinical trial, JCOG0602, was a non-inferiority trial, and the results did not confirm that NACT was not inferior to PDS. Therefore, at present, NCCN guidelines recommend that PDS remains the first choice for most patients.

At present, there are no relevant clinical trials comparing the impact of PDS with NACT on the prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer. In this study, investigators propose to assess the resectability of patients with abdominopelvic lesions using the Suidan standard resectability prediction model based on the evaluation of WB-DWI/MRI. In patients of stage IV ovarian cancer with resectable abdominopelvic lesions, the prognostic impact of PDS and NACT will be compared prospectively and randomly, with the aim of providing a new decision basis for the treatment of patients with stage IV ovarian cancer.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ovarian Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NACT-IDS

For patients whoes WB-DWI/MRI Suidan Standard Evaluation≄4 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy: platinum-based combination regimen 3 courses

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Paclitaxel, Carboplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 iv d1 followed by Carboplatin(AUC=5) iv d1

debulking surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Remove all visible tumors and any other tissues or organs where tumor may have spread, which may include:

Uterus Fallopian tubes Omentum (tissue that covers the stomach, large intestine and other abdominal organs) Lymph nodes Diaphragm Part of the large bowel Spleen Parts of the liver

PDS

For patients whoes WB-DWI/MRI Suidan Standard Evaluation\<4

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

debulking surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Remove all visible tumors and any other tissues or organs where tumor may have spread, which may include:

Uterus Fallopian tubes Omentum (tissue that covers the stomach, large intestine and other abdominal organs) Lymph nodes Diaphragm Part of the large bowel Spleen Parts of the liver

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Paclitaxel, Carboplatin

Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 iv d1 followed by Carboplatin(AUC=5) iv d1

Intervention Type DRUG

debulking surgery

Remove all visible tumors and any other tissues or organs where tumor may have spread, which may include:

Uterus Fallopian tubes Omentum (tissue that covers the stomach, large intestine and other abdominal organs) Lymph nodes Diaphragm Part of the large bowel Spleen Parts of the liver

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female patients over 18 years of age.
* ECOG 0-2
* Clinically confirmed epithelial ovarian or fallopian-tube cancer or primary peritoneal cancer
* FIGO2014 stage III/IV
* Sign the informed consent form
* Good compliance and agree to cooperate with survival follow-up

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with large abdominal masses or other reasons for not being able to tolerate surgical treatment
* Patients with severe medical comorbidities that cannot be corrected in the short term and are not suitable for tumor cytoreductive surgery
* Patients with contraindications to chemotherapy
* Patients with a history of psychotropic substance abuse and unable to quit or patients with mental disorders
* Patients with serious safety hazards or concomitant diseases that, in the judgment of the institution, would affect the patient's ability to complete the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fudan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Xiaohua Wu MD

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Xiaohua Wu, PhD&MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fudan university shanghai cancer center, Deparment of gynecologic oncology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fudan university shanghai cancer center, Deparment of gynecologic oncology

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Xiaohua Wu, PhD&MD

Role: CONTACT

86-21-64175590 ext. 88217

Zheng Feng, PhD

Role: CONTACT

86-18121299572

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Xiaohua Wu, PhD&MD

Role: primary

86-21-64175590 ext. 88217

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FUSCC-GYN-20200816

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.