Therapeutic Monitoring of Beta-lactams in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis
NCT ID: NCT07270523
Last Updated: 2025-12-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
198 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-01
2029-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: To evaluate whether individualized β-lactam dosing guided by TDM reduces time to full clinical recovery compared with standard dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis.
Methods: OPTIBETA is a pragmatic, randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial to be conducted at a tertiary hospital in Spain. Adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the intensive care unit or infectious diseases ward with sepsis will be included. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either a TDM-guided dosing arm (dose adjustments according to PK/PD targets) or a standard dosing arm. Clinical, microbiological, and pharmacological outcomes will be collected. The primary endpoint is time to complete clinical cure. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, microbiological cure, ICU and hospital length of stay, adverse events, and achievement of PK/PD targets. The estimated sample size is 198 patients.
Expected results: We hypothesize that TDM-guided dosing will reduce time to clinical cure, improve overall outcomes, and decrease adverse events compared with standard dosing.
Conclusions: OPTIBETA will provide high-quality evidence on the role of β-lactam TDM in critically ill septic patients and may support its inclusion in antimicrobial stewardship programs.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Optimization of Ceftazidime Regimen in Critical Care
NCT07085624
Neurotoxicity Evaluation of Beta-lactams in Intensive Care Unit and Identification of the Risk Factors
NCT03628300
Extracorporeal Therapy and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
NCT07287813
The Distribution of Plasma Drug Concentrations of Beta-lactam Antibiotics in Intensive Care Unit Patients
NCT02446392
Beta-lactam Intermittent Versus Continuous Infusion and Combination Antibiotic Therapy in Sepsis
NCT05681442
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) applied to beta-lactam antibiotics allows for individualized dosage adjustment based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets. Despite strong observational evidence supporting this strategy, its clinical implementation remains limited due to technical, organizational, and economic barriers, and the absence of pragmatic randomized clinical trials makes it difficult to establish its true impact on healthcare practice.
In this context, the OPTIBETA project hypothesizes that personalized dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics guided by MDT improves time to clinical cure compared to standard dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis. The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of individualized dosing based on MDT versus the conventional regimen in terms of reducing the time to complete clinical cure.
Hypothesis:
The administration of beta-lactam antibiotics adjusted to PK/PD targets in critically ill patients with sepsis based on plasma level determination improves clinical and microbiological cure compared to standard dosing.
Objectives:
The overall objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of personalized dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics based on TDM, compared to standard dosing, in critically ill patients with sepsis.
* Primary objective Evaluate whether individualized dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics based on pharmacokinetic monitoring and achievement of PK/PD targets is superior to standard dosing in terms of reducing the time to complete clinical cure (resolution of signs and symptoms of infection, functional recovery, baseline or improved SOFA score (≤2 points), and absence of need for new antibiotics).
* Secondary objectives
* To evaluate the overall clinical efficacy of personalized dosing versus conventional dosing using variables such as: survival rate, clinical and microbiological cure rate, total length of hospital stay, number of days free of life-support therapies (vasopressors, renal replacement therapies, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)).
* Analyze the emergence of antimicrobial resistance in both groups.
* Compare the incidence of adverse effects (nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and neurotoxicity) between the personalized dosing group and the control group.
* Determine the percentage of patients who achieve the established PK/PD targets: ≥100% fT \> MIC or ≥100% fT \> 4×MIC.
* Study the influence of clinical variables (type of infection, microorganism involved, severity of clinical symptoms, etc.) on the probability of achieving PK/PD targets.
* Evaluate the relationship between the total concentration and the free fraction of the antibiotic, and its impact on achieving the desired PK/PD parameters.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
* Intervention: individualized dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics guided by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with adjustment according to pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets.
* Control: standard dosing based on clinical guidelines, without individualized adjustment.
The study will be open-label, although the evaluators of clinical and microbiological outcomes will be blinded to treatment assignment in order to reduce observation bias.
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group (individualized dosing based on therapeutic monitoring)
Patients will receive individualized dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics based on therapeutic monitoring. Total and free plasma concentrations will be determined 48 hours after the start of antibiotic therapy and subsequently every 4-5 days, or sooner if there is a significant clinical change. Dosage adjustments will be made to achieve the defined PK/PD targets:
* Standard: ≥100% fT \> MIC.
* Infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens, increased renal clearance, or immunosuppression: ≥100% fT \> 4×MIC.
Concentrations will be interpreted in relation to the actual MIC of the identified pathogen or, failing that, to the ECOFF values defined by EUCAST.
Individualized dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics based on therapeutic monitoring
In the intervention group, plasma levels will be determined 48 hours after the start of antibiotic treatment and subsequently every 4-5 days, with a pharmacotherapeutic report and dosage adjustment within \<24 hours. In the control group, samples will be stored at -80 °C and analyzed at the end of the study, with no impact on clinical practice.
Plasma concentrations of beta-lactam antibiotics will be determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using validated commercial kits, which allow simultaneous quantification of several drugs in this group with reduced processing times and feasible implementation in hospital routine.
Patients will be evaluated weekly until hospital discharge, death, or completion of antibiotic treatment. Clinical progression, inflammatory markers, emergence of resistance, adverse effects, and clinical and microbiological outcomes will be recorded.
Control group (usual dosage):
Patients will receive the usual dosage of beta-lactam antibiotics following the recommendations of clinical guidelines and hospital protocols, without individualized adjustment based on MDT. Plasma samples will also be collected, but will be stored for deferred analysis at the end of the study, with no impact on clinical management.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Individualized dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics based on therapeutic monitoring
In the intervention group, plasma levels will be determined 48 hours after the start of antibiotic treatment and subsequently every 4-5 days, with a pharmacotherapeutic report and dosage adjustment within \<24 hours. In the control group, samples will be stored at -80 °C and analyzed at the end of the study, with no impact on clinical practice.
Plasma concentrations of beta-lactam antibiotics will be determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using validated commercial kits, which allow simultaneous quantification of several drugs in this group with reduced processing times and feasible implementation in hospital routine.
Patients will be evaluated weekly until hospital discharge, death, or completion of antibiotic treatment. Clinical progression, inflammatory markers, emergence of resistance, adverse effects, and clinical and microbiological outcomes will be recorded.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of sepsis according to Sepsis-3 (SOFA ≥2).
* Initiation of treatment with beta-lactam antibiotics.
* Informed consent signed by the patient or their legal representative within the first 48 hours after the start of antibiotic therapy.
Exclusion Criteria
* Known hypersensitivity to beta-lactams.
* Discontinuation of antibiotic treatment before the first TDM determination.
* Simultaneous participation in another clinical trial.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela
UNKNOWN
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Manuel Ángel Gómez-Ríos
Anesthesiologist
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Manuel A Gómez-Rios, Anesthesiologist
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Suarez D, Ferrer R, Artigas A, Azkarate I, Garnacho-Montero J, Goma G, Levy MM, Ruiz JC; Edusepsis Study Group. Cost-effectiveness of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign protocol for severe sepsis: a prospective nation-wide study in Spain. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Mar;37(3):444-52. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2102-3. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 29;369(9):840-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208623. No abstract available.
Sakr Y, Jaschinski U, Wittebole X, Szakmany T, Lipman J, Namendys-Silva SA, Martin-Loeches I, Leone M, Lupu MN, Vincent JL; ICON Investigators. Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Worldwide Data From the Intensive Care over Nations Audit. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 19;5(12):ofy313. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy313. eCollection 2018 Dec.
Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, Colombara DV, Ikuta KS, Kissoon N, Finfer S, Fleischmann-Struzek C, Machado FR, Reinhart KK, Rowan K, Seymour CW, Watson RS, West TE, Marinho F, Hay SI, Lozano R, Lopez AD, Angus DC, Murray CJL, Naghavi M. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
Perner A, Gordon AC, De Backer D, Dimopoulos G, Russell JA, Lipman J, Jensen JU, Myburgh J, Singer M, Bellomo R, Walsh T. Sepsis: frontiers in diagnosis, resuscitation and antibiotic therapy. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):1958-1969. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4577-z. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
Reinhart K, Daniels R, Kissoon N, Machado FR, Schachter RD, Finfer S. Recognizing Sepsis as a Global Health Priority - A WHO Resolution. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):414-417. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1707170. Epub 2017 Jun 28. No abstract available.
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OPTIBETA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.