Mechanistic Study of Personalized rTMS in Chronic Pain

NCT ID: NCT07266103

Last Updated: 2025-12-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-02-01

Study Completion Date

2028-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Previous research has demonstrated that repetitive magnetic brain stimulation can be an effective adjunctive treatment for several conditions, including chronic pain. However, current stimulation protocols are typically standardized and do not account for individual variability in brain function. This uniform, one-size-fits-all approach results in only about 40% of patients experiencing meaningful clinical benefit, while the remainder show little to no improvement. To address this limitation, the present study will investigate how magnetic stimulation can be tailored to individuals with chronic pain. By analyzing each participant's brain signals prior to treatment, we aim to personalize stimulation parameters to better match individual neural characteristics and potentially enhance therapeutic outcomes. The design of this study builds directly on the findings of a previous clinical trial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study builds directly on previous clinical findings identifying four cortical targets-primary motor cortex (M1), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the posterior insula (PSI)-as exhibiting neurophysiological properties potentially useful for guiding individualized repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) target selection. Earlier results demonstrated that chronic pain patients with low alpha-band intertrial coherence (ITC) over M1 were more likely to respond to stimulation of M1, whereas patients with high alpha-band ITC showed a greater likelihood of responding to stimulation of PSI, ACC or DLPFC. These findings suggest that specific electroencephalography (EEG) connectivity markers may help predict the cortical target most likely to provide therapeutic benefit for an individual patient.

Building on this evidence, the present trial will classify participants according to their pre-treatment transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) connectivity profiles and assign treatment to the cortical region with the highest predicted probability of clinical response.

A total of 90 patients with chronic pain will be enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, two-parallel-arm clinical trial comparing the analgesic effects of individualized target selection with those of the standard rTMS protocol. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to:

* Individualized targeting, in which the rTMS site is selected based on each participant's TMS-EEG connectivity profile
* Standard stimulation, representing the conventional rTMS approach for pain relief.

At baseline, participants will complete standardized questionnaires and undergo neurophysiological assessments, including single-pulse TMS-EEG for target classification. The induction phase will then begin, consisting of five consecutive daily rTMS sessions delivered Monday through Friday. Each session lasts 30 minutes, including 15 minutes of active stimulation.

The induction phase will be followed by a 7-week maintenance phase, during which participants receive one rTMS session per week (seven sessions in total). At the end of the maintenance phase, all outcome measures will be reassessed to evaluate treatment efficacy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

When 50% of inclusion is completed, a preplanned interim futility analysis is scheduled to examine safety and the main outcome.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active Comparator : Classical rTMS

The patients will receive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation according to the classical treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Classical repetitive trancranial magnetic stimulation to M1

Intervention Type DEVICE

The rTMS intervention consists of 10-Hz rTMS. Thirty trains of ten seconds with an interval of twenty seconds between trains will be delivered, as traditionally performed. Each train includes 100 pulses, and the total number of pulses will be 3,000 given in 15 minutes.

Experimental: Personalized Target Arm

The patients will receive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to target showing the optimal connectivity during the TMS-EEG assessment one week before starting the treatment

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Personalized Target Arm

Intervention Type DEVICE

The rTMS intervention consists of 10-Hz rTMS. Thirty trains of ten seconds will be delivered with an interval of twenty seconds between trains. Each train includes 100 pulses, and the total number of pulses will be 3,000 given in 15 minutes. The rTMS will be delivered to the optimal target

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Classical repetitive trancranial magnetic stimulation to M1

The rTMS intervention consists of 10-Hz rTMS. Thirty trains of ten seconds with an interval of twenty seconds between trains will be delivered, as traditionally performed. Each train includes 100 pulses, and the total number of pulses will be 3,000 given in 15 minutes.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Personalized Target Arm

The rTMS intervention consists of 10-Hz rTMS. Thirty trains of ten seconds will be delivered with an interval of twenty seconds between trains. Each train includes 100 pulses, and the total number of pulses will be 3,000 given in 15 minutes. The rTMS will be delivered to the optimal target

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Presence of chronic pain (present most of the days for more than 3 months).
* Pain with a mean pain intensity between 3-9 on a 0-10 pain scale (where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst pain imaginable).
* Speak and understand English or Danish

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant or breastfeeding
* Current uncontrolled major depression as the main diagnosis
* Current history of substance abuse
* Lack of ability to cooperate, to fully understand the protocol or any difficulty in filling out questionnaires (e.g., due to language or cognitive problems)
* Formal contraindications to TMS application (presence of epilepsy, cranial implanted ferromagnetic devices, e.g., intracranial neurostimulator or cochlear implants, tattoos with metal ink on the face or permanent make up with metal in the face )
* Unable to answer the "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Adult Safety Screen" screening questionnaire.
* Participation in other research protocols within 1 month before the inclusion.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aalborg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Enrico De Martino

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Enrico De Martino

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Aalborg University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Enrico De Martino, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+4591811183

Daniel Ciampi De Andrade, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

N-20230076-4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

RTMS for Treatment of Pain and Craving
NCT03310138 COMPLETED PHASE2
rTMS for Relieving Chronic OA Pain
NCT05097729 WITHDRAWN NA
Pain and Major Depressive Disorder
NCT04556890 RECRUITING NA