Personalized Treatment by rTMS in Chronic Pain - Study2

NCT ID: NCT07247552

Last Updated: 2025-12-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-01

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Previous research has shown the effectiveness of magnetic stimulation of the brain as a supplemental treatment for various conditions, such as depression and chronic pain. However, the application of magnetic stimulation has been standardized across patients without considering individual differences. This one-size-fits-all approach results in only half of the patients benefiting from the treatment, with the other half seeing no improvement in their symptoms. Therefore, a study on individuals with chronic pain will be performed to explore how magnetic stimulation treatments can be tailored to each person. This will involve analysing brain signal measurements before the start of the therapy and adjusting/personalizing the magnetic stimulations to each individual person.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective, single-arm interventional study designed to evaluate the predictive value of a neurophysiological biomarker for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) response in chronic pain patients. The project aims to test if the effects of non-pharmacological, non-invasive pain treatment can be enhanced by employing brain connectivity information to guide the application of rTMS. Previous efficacy and safety trials have supported that current best practice for rTMS for pain relief in chronic pain patients, is applied to one cortical area: primary motor cortex (M1). However, only around 50% respond to the treatment. Since there is no current strategy to know which patient will respond to treatment, patients with chronic pain end up undergoing trial and error strategies, which delay their improvement. This is actually not different from challenges related to pharmacological treatment, where each medication only relieves pain in 30-40% of patients, and the choice of each medication is based on "trial-and-error basis".

Several strategies currently aim to provide a more individualized strategy for choosing analgesic interventions based on patient-related information. To allow for the design of efficacy trials in the future, the present project is based on a proof-of-concept, mechanistic design. It will employ M1 rTMS stimulation for pain reduction. However, based on everyone's brain signals as read by EEG recorded before the start of the treatment it will be determined whether the patient is most likely to respond or not. Therefore, before receiving a full rTMS treatment, patients will undergo a neurophysiological screening session using single-pulse TMS-EEG. Single-pulse TMS and EEG have been routinely used in the clinic as a part of the neurophysiological assessment of patients for decades but have not yet been used in the association as an attempt to try to guide who will become a responder to the treatment. In the screening session, single pulses TMS will be applied to the primary network hub used as current best-practice in therapeutic rTMS: M1. Concomitantly, the EEG oscillatory activity of this cortical area will be recorded, and the brain connectivity state will be assessed. By using information derived from a patient´s brain connectivity state using transcranial magnetic stimulation with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG), it will be determined if the participant is most likely to respond or not. High oscillatory activity is expected to result in becoming a non-responder.

A total of 90 subjects with chronic pain will be included in a double-blind, randomized two parallel-arm study aiming to be able to accurately predict who will become a responder and a non-responder based on high oscillatory activity.

In the initial baseline measurement, the subjects will fill out questionnaires and undergo neurophysiological assessments which include rest EEG, TMS-EEG of M1, rTMS-EEG, followed by a repetition of TMS-EEG of M1 and rest EEG. After this baseline measurement, the subjects will receive daily rTMS sessions targeting M1 (called induction phase) for 5 consecutive days (Monday to Friday). Each of the 5 daily stimulations will last 30 minutes, of which 15 minutes will be under treatment.

The induction phase will be followed by a 7-week maintenance phase, with 1 rTMS session per week (totalling 7 rTMS sessions). At the end of the maintenance phase, primary and secondary outcomes (questionnaires) will be collected to investigate the efficacy of the rTMS treatments. These questionnaires will also be sent to participants 12 weeks following end of treatment. A random subsample of 30 participants will be asked if they would like to participate in a second 3-hour neurophysiological assessment to investigate the changes in brain connectivity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Patients and investigators are blinded to the prediction of whether a participant is expected to become a responder or non-responder.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Classical rTMS to M1

This is a prospective, single-arm interventional study designed to evaluate the predictive value of a neurophysiological biomarker for rTMS response in chronic pain patients. Patients will be allocated to two groups according to their baseline M1 connectivity at baseline in a 1:1 proportion. Patients with "low" connectivity will be compared to controls having "high" connectivity. All patients will receive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the primary cortex (M1). Low connectivity will be defined by TMS-EEG evoked responses. Responses to a single pulse of TMS delivered to M1 before therapy. TMS-EEG responses will be analysed by phase- and power-based metrics such as global mean field power and inter-trial coherence in the alpha band, according to previous studies. The study main hypothesis is that pre-therapy M1 low connectivity is a predictor of response to M1 rTMS.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

rTMS to M1

Intervention Type DEVICE

• The rTMS intervention consists of 10-Hz rTMS. Thirty trains of ten seconds with an interval of twenty seconds between trains will be delivered, as traditionally performed. Each train includes 100 pulses, and the total number of pulses will be 3,000 given in 15 minutes. All patients will receive 14 sessions of rTMS.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

rTMS to M1

• The rTMS intervention consists of 10-Hz rTMS. Thirty trains of ten seconds with an interval of twenty seconds between trains will be delivered, as traditionally performed. Each train includes 100 pulses, and the total number of pulses will be 3,000 given in 15 minutes. All patients will receive 14 sessions of rTMS.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Presence of chronic pain (present most of the days for more than 3 months).
* Pain with a mean pain intensity between 3-9 on a 0-10 pain scale (where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst pain imaginable).
* Speak and understand English or Danish

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant or breastfeeding
* Current uncontrolled major depression as the main diagnosis
* Current history of substance abuse
* Lack of ability to cooperate, to fully understand the protocol or any difficulty in filling out questionnaires (e.g., due to language or cognitive problems)
* Formal contraindications to TMS application (presence of epilepsy, cranial implanted ferromagnetic devices, e.g., intracranial neurostimulator or cochlear implants, tattoos with metal ink on the face or permanent make up with metal in the face )
* Unable to answer the "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Adult Safety Screen" screening questionnaire.
* Participation in other research protocols within 1 month before the inclusion.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aalborg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Margit Midtgaard Bach

Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Margit M Bach, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Aalborg University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aalborg University

Gistrup, , Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Margit M Bach

Role: CONTACT

+45 9137 3170

Daniel C de Andrade

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Margit M Bach, Dr

Role: primary

+45 9137 3170

Daniel C de Andrade, Prof

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

N-20230076-3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pain and Major Depressive Disorder
NCT04556890 RECRUITING NA
RTMS for Treatment of Pain and Craving
NCT03310138 COMPLETED PHASE2