Efficiency of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Sessions After a Successful 3 Week-treatment in Fibromyalgia
NCT ID: NCT01942538
Last Updated: 2019-02-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
78 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-09-30
2017-07-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Relief of Fibromyalgia Pain
NCT03658694
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Fibromyalgia
NCT03909009
Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Pain
NCT03259451
Deep rTMS (H-coil) for Neuropathic Pain or Fibromyalgia
NCT06250491
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Central Neuropathic Pain
NCT02386969
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
rTMS-rTMS
subjects receiving real rTMS treatment and real rTMS maintenance sessions
rTMS
one session : 20 runs of 10 seconds high frequency stimulation(10Hz) and 50 seconds pause - power equivalent to 90% of the motor threshold
sham - sham
subjects receiving sham treatment and presenting a clinical improvement : they will be submitted to sham maintenance sessions
sham rTMS
same session as defined with the real rTMS, but with a coil not delivering magnetic field.
rTMS-sham
subjects receiving sham rTMS maintenance sessions after successful real rTMS treatment
rTMS
one session : 20 runs of 10 seconds high frequency stimulation(10Hz) and 50 seconds pause - power equivalent to 90% of the motor threshold
sham rTMS
same session as defined with the real rTMS, but with a coil not delivering magnetic field.
rTMS
real rTMS for 3 weeks but without clinical improvement
rTMS
one session : 20 runs of 10 seconds high frequency stimulation(10Hz) and 50 seconds pause - power equivalent to 90% of the motor threshold
sham
sham treatment for 3 weeks without clinical improvement
sham rTMS
same session as defined with the real rTMS, but with a coil not delivering magnetic field.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
rTMS
one session : 20 runs of 10 seconds high frequency stimulation(10Hz) and 50 seconds pause - power equivalent to 90% of the motor threshold
sham rTMS
same session as defined with the real rTMS, but with a coil not delivering magnetic field.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* painful state for more than six months,
* visual analogic scale evaluation \> or = 5,
* age between 18 and 70,
* no modification in therapeutic treatment one month before and during the protocol
* presence of actual or prior antalgic chronic treatment : pregabalin, duloxetine, milnacipran, gabapentin, venlafaxine, laroxyl, grade 1 or 2 antalgic
* residence in Limoges or the periphery, or the ability to come to the hospital for the treatment
Exclusion Criteria
* active epilepsy,
* previous cerebral traumatism, or cerebral surgery, intra-cranial hyper tension,
* pacemaker, metallic pieces in the brain, cochlear ocular implant, or any metallic material contra indicating magnetic resonance imaging.
* clozapine, bupropion, methadon, theophyllin, or other non chemical antalgic technic established during the previous month(kinesitherapy, relaxation, hypnosis...),
* pregnancy, or administrative and judiciary protection, absence of health insurance.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Esquirol
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jean-Christophe Dumont
Medical Doctor, Assistant in Rheumatologia Service CHU Limoges
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jean-Christophe Dumont, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU Dupuytren CH Esquirol
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre Hospitalier Esquirol
Limoges, , France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
Limoges, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ciobanu C, Girard M, Marin B, Labrunie A, Malauzat D. rTMS for pharmacoresistant major depression in the clinical setting of a psychiatric hospital: effectiveness and effects of age. J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 5;150(2):677-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.03.024. Epub 2013 May 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013-A00820-45
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.