Efficiency of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Sessions After a Successful 3 Week-treatment in Fibromyalgia

NCT ID: NCT01942538

Last Updated: 2019-02-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

78 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2017-07-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Maintenance rTMS sessions after a successful 3week-rTMS treatment for subjects with fibromyalgia may maintain the clinical improvement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In a previous pilot study, a 3 week treatment with rTMS in fibromyalgia subjects induced a 40% improvement of pain feeling. Three months later, the pain level was still significantly reduced in comparison with the beginning of the treatment, but the clinical improvement was less than at the end of the treatment. We thus propose to realize real or sham rTMS sessions at 3 weeks interval during 6 months with subjects presenting a significant clinical improvement after a 3 week-rTMS or sham treatment to evaluate the response maintenance.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fibromyalgia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

rTMS-rTMS

subjects receiving real rTMS treatment and real rTMS maintenance sessions

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rTMS

Intervention Type DEVICE

one session : 20 runs of 10 seconds high frequency stimulation(10Hz) and 50 seconds pause - power equivalent to 90% of the motor threshold

sham - sham

subjects receiving sham treatment and presenting a clinical improvement : they will be submitted to sham maintenance sessions

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

sham rTMS

Intervention Type DEVICE

same session as defined with the real rTMS, but with a coil not delivering magnetic field.

rTMS-sham

subjects receiving sham rTMS maintenance sessions after successful real rTMS treatment

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

rTMS

Intervention Type DEVICE

one session : 20 runs of 10 seconds high frequency stimulation(10Hz) and 50 seconds pause - power equivalent to 90% of the motor threshold

sham rTMS

Intervention Type DEVICE

same session as defined with the real rTMS, but with a coil not delivering magnetic field.

rTMS

real rTMS for 3 weeks but without clinical improvement

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rTMS

Intervention Type DEVICE

one session : 20 runs of 10 seconds high frequency stimulation(10Hz) and 50 seconds pause - power equivalent to 90% of the motor threshold

sham

sham treatment for 3 weeks without clinical improvement

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

sham rTMS

Intervention Type DEVICE

same session as defined with the real rTMS, but with a coil not delivering magnetic field.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

rTMS

one session : 20 runs of 10 seconds high frequency stimulation(10Hz) and 50 seconds pause - power equivalent to 90% of the motor threshold

Intervention Type DEVICE

sham rTMS

same session as defined with the real rTMS, but with a coil not delivering magnetic field.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* presence of the criteria from the American College of Rheumatology (2010)for fibromyalgia diagnosis,
* painful state for more than six months,
* visual analogic scale evaluation \> or = 5,
* age between 18 and 70,
* no modification in therapeutic treatment one month before and during the protocol
* presence of actual or prior antalgic chronic treatment : pregabalin, duloxetine, milnacipran, gabapentin, venlafaxine, laroxyl, grade 1 or 2 antalgic
* residence in Limoges or the periphery, or the ability to come to the hospital for the treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* presence of non stabilized psychiatric comorbidity (personality trouble, addiction, suicide attempt, non controlled affective trouble),
* active epilepsy,
* previous cerebral traumatism, or cerebral surgery, intra-cranial hyper tension,
* pacemaker, metallic pieces in the brain, cochlear ocular implant, or any metallic material contra indicating magnetic resonance imaging.
* clozapine, bupropion, methadon, theophyllin, or other non chemical antalgic technic established during the previous month(kinesitherapy, relaxation, hypnosis...),
* pregnancy, or administrative and judiciary protection, absence of health insurance.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Esquirol

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jean-Christophe Dumont

Medical Doctor, Assistant in Rheumatologia Service CHU Limoges

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean-Christophe Dumont, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Dupuytren CH Esquirol

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier Esquirol

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ciobanu C, Girard M, Marin B, Labrunie A, Malauzat D. rTMS for pharmacoresistant major depression in the clinical setting of a psychiatric hospital: effectiveness and effects of age. J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 5;150(2):677-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.03.024. Epub 2013 May 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23673085 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-A00820-45

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

rTMS for Neuroenhancement
NCT06214871 RECRUITING NA