Assessment of a New Traction Device in Submucosal Dissection of Colorectal Lesions
NCT ID: NCT07263997
Last Updated: 2025-12-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-12-15
2027-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Piece-meal mucosectomy is the standard technique in Europe and the USA for lesions larger than 2 cm. It has certain advantages, such as its ease of learning, low morbidity and speed of execution. However, it has one major disadvantage, namely the low rate of monobloc resection and R0 for lesions larger than 2 cm.
Submucosal dissection (SMD) has become the standard technique for endoscopic resection of superficial colorectal lesions larger than 2 cm, particularly if the lesion presents a risk of superficial degeneration. Unlike mucosectomy, this technique allows for monobloc resection targeting R0 for all types of superficial lesions without size limitations, enabling histological analysis without data loss and with a recurrence rate of less than 2%.
However, there are numerous disadvantages to dissection:
* SMD is more difficult than mucosectomy, with a long learning curve, limiting its use to expert centres.
* The morbidity of dissection is higher than that of mucosectomy, with a risk of perforation of 4% vs. 1%.
* The procedure takes on average three times longer than mucosectomy.
From a technical standpoint, various methods have been described to facilitate the procedure, in particular traction using clips and elastic bands, which is the most widely used method in France.
Micro-Tech offers a new traction device, SureTrac, which is designed to perform single or multi-polar traction and to adjust the intensity of traction during dissection. The product is CE marked but has not yet been distributed in France. No data are currently available in the literature on this product other than a case report submitted for publication. A pilot study conducted by an expert centre is therefore necessary. This is why this study is being initiated.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Rectal Tumor Margin Using Confocal Endomicroscopy and Comparison to Histopathology
NCT01887509
The Efficacy and Safety of a Hybrid Hemostatic Device (ClearCoajet)
NCT05737017
Outcomes of Perforation After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
NCT05728710
Predictive Factors for Failure or Success of Endoscopic Treatment of Superficial Colorectal Tumors
NCT03470883
Histological Prediction and Choice of the Resection Strategy in Front of a Colorectal Lesion > 2 cm: Prospective Comparison of Endoscopic Characterization, Non-targeted and Targeted Biopsies
NCT04482491
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The larger the size of the colonic lesion, the higher the risk of degeneration, and the more difficult and risky endoscopic resection becomes. Nevertheless, this risk is still lower than that of surgery, which has a morbidity rate of 24%.
Piece-meal mucosectomy is the standard technique in Europe and the USA for lesions larger than 2 cm. It has certain advantages, such as its ease of learning, low morbidity and speed of execution. However, it has one major disadvantage, namely the low rate of monobloc resection and R0 for lesions larger than 2 cm. In this indication, it is therefore debatable because the risk of recurrence is 15%, or even 30% for lesions larger than 4 cm. Histological analysis is potentially less reliable, with the risk of losing histological fragments and only partially examining the specimens. This can potentially bias the decision to perform additional surgery or follow-up. Finally, the need to perform repeated colonoscopies in the event of recurrence or during monitoring leads to additional costs and a loss of patient follow-up.
Submucosal dissection (SMD) has become the standard technique for endoscopic resection of superficial colorectal lesions larger than 2 cm, particularly if the lesion presents a risk of superficial degeneration. Unlike mucosectomy, this technique allows for monobloc resection targeting R0 for all types of superficial lesions without size limitations, enabling histological analysis without data loss and with a recurrence rate of less than 2%.
However, there are numerous disadvantages to dissection:
* SMD is more difficult than mucosectomy, with a long learning curve, limiting its use to expert centres.
* The morbidity of dissection is higher than that of mucosectomy, with a risk of perforation of 4% vs. 1%.
* The procedure takes on average three times longer than mucosectomy.
From a technical standpoint, various methods have been described to facilitate the procedure, in particular traction using clips and elastic bands, which is the most widely used method in France. This involves pulling the lesion using a clip and elastic band to open up the submucosal layer and facilitate dissection. Certain variations have been described, such as multi-traction and adaptive traction, which are performed using non-dedicated, off-label devices (haemostatic clip and dental elastic band).
Micro-Tech offers a new traction device, SureTrac, which is designed to perform single or multi-polar traction and to adjust the intensity of traction during dissection. The product is CE marked but has not yet been distributed in France. No data are currently available in the literature on this product other than a case report submitted for publication. A pilot study conducted by an expert centre is therefore necessary. This is why this study is being initiated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SureTrac aArm
SureTrac™ traction device i sused to perform submucosal dissection
SureTrac is designed to perform single or multi-polar traction and to adjust the traction intensity during dissection.
The SureTrac device consists of a main attachment clip to which an elastic silicone device comprising four aligned rings is attached. The device is designed to retract and release elastic potential energy for dynamic traction. This allows for better visualisation of tissues and facilitates Submucosal dissection of colorectal lesions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SureTrac is designed to perform single or multi-polar traction and to adjust the traction intensity during dissection.
The SureTrac device consists of a main attachment clip to which an elastic silicone device comprising four aligned rings is attached. The device is designed to retract and release elastic potential energy for dynamic traction. This allows for better visualisation of tissues and facilitates Submucosal dissection of colorectal lesions.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient with a colorectal lesion larger than 2 cm
* Patient eligible for SMD with elastic traction
* Patient affiliated with or beneficiary of a social security scheme
* French-speaking patient who has signed an informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with an upper digestive tract that cannot be accessed by the endoscope.
* Patients with severe coagulation disorders and diseases associated with a risk of haemorrhage (platelets \<50G/L, PT \< 50%, INR \> 1.5, APTT \>1.5).
* Patients who are allergic to the instrument and to the drugs administered during the operation
* Patients who are not compatible with the use of the product according to the diagnosis Patients with lesions located in the appendix, ileocecal valve or within a diverticulum
* Patients with lesions that present a risk of deep submucosal invasion based on their morphological appearance (Kudo lesion \> 10 mm or Sano IIIB \> 10 mm or connect III)
* Patients with recurrence of a lesion previously resected by endoscopy or surgery
* Patients with a history of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)
* Patients with a history of pelvic radiotherapy
* Patients for whom follow-up data cannot be collected
* Pregnant women
* Protected patients: adults under guardianship, curatorship or other legal protection, deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision
* Patients hospitalised without consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz
Lyon, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2025-A01865-44
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.