Pain Neuroscience Education and Memory

NCT ID: NCT07252596

Last Updated: 2025-11-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-11-30

Study Completion Date

2026-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Brief Summary:

The goal of this observational study (case series) is to determine whether Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) can influence memory function and sensory awareness in adults (18 years and older) experiencing chronic pain lasting more than one year.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does a single PNE session improve memory performance, as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)?

Does PNE change sensory awareness, as represented by alterations in body pain drawings using a grid overlay method?

Participants will:

Complete pre-intervention assessments, including:

Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

Body chart drawing to map pain area

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

Pain Catastrophization Scale (PCS)

Receive a 10-15 minute standardized PNE session delivered by a licensed clinician trained in pain science

Complete the same assessments immediately after the intervention to identify any changes in memory, sensory awareness, and pain perception

This study aims to explore whether PNE can positively impact cognitive and sensory functions affected by chronic pain, beyond its already-established effects on movement and pain intensity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Detailed Description:

Chronic pain is a complex, multidimensional condition affecting approximately 25% of the global population. It is increasingly understood through the lens of brain-based changes, particularly the dynamic pain connectome, a network of brain regions involved in sensory, cognitive, and emotional processing. Functional reorganization in chronic pain patients may contribute to clinical symptoms beyond pain, such as memory loss, decreased sensory awareness, and altered motor control.

Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) is an educational intervention that aims to reconceptualize a patient's understanding of pain to reduce fear-avoidance, pain catastrophization, and disability. Systematic reviews have demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing pain and improving movement. Early fMRI studies suggest that PNE may also deactivate pain-related brain areas and normalize brain function.

This case series seeks to explore the impact of a single PNE session on cognitive (memory) and sensory (body perception) outcomes in individuals with chronic pain. Participants (aged 18 and older) who meet inclusion criteria and consent to the study will undergo pre- and post-intervention assessments. These include:

Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

Pain body chart (grid overlay method)

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

Pain Catastrophization Scale (PCS)

Following baseline assessments, participants will receive a 10-15 minute individualized PNE session delivered by licensed clinicians trained in advanced pain science. Immediately post-intervention, assessments will be repeated to evaluate changes.

The study aims to contribute to the understanding of how PNE may influence brain-related symptoms associated with chronic pain, specifically memory function and sensory mapping. Findings could provide early evidence to support broader applications of PNE beyond movement-related outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

This is a single-group assignment observational study (case series) where all participants receive the same intervention (Pain Neuroscience Education). Pre- and post-intervention measurements are taken to evaluate the effects of PNE on memory and sensory awareness in individuals with chronic pain.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) Intervention

Participants will receive a standardized Pain Neuroscience Education session lasting 10 to 15 minutes, delivered by a clinician trained in advanced pain science. This educational intervention uses metaphors, examples, and images to teach patients about the biology of pain, aiming to reduce pain catastrophizing and improve cognitive and sensory outcomes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A 10-15 minute individualized educational session focusing on the neuroscience of pain. The session aims to reconceptualize the patient's understanding of their chronic pain by explaining the underlying biological, cognitive, and emotional mechanisms involved. Clinicians use a standardized checklist of metaphors and teaching tools tailored to the patient's clinical presentation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE)

A 10-15 minute individualized educational session focusing on the neuroscience of pain. The session aims to reconceptualize the patient's understanding of their chronic pain by explaining the underlying biological, cognitive, and emotional mechanisms involved. Clinicians use a standardized checklist of metaphors and teaching tools tailored to the patient's clinical presentation.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 and above
* Chronic pain \> 1 year
* Provide written consent
* Proficient in reading and understanding English

Exclusion Criteria

* Not willing to participate in the study
* Have received PNE as a treatment before
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Southwest Baptist University

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Evidence In Motion

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Adriaan Louw, PT, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Evidence In Motion

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Adriaan Louw, PT, PhD

Role: CONTACT

888-709-7096

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nahin RL, Feinberg T, Kapos FP, Terman GW. Estimated Rates of Incident and Persistent Chronic Pain Among US Adults, 2019-2020. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2313563. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.13563.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37191961 (View on PubMed)

Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Melzack R. Pain and the neuromatrix in the brain. J Dent Educ. 2001 Dec;65(12):1378-82.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11780656 (View on PubMed)

Moseley GL. A pain neuromatrix approach to patients with chronic pain. Man Ther. 2003 Aug;8(3):130-40. doi: 10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00051-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12909433 (View on PubMed)

Lansdall CJ, McDougall F, Butler LM, Delmar P, Pross N, Qin S, McLeod L, Zhou X, Kerchner GA, Doody RS. Establishing Clinically Meaningful Change on Outcome Assessments Frequently Used in Trials of Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Alzheimer's Disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(1):9-18. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2022.102.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36641605 (View on PubMed)

Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15817019 (View on PubMed)

Sanders NW, Mann NH 3rd, Spengler DM. Pain drawing scoring is not improved by inclusion of patient-reported pain sensation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 1;31(23):2735-41; discussion 2742-3. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000244674.99258.f9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17077744 (View on PubMed)

Lacey RJ, Lewis M, Jordan K, Jinks C, Sim J. Interrater reliability of scoring of pain drawings in a self-report health survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 15;30(16):E455-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000174274.38485.ee.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16103839 (View on PubMed)

Matthews M, Rathleff MS, Vicenzino B, Boudreau SA. Capturing patient-reported area of knee pain: a concurrent validity study using digital technology in patients with patellofemoral pain. PeerJ. 2018 Mar 8;6:e4406. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4406. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29568700 (View on PubMed)

Wand BM, Keeves J, Bourgoin C, George PJ, Smith AJ, O'Connell NE, Moseley GL. Mislocalization of sensory information in people with chronic low back pain: a preliminary investigation. Clin J Pain. 2013 Aug;29(8):737-43. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318274b320.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23835768 (View on PubMed)

Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11690728 (View on PubMed)

Kregel J, Meeus M, Malfliet A, Dolphens M, Danneels L, Nijs J, Cagnie B. Structural and functional brain abnormalities in chronic low back pain: A systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Oct;45(2):229-37. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26092329 (View on PubMed)

Watson JA, Ryan CG, Cooper L, Ellington D, Whittle R, Lavender M, Dixon J, Atkinson G, Cooper K, Martin DJ. Pain Neuroscience Education for Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain. 2019 Oct;20(10):1140.e1-1140.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30831273 (View on PubMed)

Suso-Marti L, Cuenca-Martinez F, Alba-Quesada P, Munoz-Alarcos V, Herranz-Gomez A, Varangot-Reille C, Dominguez-Navarro F, Casana J. Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Med. 2022 Oct 29;23(11):1837-1850. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac077.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35587171 (View on PubMed)

Krebs-Roubicek E, Osterwalder R. [Gerontopsychiatry--collaboration between inpatient and outpatient care]. Ther Umsch. 1986 Jan;43(1):69-74. No abstract available. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3952688 (View on PubMed)

Rastegarnia S, St-Laurent M, DuPre E, Pinsard B, Bellec P. Brain decoding of the Human Connectome Project tasks in a dense individual fMRI dataset. Neuroimage. 2023 Dec 1;283:120395. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120395. Epub 2023 Oct 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37832707 (View on PubMed)

Smallwood RF, Laird AR, Ramage AE, Parkinson AL, Lewis J, Clauw DJ, Williams DA, Schmidt-Wilcke T, Farrell MJ, Eickhoff SB, Robin DA. Structural brain anomalies and chronic pain: a quantitative meta-analysis of gray matter volume. J Pain. 2013 Jul;14(7):663-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 May 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23685185 (View on PubMed)

Hashmi JA, Baliki MN, Huang L, Baria AT, Torbey S, Hermann KM, Schnitzer TJ, Apkarian AV. Shape shifting pain: chronification of back pain shifts brain representation from nociceptive to emotional circuits. Brain. 2013 Sep;136(Pt 9):2751-68. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt211.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23983029 (View on PubMed)

Moseley GL. Evidence for a direct relationship between cognitive and physical change during an education intervention in people with chronic low back pain. Eur J Pain. 2004 Feb;8(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/S1090-3801(03)00063-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14690673 (View on PubMed)

Moseley GL, Nicholas MK, Hodges PW. A randomized controlled trial of intensive neurophysiology education in chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):324-30. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200409000-00007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15322439 (View on PubMed)

Liao WW, Wu CY, Liu CH, Lin SH, Chiau HY, Chen CL. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the Contextual Memory Test in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment. PLoS One. 2020 Jul 31;15(7):e0236654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236654. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32735628 (View on PubMed)

Gerhardt A, Eich W, Janke S, Leisner S, Treede RD, Tesarz J. Chronic Widespread Back Pain is Distinct From Chronic Local Back Pain: Evidence From Quantitative Sensory Testing, Pain Drawings, and Psychometrics. Clin J Pain. 2016 Jul;32(7):568-79. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000300.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26379077 (View on PubMed)

Cleland JA, Childs JD, Whitman JM. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jan;89(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.126.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18164333 (View on PubMed)

Siddall B, Ram A, Jones MD, Booth J, Perriman D, Summers SJ. Short-term impact of combining pain neuroscience education with exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2022 Jan 1;163(1):e20-e30. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002308.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33863860 (View on PubMed)

Wood L, Hendrick PA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pain neuroscience education for chronic low back pain: Short-and long-term outcomes of pain and disability. Eur J Pain. 2019 Feb;23(2):234-249. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1314. Epub 2018 Oct 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30178503 (View on PubMed)

Kucyi A, Davis KD. The dynamic pain connectome. Trends Neurosci. 2015 Feb;38(2):86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Dec 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25541287 (View on PubMed)

Moseley GL. Widespread brain activity during an abdominal task markedly reduced after pain physiology education: fMRI evaluation of a single patient with chronic low back pain. Aust J Physiother. 2005;51(1):49-52. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(05)70053-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15748125 (View on PubMed)

Louw A, Puentedura EJ, Diener I, Peoples RR. Preoperative therapeutic neuroscience education for lumbar radiculopathy: a single-case fMRI report. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(7):496-508. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2015.1038374.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26395827 (View on PubMed)

Puentedura EJ, Louw A. A neuroscience approach to managing athletes with low back pain. Phys Ther Sport. 2012 Aug;13(3):123-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2011.12.001. Epub 2011 Dec 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22814445 (View on PubMed)

Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015 Aug 22;386(9995):743-800. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4. Epub 2015 Jun 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26063472 (View on PubMed)

Moseley GL. Reconceptualising pain acording to modern pain sciences. Physical Therapy Reviews. 2007;12:169-178.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Zimney K, Van Bogaert W, Louw A. The Biology of Chronic Pain and Its Implications for Pain Neuroscience Education: State of the Art. J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 21;12(13):4199. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134199.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37445234 (View on PubMed)

George SZ, Valencia C, Beneciuk JM. A psychometric investigation of fear-avoidance model measures in patients with chronic low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Apr;40(4):197-205. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3298.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20357418 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PNEMEMORY202510

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pain Modulation Effectiveness (PME)
NCT05783362 COMPLETED NA