Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-11-30
2026-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The goal of this observational study (case series) is to determine whether Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) can influence memory function and sensory awareness in adults (18 years and older) experiencing chronic pain lasting more than one year.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does a single PNE session improve memory performance, as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)?
Does PNE change sensory awareness, as represented by alterations in body pain drawings using a grid overlay method?
Participants will:
Complete pre-intervention assessments, including:
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Body chart drawing to map pain area
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Pain Catastrophization Scale (PCS)
Receive a 10-15 minute standardized PNE session delivered by a licensed clinician trained in pain science
Complete the same assessments immediately after the intervention to identify any changes in memory, sensory awareness, and pain perception
This study aims to explore whether PNE can positively impact cognitive and sensory functions affected by chronic pain, beyond its already-established effects on movement and pain intensity.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effects of Pain and the Memory of Pain on Autonomic and Neuromuscular Function
NCT02269384
Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) to Veterans With Post-Traumatic Stress and Low Back Pain
NCT05086159
Pain Neuroscience Education in Old Adults.
NCT03523949
The Effects of Pain Neuroscience Education in a Spanish-Speaking Population
NCT03785353
Pain Neuroscience Education and Exercise for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
NCT07202533
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Chronic pain is a complex, multidimensional condition affecting approximately 25% of the global population. It is increasingly understood through the lens of brain-based changes, particularly the dynamic pain connectome, a network of brain regions involved in sensory, cognitive, and emotional processing. Functional reorganization in chronic pain patients may contribute to clinical symptoms beyond pain, such as memory loss, decreased sensory awareness, and altered motor control.
Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) is an educational intervention that aims to reconceptualize a patient's understanding of pain to reduce fear-avoidance, pain catastrophization, and disability. Systematic reviews have demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing pain and improving movement. Early fMRI studies suggest that PNE may also deactivate pain-related brain areas and normalize brain function.
This case series seeks to explore the impact of a single PNE session on cognitive (memory) and sensory (body perception) outcomes in individuals with chronic pain. Participants (aged 18 and older) who meet inclusion criteria and consent to the study will undergo pre- and post-intervention assessments. These include:
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Pain body chart (grid overlay method)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Pain Catastrophization Scale (PCS)
Following baseline assessments, participants will receive a 10-15 minute individualized PNE session delivered by licensed clinicians trained in advanced pain science. Immediately post-intervention, assessments will be repeated to evaluate changes.
The study aims to contribute to the understanding of how PNE may influence brain-related symptoms associated with chronic pain, specifically memory function and sensory mapping. Findings could provide early evidence to support broader applications of PNE beyond movement-related outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) Intervention
Participants will receive a standardized Pain Neuroscience Education session lasting 10 to 15 minutes, delivered by a clinician trained in advanced pain science. This educational intervention uses metaphors, examples, and images to teach patients about the biology of pain, aiming to reduce pain catastrophizing and improve cognitive and sensory outcomes.
Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE)
A 10-15 minute individualized educational session focusing on the neuroscience of pain. The session aims to reconceptualize the patient's understanding of their chronic pain by explaining the underlying biological, cognitive, and emotional mechanisms involved. Clinicians use a standardized checklist of metaphors and teaching tools tailored to the patient's clinical presentation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE)
A 10-15 minute individualized educational session focusing on the neuroscience of pain. The session aims to reconceptualize the patient's understanding of their chronic pain by explaining the underlying biological, cognitive, and emotional mechanisms involved. Clinicians use a standardized checklist of metaphors and teaching tools tailored to the patient's clinical presentation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Chronic pain \> 1 year
* Provide written consent
* Proficient in reading and understanding English
Exclusion Criteria
* Have received PNE as a treatment before
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
OTHER
Southwest Baptist University
UNKNOWN
Evidence In Motion
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Adriaan Louw, PT, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Evidence In Motion
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nahin RL, Feinberg T, Kapos FP, Terman GW. Estimated Rates of Incident and Persistent Chronic Pain Among US Adults, 2019-2020. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2313563. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.13563.
Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment
Melzack R. Pain and the neuromatrix in the brain. J Dent Educ. 2001 Dec;65(12):1378-82.
Moseley GL. A pain neuromatrix approach to patients with chronic pain. Man Ther. 2003 Aug;8(3):130-40. doi: 10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00051-1.
Lansdall CJ, McDougall F, Butler LM, Delmar P, Pross N, Qin S, McLeod L, Zhou X, Kerchner GA, Doody RS. Establishing Clinically Meaningful Change on Outcome Assessments Frequently Used in Trials of Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Alzheimer's Disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(1):9-18. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2022.102.
Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
Sanders NW, Mann NH 3rd, Spengler DM. Pain drawing scoring is not improved by inclusion of patient-reported pain sensation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 1;31(23):2735-41; discussion 2742-3. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000244674.99258.f9.
Lacey RJ, Lewis M, Jordan K, Jinks C, Sim J. Interrater reliability of scoring of pain drawings in a self-report health survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 15;30(16):E455-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000174274.38485.ee.
Matthews M, Rathleff MS, Vicenzino B, Boudreau SA. Capturing patient-reported area of knee pain: a concurrent validity study using digital technology in patients with patellofemoral pain. PeerJ. 2018 Mar 8;6:e4406. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4406. eCollection 2018.
Wand BM, Keeves J, Bourgoin C, George PJ, Smith AJ, O'Connell NE, Moseley GL. Mislocalization of sensory information in people with chronic low back pain: a preliminary investigation. Clin J Pain. 2013 Aug;29(8):737-43. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318274b320.
Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.
Kregel J, Meeus M, Malfliet A, Dolphens M, Danneels L, Nijs J, Cagnie B. Structural and functional brain abnormalities in chronic low back pain: A systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Oct;45(2):229-37. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 16.
Watson JA, Ryan CG, Cooper L, Ellington D, Whittle R, Lavender M, Dixon J, Atkinson G, Cooper K, Martin DJ. Pain Neuroscience Education for Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain. 2019 Oct;20(10):1140.e1-1140.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
Suso-Marti L, Cuenca-Martinez F, Alba-Quesada P, Munoz-Alarcos V, Herranz-Gomez A, Varangot-Reille C, Dominguez-Navarro F, Casana J. Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Med. 2022 Oct 29;23(11):1837-1850. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac077.
Krebs-Roubicek E, Osterwalder R. [Gerontopsychiatry--collaboration between inpatient and outpatient care]. Ther Umsch. 1986 Jan;43(1):69-74. No abstract available. German.
Rastegarnia S, St-Laurent M, DuPre E, Pinsard B, Bellec P. Brain decoding of the Human Connectome Project tasks in a dense individual fMRI dataset. Neuroimage. 2023 Dec 1;283:120395. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120395. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
Smallwood RF, Laird AR, Ramage AE, Parkinson AL, Lewis J, Clauw DJ, Williams DA, Schmidt-Wilcke T, Farrell MJ, Eickhoff SB, Robin DA. Structural brain anomalies and chronic pain: a quantitative meta-analysis of gray matter volume. J Pain. 2013 Jul;14(7):663-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 May 17.
Hashmi JA, Baliki MN, Huang L, Baria AT, Torbey S, Hermann KM, Schnitzer TJ, Apkarian AV. Shape shifting pain: chronification of back pain shifts brain representation from nociceptive to emotional circuits. Brain. 2013 Sep;136(Pt 9):2751-68. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt211.
Moseley GL. Evidence for a direct relationship between cognitive and physical change during an education intervention in people with chronic low back pain. Eur J Pain. 2004 Feb;8(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/S1090-3801(03)00063-6.
Moseley GL, Nicholas MK, Hodges PW. A randomized controlled trial of intensive neurophysiology education in chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):324-30. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200409000-00007.
Liao WW, Wu CY, Liu CH, Lin SH, Chiau HY, Chen CL. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the Contextual Memory Test in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment. PLoS One. 2020 Jul 31;15(7):e0236654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236654. eCollection 2020.
Gerhardt A, Eich W, Janke S, Leisner S, Treede RD, Tesarz J. Chronic Widespread Back Pain is Distinct From Chronic Local Back Pain: Evidence From Quantitative Sensory Testing, Pain Drawings, and Psychometrics. Clin J Pain. 2016 Jul;32(7):568-79. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000300.
Cleland JA, Childs JD, Whitman JM. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jan;89(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.126.
Siddall B, Ram A, Jones MD, Booth J, Perriman D, Summers SJ. Short-term impact of combining pain neuroscience education with exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2022 Jan 1;163(1):e20-e30. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002308.
Wood L, Hendrick PA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pain neuroscience education for chronic low back pain: Short-and long-term outcomes of pain and disability. Eur J Pain. 2019 Feb;23(2):234-249. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1314. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
Kucyi A, Davis KD. The dynamic pain connectome. Trends Neurosci. 2015 Feb;38(2):86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
Moseley GL. Widespread brain activity during an abdominal task markedly reduced after pain physiology education: fMRI evaluation of a single patient with chronic low back pain. Aust J Physiother. 2005;51(1):49-52. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(05)70053-2.
Louw A, Puentedura EJ, Diener I, Peoples RR. Preoperative therapeutic neuroscience education for lumbar radiculopathy: a single-case fMRI report. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(7):496-508. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2015.1038374.
Puentedura EJ, Louw A. A neuroscience approach to managing athletes with low back pain. Phys Ther Sport. 2012 Aug;13(3):123-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2011.12.001. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015 Aug 22;386(9995):743-800. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
Moseley GL. Reconceptualising pain acording to modern pain sciences. Physical Therapy Reviews. 2007;12:169-178.
Zimney K, Van Bogaert W, Louw A. The Biology of Chronic Pain and Its Implications for Pain Neuroscience Education: State of the Art. J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 21;12(13):4199. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134199.
George SZ, Valencia C, Beneciuk JM. A psychometric investigation of fear-avoidance model measures in patients with chronic low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Apr;40(4):197-205. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3298.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PNEMEMORY202510
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.