Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-10-09
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
These disorders can greatly affect independence and quality of life, and unfortunately, there are currently no treatments that can stop or reverse the disease. Most care focuses on managing symptoms with physical therapy and medication.
Recently, a non-invasive brain stimulation technique called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been studied as a possible way to improve movement and thinking in people with ataxia. However, results so far have been mixed, possibly because of differences in disease type, treatment methods, and how improvements are measured.
New technologies, such as motion sensors and movement analysis, are helping researchers better measure the effects of treatments on walking, balance, and hand movements in daily life.
The goal of the current study is to test whether stimulating the cerebellum with anodal tDCS can improve movement in people with different types of degenerative ataxia. The study will use both standard clinical scales and precise movement analysis to measure changes. In addition, researchers will use brain recordings (EEG) taken before and after stimulation to better understand how tDCS may work in the brain
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cerebellar Non-invasive Stimulation in Ataxias
NCT03213106
tDCS for Multiple System Atrophy With Cerebellar Feature
NCT04092556
Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia 38
NCT05951010
Acute Effect of tDCS in Young Individuals
NCT06109727
Interaction of the Cognitive and Sensory-cognitive Tasks With Postural Stability in Individuals With Stability Disorders
NCT05024240
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
These disorders substantially affect autonomy and quality of life, yet effective disease-modifying or symptomatic treatments remain limited; their current management is largely supportive, including physical therapy and symptomatic pharmacological interventions.
Among non-pharmacological treatments, cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technique, has been employed in several studies with the aim to improve both motor and cognitive symptoms in different forms of ataxia, with conflicting results, so that, at present, it is not possible to determine its therapeutic potential with certainty. In this regard, it has been hypothesized that the large variability of clinical outcomes associated with such approach is due to several factors including, among the most relevant, the heterogeneity of ataxia aetiology, the significant differences in terms of protocols of stimulation and the lack of sensitive objective measures to be integrated with the scales traditionally employed in the clinical routine. Indeed, in the last years, quantitative analysis of movement (performed using either motion capture system or wearable inertial sensors) has shown to be a reliable approach to assess, in combination with clinical data, the existence and magnitude of possible positive effects induced by NIBS on basic motor functions (i.e., gait and balance) as well as to monitor real-world mobility and characterize physical activity patterns of people with ataxia.
The ability of cerebellar tDCS to influence the cerebellar-thalamus-cortical pathway has been demonstrated by the cerebellar-brain inhibition (CBI) TMS paradigm. Moreover, the cerebellar-cortical connectivity has been explored with NIBS combined with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and EEG with online and offline paradigms. Several studies show that cerebellar NIBS is able to influence cortical oscillations and that an increase of beta power in frontal and parietal region is involved sensory-motor integration and motor control through the modulation of the cerebellar-thalums cortical circuit; the role of cortical gamma oscillation on motor activity following cerebellar stimulation is less characterized, but some evidence indicates that cortical gamma activity reflects excitatory action of the cerebellum on the motor thalamus and the motor cortex. However, in this case the results are controversial probably due to the heterogeneous methodological approaches.
Based on these observations, the aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of cerebellar anodal tDCS in improving ataxia in different forms of degenerative ataxia with a sham-controlled approach, using validated clinical rating scales as well as quantitative techniques for human movement analysis focused on gait and upper limb functionality (i.e., hand-to-mouth task) as data on these motor tasks are already available for people with ataxia.
Moreover, in order to explore the mechanism underlying the therapeutic effect of cerebellar tDCS data obtained from resting state EEG before and after stimulation will be analyzed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sham
For sham stimulation the tDCS device delivered just a short ramp of current to let patients feel a skin sensation similar to those perceived by those actually treated.
Sham (No Treatment)
In the "Sham" arm, no current was delivered to the brain except for the initial few seconds
Real
transcranial direct current stimulation
Anodal stimulation is delivered by a battery-driven stimulator (NeuroConn GmbH, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany) through a pair of saline-soaked surface sponge electrodes (7 x 5 cm2) producing a constant current of 2 mA for 20 min. An electroconductive gel is applied to the electrodes to reduce contact impedance and the electrodes are held in place using elastic gauzes Stimulation is preceded by a ramping up and ramping down for 20 sec at the beginning and at the end of each session, respectively. The anode is placed 2 cm under the inion and the cathode was placed over the right deltoid muscle. For sham stimulation the machine did not deliver any current after the ramping up, so both groups of patients could feel the same skin sensation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
transcranial direct current stimulation
Anodal stimulation is delivered by a battery-driven stimulator (NeuroConn GmbH, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany) through a pair of saline-soaked surface sponge electrodes (7 x 5 cm2) producing a constant current of 2 mA for 20 min. An electroconductive gel is applied to the electrodes to reduce contact impedance and the electrodes are held in place using elastic gauzes Stimulation is preceded by a ramping up and ramping down for 20 sec at the beginning and at the end of each session, respectively. The anode is placed 2 cm under the inion and the cathode was placed over the right deltoid muscle. For sham stimulation the machine did not deliver any current after the ramping up, so both groups of patients could feel the same skin sensation.
Sham (No Treatment)
In the "Sham" arm, no current was delivered to the brain except for the initial few seconds
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Cagliari
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Massimiliano Pau
Full Professor of Bioengineering
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Cagliari
Cagliari, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4642022/CE Study Code tDCS-ATX
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.