PAN-ICIS Study: ICIS for Early Detection of Infectious Complications in Pancreatic Surgery
NCT ID: NCT07248527
Last Updated: 2025-12-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
400 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-11-01
2028-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
International Pancreatic Surgery Outcomes Study - PancreasGroup.Org
NCT04652271
Infectious Outcomes Following Pancreas Transplantation
NCT00332111
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis Severity Indication (PEPSI) Study
NCT03075592
The Development of Pancreatic Injury in the Course of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection
NCT04433754
Confirmation of Association Between Cystic Fluid Analysis With Pancreatic Cystic Lesions
NCT05497271
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The PAN-ICIS study is a prospective observational study enrolling patients undergoing pancreatic resections. ICIS will be measured postoperatively and compared with conventional inflammatory markers. Perioperative variables, postoperative complications, and infectious outcomes will be collected prospectively. Accurate early differentiation between SIRS and sepsis represents a major need in pancreatic surgery. This study will evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of ICIS for early detection of postoperative infectious complications. If validated, ICIS may support earlier antimicrobial therapy, reduce unnecessary antibiotic exposure, and improve postoperative outcomes in this high-risk population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients following pancreatic surgery
All patients following pancreatic surgery will be enrolled in this study
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Indication for an elective pancreatic procedure
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Known hematologic malignancy or hematological pathology.
* Refusal to participate.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Charles University, Czech Republic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Štěpán-Ota Schütz
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Surgery 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague
Prague, Prague 6, Czechia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L, Kmiecik TE, Ko CY, Cohen ME. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Nov;217(5):833-42.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.385. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
Cosgrove SE. The relationship between antimicrobial resistance and patient outcomes: mortality, length of hospital stay, and health care costs. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jan 15;42 Suppl 2:S82-9. doi: 10.1086/499406.
de Kraker ME, Wolkewitz M, Davey PG, Koller W, Berger J, Nagler J, Icket C, Kalenic S, Horvatic J, Seifert H, Kaasch A, Paniara O, Argyropoulou A, Bompola M, Smyth E, Skally M, Raglio A, Dumpis U, Melbarde Kelmere A, Borg M, Xuereb D, Ghita MC, Noble M, Kolman J, Grabljevec S, Turner D, Lansbury L, Grundmann H. Burden of antimicrobial resistance in European hospitals: excess mortality and length of hospital stay associated with bloodstream infections due to Escherichia coli resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Feb;66(2):398-407. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq412. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
Pierrakos C, Vincent JL. Sepsis biomarkers: a review. Crit Care. 2010;14(1):R15. doi: 10.1186/cc8872. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
Limongelli P, Pai M, Bansi D, Thiallinagram A, Tait P, Jackson J, Habib NA, Williamson RC, Jiao LR. Correlation between preoperative biliary drainage, bile duct contamination, and postoperative outcomes for pancreatic surgery. Surgery. 2007 Sep;142(3):313-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.04.022.
Nakamura K, Sho M, Kinoshita S, Akahori T, Nagai M, Nakagawa K, Takagi T, Ikeda N. New insight into the association between bile infection and clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Dec;27(12):992-1001. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.781. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
Ohgi K, Sugiura T, Yamamoto Y, Okamura Y, Ito T, Uesaka K. Bacterobilia may trigger the development and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery. 2016 Sep;160(3):725-30. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.03.032. Epub 2016 May 24.
Loos M, Strobel O, Legominski M, Dietrich M, Hinz U, Brenner T, Heininger A, Weigand MA, Buchler MW, Hackert T. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: Microbial growth determines outcome. Surgery. 2018 Dec;164(6):1185-1190. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.07.024. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
Droogh DHM, Groen JV, de Boer MGJ, van Prehn J, Putter H, Bonsing BA, van Eijck CHJ, Vahrmeijer AL, van Santvoort HC, Groot Koerkamp B, Mieog JSD. Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis after pancreatoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Surg. 2023 Oct 10;110(11):1458-1466. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad213.
Nahm CB, Connor SJ, Samra JS, Mittal A. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: a review of traditional and emerging concepts. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar 15;11:105-118. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S120217. eCollection 2018.
Saito R, Kawaida H, Amemiya H, Nakata Y, Izumo W, Furuya M, Maruyama S, Takiguchi K, Shoda K, Ashizawa N, Nakayama Y, Shiraishi K, Furuya S, Akaike H, Kawaguchi Y, Ichikawa D. Clinical significance of postoperative complications after pancreatic surgery in time-to-complication and length of postoperative hospital stay: a retrospective study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jun 5;409(1):173. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03369-x.
Sankar V, Webster NR. Clinical application of sepsis biomarkers. J Anesth. 2013 Apr;27(2):269-83. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1502-7. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
Aloisio E, Dolci A, Panteghini M. Procalcitonin: Between evidence and critical issues. Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Sep;496:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
Leboueny M, Maloupazoa Siawaya AC, Bouanga LDJ, Mvoundza Ndjindji O, Mveang Nzoghe A, Djoba Siawaya JF. Changes of C-reactive protein and Procalcitonin after four weeks of treatment in patients with pulmonary TB. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2023 Jan 18;31:100348. doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2023.100348. eCollection 2023 May.
Yu CW, Juan LI, Wu MH, Shen CJ, Wu JY, Lee CC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cell count for suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2013 Feb;100(3):322-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9008. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
Riley LK, Rupert J. Evaluation of Patients with Leukocytosis. Am Fam Physician. 2015 Dec 1;92(11):1004-11.
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, Machado FR, Mcintyre L, Ostermann M, Prescott HC, Schorr C, Simpson S, Wiersinga WJ, Alshamsi F, Angus DC, Arabi Y, Azevedo L, Beale R, Beilman G, Belley-Cote E, Burry L, Cecconi M, Centofanti J, Coz Yataco A, De Waele J, Dellinger RP, Doi K, Du B, Estenssoro E, Ferrer R, Gomersall C, Hodgson C, Moller MH, Iwashyna T, Jacob S, Kleinpell R, Klompas M, Koh Y, Kumar A, Kwizera A, Lobo S, Masur H, McGloughlin S, Mehta S, Mehta Y, Mer M, Nunnally M, Oczkowski S, Osborn T, Papathanassoglou E, Perner A, Puskarich M, Roberts J, Schweickert W, Seckel M, Sevransky J, Sprung CL, Welte T, Zimmerman J, Levy M. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2. No abstract available.
Marchegiani G, Barreto SG, Bannone E, Sarr M, Vollmer CM, Connor S, Falconi M, Besselink MG, Salvia R, Wolfgang CL, Zyromski NJ, Yeo CJ, Adham M, Siriwardena AK, Takaori K, Hilal MA, Loos M, Probst P, Hackert T, Strobel O, Busch ORC, Lillemoe KD, Miao Y, Halloran CM, Werner J, Friess H, Izbicki JR, Bockhorn M, Vashist YK, Conlon K, Passas I, Gianotti L, Del Chiaro M, Schulick RD, Montorsi M, Olah A, Fusai GK, Serrablo A, Zerbi A, Fingerhut A, Andersson R, Padbury R, Dervenis C, Neoptolemos JP, Bassi C, Buchler MW, Shrikhande SV; International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery. Postpancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis (PPAP): Definition and Grading From the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Ann Surg. 2022 Apr 1;275(4):663-672. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005226.
Quero G, Massimiani G, Lucinato C, Fiorillo C, Menghi R, Laterza V, Schena CA, De Sio D, Rosa F, Papa V, Tortorelli AP, Tondolo V, Alfieri S. Acute pancreatitis after pancreatoduodenectomy: clinical outcomes and predictive factors analysis according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition. HPB (Oxford). 2023 Mar;25(3):363-373. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
Ho CK, Kleeff J, Friess H, Buchler MW. Complications of pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford). 2005;7(2):99-108. doi: 10.1080/13651820510028936.
Aoki S, Miyata H, Konno H, Gotoh M, Motoi F, Kumamaru H, Wakabayashi G, Kakeji Y, Mori M, Seto Y, Unno M. Risk factors of serious postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy and risk calculators for predicting postoperative complications: a nationwide study of 17,564 patients in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017 May;24(5):243-251. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.438. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, de Haan RJ, de Wit LT, Busch OR, Obertop H. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg. 2000 Dec;232(6):786-95. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200012000-00007.
Povoski SP, Karpeh MS Jr, Conlon KC, Blumgart LH, Brennan MF. Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1999 Aug;230(2):131-42. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199908000-00001.
Kent TS, Sachs TE, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr. The burden of infection for elective pancreatic resections. Surgery. 2013 Jan;153(1):86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.03.026. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
Okano K, Hirao T, Unno M, Fujii T, Yoshitomi H, Suzuki S, Satoi S, Takahashi S, Kainuma O, Suzuki Y. Postoperative infectious complications after pancreatic resection. Br J Surg. 2015 Nov;102(12):1551-60. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9919. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
Sourrouille I, Gaujoux S, Lacave G, Bert F, Dokmak S, Belghiti J, Paugam-Burtz C, Sauvanet A. Five days of postoperative antimicrobial therapy decreases infectious complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients at risk for bile contamination. HPB (Oxford). 2013 Jun;15(6):473-80. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12012. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
Smajic J, Tupkovic LR, Husic S, Avdagic SS, Hodzic S, Imamovic S. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome in Surgical Patients. Med Arch. 2018 Apr;72(2):116-119. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.116-119.
Margraf A, Ludwig N, Zarbock A, Rossaint J. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome After Surgery: Mechanisms and Protection. Anesth Analg. 2020 Dec;131(6):1693-1707. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005175.
Baddam S, Burns B. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. 2025 Jun 20. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547669/
D'Angelica MI, Ellis RJ, Liu JB, Brajcich BC, Gonen M, Thompson VM, Cohen ME, Seo SK, Zabor EC, Babicky ML, Bentrem DJ, Behrman SW, Bertens KA, Celinski SA, Chan CHF, Dillhoff M, Dixon MEB, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Gholami S, House MG, Karanicolas PJ, Lavu H, Maithel SK, McAuliffe JC, Ott MJ, Reames BN, Sanford DE, Sarpel U, Scaife CL, Serrano PE, Smith T, Snyder RA, Talamonti MS, Weber SM, Yopp AC, Pitt HA, Ko CY. Piperacillin-Tazobactam Compared With Cefoxitin as Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 May 9;329(18):1579-1588. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.5728.
Vrbacky F, Fatorova I, Blazek M, Smahel P, Zak P. Intensive Care Infection Score (ICIS) is elevated in patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 in the early stages of disease. J Infect Public Health. 2022 May;15(5):533-538. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
Kaeslin, Martha, Brunner, Saskia, Raths, Janine and Huber, Andreas. "Improvement in detecting bacterial infection in lower respiratory tract infections using the Intensive Care Infection Score (ICIS)" LaboratoriumsMedizin, vol. 40, no. 3, 2016, pp. 175-182.
Nierhaus A, Linssen J, Wichmann D, Braune S, Kluge S. Use of a weighted, automated analysis of the differential blood count to differentiate sepsis from non-infectious systemic inflammation: the intensive care infection score (ICIS). Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2012 Apr;11(2):109-15. doi: 10.2174/187152812800392841.
Weimann K, Zimmermann M, Spies CD, Wernecke KD, Vicherek O, Nachtigall I, Tafelski S, Weimann A. Intensive Care Infection Score--A new approach to distinguish between infectious and noninfectious processes in intensive care and medicosurgical patients. J Int Med Res. 2015 Jun;43(3):435-51. doi: 10.1177/0300060514557711. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
van der Geest PJ, Mohseni M, Linssen J, Duran S, de Jonge R, Groeneveld AB. The intensive care infection score - a novel marker for the prediction of infection and its severity. Crit Care. 2016 Jul 7;20(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1366-6.
Deniz E, Klatte S, Tekin-Bubenheim N, Zimmermann M. Intensive care infection score: ICIS discriminates between infected and uninfected critically ill patients in routine intensive care unit practice. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2025 Jun 5;13(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40635-025-00767-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
108/20-72/2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.