DEciphering CIrculating SIgnatures Of Infected Pancreatic Necrosis
NCT ID: NCT06899087
Last Updated: 2025-07-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
45 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-07-01
2026-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is the leading cause of gastrointestinal hospital admissions, accounting for over 300,000 emergency department visits annually and imposing a significant socio-economic burden. It is an acute inflammatory condition of the pancreas characterized by damage to the acinar cells, which triggers an inflammatory response and causes widespread systemic damage. In about 20% of cases, the disease progresses to necrotizing pancreatitis (NP), a severe form characterized by tissue necrosis. NP poses serious health risks, especially when the necrotic tissue becomes infected, leading to infected (peri-)pancreatic necrosis (IPN), which is associated with secondary organ failure (OF), sepsis, and mortality rates as high as 40%. While patients with sterile (peri-)pancreatic necrosis (SPN) can often be managed conservatively, those with IPN typically require antibiotics and therapeutic interventions such as endoscopic drainage or surgery.
Timely recognition and treatment of IPN are crucial for improving patient outcomes, yet current diagnostic methods based on clinical symptoms and routine lab markers lack the specificity to reliably distinguish SPN from IPN in the early stages. Furthermore, while multifactorial scoring systems like Ranson, Imrie, and APACHE II predict necrosis and overall severity in AP, they are not accurate for identifying IPN or predicting mortality in NP. The diagnostic gap delays appropriate treatment, allowing the infection to advance and limiting available therapeutic options. The growing incidence and significant impact of AP and NP in the general population underscore the urgent need to better understand IPN pathophysiology and to develop specific diagnostic biomarkers that can improve prognosis, guide therapeutic decisions, and enhance patient outcomes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Molecular Analysis of Microbial DNA in Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis
NCT01815489
Predicting Pancreatic Necrosis Using mitDNA
NCT03788928
Identification of the Impact of Acute Pancreatitis on Quality of Life
NCT04222075
Exploration of Blood Biomarkers, Including Whole Blood Viscosity as a Prognostic Factor for Acute Pancreatitis
NCT04553783
Evaluation of Proteasome as a Marker of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients Following Curative Treatment
NCT01492127
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study group
participants locally through the University of Minnesota and the M Health Fairview system before the two-week mark following acute pancreatitis onset
not interventional
This is an observational study
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
not interventional
This is an observational study
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of NP based on CECT.
Exclusion Criteria
* pancreatic cancer
* pregnancy, lactation
* solid organ transplant
* immunodeficiency disorders like AIDS.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Minnesota
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Guru Trikudanatham, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Minnesota
Petr Vanek, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Minnesota
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Petr Vanek
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DECISION
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.