Anaesthetic Technique for Minor Lower Limb Amputation Surgery (ATLLAS)

NCT ID: NCT07244627

Last Updated: 2025-12-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-31

Study Completion Date

2027-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Major lower limb amputation is recognised as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. In the United Kingdom, 30-day in-hospital mortality is up to 8.7%. Minor lower limb amputations, defined as amputation at or below the ankle, are often considered minor procedures, but mortality at one month is 3.5%, similar to that of below knee amputations and 20% at one year. Any amputation is an indicator of poor health and should be considered a pivotal event in a patient's healthcare journey. In England alone, 21,738 minor lower limb amputations were performed between 2017 and 2020, with annual procedures on an increasing trajectory. Recent work has demonstrated striking regional differences in rates of major lower limb amputations in England which the authors ascribed to inequalities in the provision of healthcare. Improving the regional provision of support services for amputees is also part of the current governments NHS Long Term Workforce Plan (https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/access-to-prosthetics-for-amputees-in-england/).

While multiple studies have aimed to assess the impact of anaesthetic technique on outcomes following major lower limb amputation, there is little published data on factors impacting morbidity and mortality following minor lower limb amputation surgery. Evidence from the USA has shown deleterious effect of general anaesthesia (GA) as compared to regional anaesthesia for minor lower limb amputation in patients with peripheral artery disease. Higher rates of post-operative wound disruption, pneumonia, prolonged intubation, and septic shock were demonstrated with general anaesthesia rather than regional anaesthesia.

Investigators have performed a single centre retrospective review of 382 patients undergoing minor lower limb amputation for vascular disease in our Trust (UHNM). We found that our patients undergoing these procedures under peripheral nerve block (PNB) techniques were older with higher rates of heart and kidney disease than those receiving a general anaesthetic. Despite this, these patients had reduced complications and length of hospital stay than the fitter patients. The difference seen here became even more pronounced following propensity matching. Investigators demonstrated a clinically significant reduction in the respiratory complication rate of 5.3% and overall complication rate of 12% and a reduction in length of stay of 6 days following use of peripheral nerve blocks rather than general anaesthesia. Investigators also demonstrated a reduction in length of stay of 4 days when DARF Form v4 - July 2023 16 administering peripheral nerve blocks rather than neuraxial anaesthesia (NA). This small and monocentric study suggests that there is value in repeating this process in a larger, national dataset.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, Lower

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (aged 18 and over).
* National Vascular Registry data field - Procedure undertaken - amputation through ankle or below.
* Procedure undertaken between 1st January 2019 and 1st January 2025.

Exclusion Criteria

* Amputations due to trauma, neurological disease or chronic pain
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital of North Midlands

Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Aviva Ogbolosingha

Role: CONTACT

01782 675380

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Aviva Ogbolosingha

Role: primary

01782 675380

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yammine K, Hayek F, Assi C. A meta-analysis of mortality after minor amputation among patients with diabetes and/or peripheral vascular disease. J Vasc Surg. 2020 Dec;72(6):2197-2207. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.07.086. Epub 2020 Aug 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32835790 (View on PubMed)

Ahmad N, Thomas GN, Gill P, Chan C, Torella F. Lower limb amputation in England: prevalence, regional variation and relationship with revascularisation, deprivation and risk factors. A retrospective review of hospital data. J R Soc Med. 2014 Dec;107(12):483-9. doi: 10.1177/0141076814557301. Epub 2014 Nov 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25389229 (View on PubMed)

Chery J, Semaan E, Darji S, Briggs WT, Yarmush J, D'Ayala M. Impact of regional versus general anesthesia on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing major lower extremity amputation. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Jul;28(5):1149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.07.033. Epub 2013 Dec 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24342828 (View on PubMed)

Waton S, Johal A, Birmpili P et al. National Vascular Registry: 2022 Annual Report. London: The Royal College of Surgeons of England, November 2022

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Khan SA, Qianyi RL, Liu C, Ng EL, Fook-Chong S, Tan MG. Effect of anaesthetic technique on mortality following major lower extremity amputation: a propensity score-matched observational study. Anaesthesia. 2013 Jun;68(6):612-20. doi: 10.1111/anae.12182. Epub 2013 Apr 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23550809 (View on PubMed)

Pisansky AJB, Brovman EY, Kuo C, Kaye AD, Urman RD. Perioperative Outcomes after Regional Versus General Anesthesia for Above the Knee Amputations. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Apr;48:53-66. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Dec 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29217448 (View on PubMed)

Walsh M, Lim S, Gill L, et al. Deleterious Effects of General Anesthesia on Minor Foot Amputations. Abstract from the 2018 Midwestern Vascular Surgical Society Annual Meeting, Journal of Vascular Surgery 2018; 68: E54-55

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

338872

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Hip Fracture Surgery in Elderly Patients
NCT01199276 COMPLETED PHASE2