Evaluation of Nystagmus Examination Using Wearable AR Glasses in Vertigo Patients
NCT ID: NCT07238387
Last Updated: 2025-11-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-01
2029-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Vertigo is common in emergency and outpatient settings, yet standard oculomotor testing usually requires dedicated equipment and exam rooms. This study evaluates whether nystagmus examinations performed with wearable augmented-reality (AR) glasses are equivalent to conventional examination-room testing for classifying central vs. peripheral vertigo. The investigators also assess diagnostic accuracy, patient tolerability, and the reliability of AR-based interpretation (test-retest and inter-rater).
Study Design:
Prospective, single-center, within-subject randomized equivalence study at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Each participant completes both AR-based and conventional oculomotor testing in a randomized order during the same visit, separated by a 30-minute washout. The study uses an evaluator-blind approach: de-identified trajectories are reviewed offline by independent experts who are masked to test modality. A follow-up visit (\~1 week) captures adverse events and patient experience.
Participants:
Adults (≥18 years) presenting with vertigo who can tolerate the AR headset and provide consent. Key exclusions include conditions that prevent reliable eye-tracking (e.g., corrected visual acuity \<20/40), recent use of vestibular suppressants (within 24 hours), and other factors limiting cooperation or safety.
Interventions and Procedures:
The AR system records eye movements and presents standardized visual stimuli. Conventional testing follows current clinical standards (e.g., Frenzel/oculomotor exam). All recordings are stored securely for blinded review.
Outcomes:
Primary endpoint: Equivalence of diagnostic agreement (central vs. peripheral) between AR-based and conventional methods, quantified by Cohen's kappa (κ) with a predefined equivalence margin.
Secondary endpoints: (1) Diagnostic accuracy of the AR method in a clinically-indicated imaging subgroup (MRI preferred; CT as needed) using a sequential evaluation strategy; (2) Patient discomfort/tolerability using VAS and CSQ-VR, compared between modalities; (3) Test-retest reliability of AR-based classifications; (4) Inter-rater reliability between independent evaluators, with a third reader adjudicating discordant cases; (5) prespecified subgroup analyses by age, medical history, and vestibular function.
Sample Size and Duration:
Approximately 200 participants will be enrolled (target \~180 evaluable after \~10% attrition). Total study duration is \~2 years, including enrollment, follow-up, and analysis.
Risks and Benefits:
Both tests are non-invasive. Potential transient discomfort (e.g., eye strain or cybersickness) will be monitored. There may be no direct benefit to participants; however, results could support broader, more accessible, and standardized vertigo assessment.
Data Security and Privacy:
All data are de-identified, stored on secure platforms with role-based access and audit trails. Safety events are monitored and graded, and protocol deviations are handled per Good Clinical Practice.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessing the Reliability of Smooth Pursuit Across Various Neck Postures Using a Custom Ocular Motor Detection System
NCT06634576
Boarding Ring Glasses Versus Placebo Glasses or Not Glasses in the Treatment of Vestibular Neuritis
NCT04678167
Evaluation of the OtoBand in Subjects With Self-reported Vertigo to Reduce Severity of Vertigo in a Real-world Setting
NCT04869020
Nystagmus Assessment for Patients Consulting in the Emergency Department for Acute Vertigo
NCT05176015
The Accuracy of Manual BPPV Diagnostics When Using VNG Goggles.
NCT05846711
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
AR-First Examination Sequence
AR-based examination first, then conventional examination
Wearable Augmented Reality Glasses for Nystagmus Examination
Intervention 1 - Wearable Augmented Reality Glasses for Nystagmus Examination Participants undergo a standardized nystagmus examination using wearable augmented reality (AR) glasses equipped with an integrated eye-tracking system. The AR-based system records real-time eye movements in both light and dark conditions, allowing for simultaneous examiner visualization and data storage. This method eliminates the need for traditional Frenzel goggles and provides automated signal quality assessment.
Conventional Nystagmus Examination
Intervention 2 - Conventional Nystagmus Examination Participants undergo a conventional clinical nystagmus examination performed by an otolaryngologist using standard Frenzel goggles under similar test conditions. Eye movements are visually assessed without integrated digital recording or automated signal analysis.
Conventional-First Examination Sequence
Conventional examination first, then AR-based examination
Wearable Augmented Reality Glasses for Nystagmus Examination
Intervention 1 - Wearable Augmented Reality Glasses for Nystagmus Examination Participants undergo a standardized nystagmus examination using wearable augmented reality (AR) glasses equipped with an integrated eye-tracking system. The AR-based system records real-time eye movements in both light and dark conditions, allowing for simultaneous examiner visualization and data storage. This method eliminates the need for traditional Frenzel goggles and provides automated signal quality assessment.
Conventional Nystagmus Examination
Intervention 2 - Conventional Nystagmus Examination Participants undergo a conventional clinical nystagmus examination performed by an otolaryngologist using standard Frenzel goggles under similar test conditions. Eye movements are visually assessed without integrated digital recording or automated signal analysis.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Wearable Augmented Reality Glasses for Nystagmus Examination
Intervention 1 - Wearable Augmented Reality Glasses for Nystagmus Examination Participants undergo a standardized nystagmus examination using wearable augmented reality (AR) glasses equipped with an integrated eye-tracking system. The AR-based system records real-time eye movements in both light and dark conditions, allowing for simultaneous examiner visualization and data storage. This method eliminates the need for traditional Frenzel goggles and provides automated signal quality assessment.
Conventional Nystagmus Examination
Intervention 2 - Conventional Nystagmus Examination Participants undergo a conventional clinical nystagmus examination performed by an otolaryngologist using standard Frenzel goggles under similar test conditions. Eye movements are visually assessed without integrated digital recording or automated signal analysis.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to complete both AR-based and conventional oculomotor testing during the same visit (with \~30-minute washout).
* Provide written informed consent.
* Adequate vision for eye-tracking and calibration (e.g., corrected visual acuity ≥20/40 in each eye).
* Willing and able to return for the follow-up visit.
Exclusion Criteria
* Ocular conditions that would interfere with reliable eye tracking (e.g., corrected visual acuity \<20/40, dense cataract, severe ptosis/strabismus, active ocular infection/inflammation).
* History of photosensitive epilepsy or seizure disorder triggered by visual stimuli.
* Severe motion sickness/cybersickness or inability to tolerate the AR headset.
* Significant cognitive impairment or psychiatric condition precluding informed consent or protocol compliance.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding (per investigator judgment and IRB policy).
* Any other condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would make participation unsafe or confound study results.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202500606B0
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.