Effects of Static Stretching and Self-myofascial Release on Local and Remote Range of Motion
NCT ID: NCT07213011
Last Updated: 2025-11-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-05-14
2025-07-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Therefore, this study explores the potential for local and remote effects of static stretching and self-myofascial release applied to the right posterolateral neck region. Specifically, this study investigates whether targeted cervical interventions can acutely improve not only cervical range of motion but also hip flexion range of motion on the ipsilateral (right) side. The proposed mechanisms include reductions in tissue stiffness, increased stretch tolerance and pressure pain threshold, and the transmission of mechanical forces along myofascial chains, particularly the "superficial back line," which anatomically connects the cervical region to the posterior lower limb. The primary aim of this study was to compare the acute effects of neck static stretching and neck self-myofascial release using a massage roller on both local (cervical) and remote (right hip) ROM.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Benefit of Adding Stretching to Standard Intervention For Patients With Nonspecific Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT03194490
"Effects of Manual Lymphatic Drainage in the Neck in Healthy Subjects. Experimental Randomized Crossover Study"
NCT03709407
Acute Effects of Gastrocnemius Myofascial Release on Cervical Flexion and Extension Range of Motion in Healthy Adults
NCT07025746
Effects of Instrument-assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) on Pain and Disability in Individuals With Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain.
NCT03563079
Muscle Energy Techniques and Self-Stretching in Nonspecific Neck Pain
NCT06199063
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To examine differences in the main outcomes, a repeated-measures ANOVA (3 conditions × 2 time points) will be conducted. When a significant condition × time interaction is detected, post hoc analyses with Scheffé corrections will be applied to determine specific between and within-group differences. Effect sizes will be reported as partial eta squared (η²p). Statistical significance will be set at p \< 0.05 for all analyses
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Static stretching
The neck static stretching protocol consisted of four sets of 45 seconds each, with 45-second rest intervals between sets, resulting in a total intervention time of three minutes. Participants remained seated in an upright position and executed the stretch by gently inclining the head in an anterolateral direction, forward and to the left, while using the contralateral (left) hand to assist the movement. This positioning was intended to specifically target and elongate the right posterolateral neck musculature.
Neck static stretching
The neck static stretching (SS) protocol consisted of four sets, each lasting 45 seconds, interspersed with 45-second recovery periods (total intervention time: 3 minutes). While seated on a chair, participants performed the stretch by gently inclining the head forward and to the left in an antero-lateral direction and assisting the movement with the contralateral (left) hand to specifically elongate the right posterolateral neck region.
Self-myofascial release
For the neck self-myofascial release intervention, a Theraband® Roller Massager (The Hygenic Corporation, Akron, OH, USA) was utilized. This device features a rigid plastic core encased in high-density foam with a grooved surface, designed to facilitate both superficial and deeper tissue stimulation. The self-myofascial release protocol consisted of four sets, each comprising 45 rhythmic rolling movements performed at a standardized cadence of one roll per second, totaling three minutes of intervention time. The rolling tempo was regulated using a metronome application (Tempo Lite, version 5.0.8; Apple App Store). A 45-second rest interval was provided between sets. While seated, participants self-administered the rolling technique to the right posterolateral region of the neck, ensuring coverage of the largest possible surface area. To optimize tissue elongation, the head was maintained in a gently inclined anterolateral position, forward and to the left, throughout the intervention.
Neck self-myofascial release
For the self-myofascial release (SMR) intervention, a Theraband® roller massager was employed. The device consists of a rigid plastic core surrounded by dense foam, designed with a grooved surface to facilitate both superficial and deeper tissue stimulation. The SMR protocol comprised four sets (total intervention time: 3 minutes), during which participants executed 45 rhythmic rolling movements per set at a cadence of one roll per second. The tempo was standardized using a metronome application. For the SMR condition, the protocol included 45-second recovery intervals between sets. Participants, seated on a chair, were instructed to perform self-administered rolling on the right posterolateral neck region using the massage roller and to cover the largest possible area of the posterolateral neck region during the rolling, with the head gently inclined forward and to the left in an antero-lateral direction.
Control
In the control condition (CC), participants remained seated quietly on a chair for a period of 6 minutes, matching the duration of the static stretching and self-myofascial release protocols, but without performing any active intervention, between the baseline and post assessments.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neck static stretching
The neck static stretching (SS) protocol consisted of four sets, each lasting 45 seconds, interspersed with 45-second recovery periods (total intervention time: 3 minutes). While seated on a chair, participants performed the stretch by gently inclining the head forward and to the left in an antero-lateral direction and assisting the movement with the contralateral (left) hand to specifically elongate the right posterolateral neck region.
Neck self-myofascial release
For the self-myofascial release (SMR) intervention, a Theraband® roller massager was employed. The device consists of a rigid plastic core surrounded by dense foam, designed with a grooved surface to facilitate both superficial and deeper tissue stimulation. The SMR protocol comprised four sets (total intervention time: 3 minutes), during which participants executed 45 rhythmic rolling movements per set at a cadence of one roll per second. The tempo was standardized using a metronome application. For the SMR condition, the protocol included 45-second recovery intervals between sets. Participants, seated on a chair, were instructed to perform self-administered rolling on the right posterolateral neck region using the massage roller and to cover the largest possible area of the posterolateral neck region during the rolling, with the head gently inclined forward and to the left in an antero-lateral direction.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* current and recent injuries or damage to the upper and lower limbs.
18 Years
55 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Palermo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ewan Thomas
Associate Professor in the Department of Psychology, Education Sciences and Human Movement
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Palermo
Palermo, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RE 306/2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.