Effect of Snow-plow Technique on the Postoperative Pain Following Direct Composite Restoration

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-12

Study Completion Date

2025-10-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is designed to compare two modern techniques used to restore decayed back teeth with tooth-colored filling materials. Some patients experience temporary discomfort or sensitivity after these types of dental treatments. The purpose of this study is to learn whether one technique may help reduce this short-term sensitivity compared to the other.

Adults who need fillings on both sides of their mouth are invited to participate. Each patient will receive one filling using each technique, placed in different teeth during the same appointment. The procedures will be performed using standard clinical methods and materials.

After treatment, participants will be contacted by telephone to report any discomfort at several time points during the first week. The interviewer will not know which technique was used for each tooth to ensure unbiased reporting. This information will help dentists better understand how these techniques affect patients' comfort in the days following treatment.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Clinical Evaluation of "Snow-plow"Technique Versus Bulk Fill Technique in Restorations of Class II Cavities

NCT04943120

Class II Dental Caries

COMPLETED NA

The Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Indirect Full Coverage Restorations Compared to Direct Composite Resin Restorations

NCT04249726

Endodontically Treated Teeth

UNKNOWN NA

Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites

NCT06137989

Dental Caries Class II

COMPLETED NA

Post-operative Sensitivity in Composite Restorations

NCT06092567

Class II Dental Caries Sensitivity, Tooth

COMPLETED NA

Clinical Evaluation of Color-Adjusting Composite Resin Following In-Office Dental Bleaching

NCT06884813

Composite Resins

RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Postoperative tooth sensitivity is a common but often transient symptom following the placement of direct posterior resin composite restorations. Patients frequently report mild to moderate discomfort, particularly during the first few days after treatment, which can influence their perception of treatment success and overall satisfaction. While advances in adhesive dentistry and restorative materials have greatly improved clinical outcomes, postoperative sensitivity remains a relevant clinical concern.

This clinical trial is designed to compare two contemporary restorative techniques-the snow-plow technique and the resin coating technique following immediate dentin sealing-in terms of postoperative patient-reported pain during the first postoperative week. Both techniques aim to enhance marginal adaptation and reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses at the adhesive interface, thereby potentially minimizing pulpal irritation and postoperative discomfort.

Participants in this study are adult patients requiring Class II resin composite restorations on two comparable posterior teeth, typically located on opposite sides of the dental arch. Each participant will receive two restorations, one using the snow-plow technique and the other using the resin coating technique, in a split-mouth design. This approach allows each participant to serve as their own control, minimizing inter-patient variability and enabling a more reliable comparison between the two restorative strategies.

All procedures are performed under rubber dam isolation using standardized adhesive and restorative protocols to ensure clinical consistency. The snow-plow technique involves placing an uncured flowable bulk-fill resin on the cavity floor, immediately followed by the placement of a packable composite increment. Both materials are then light-cured simultaneously. This technique is intended to improve adaptation of the restorative material to cavity walls, displace voids, and reduce microleakage.

In the resin coating technique, immediate dentin sealing is performed following cavity preparation. A thin layer of flowable bulk-fill resin is then applied over the sealed dentin and light-cured before the placement of the final packable composite increment. This layer acts as a stress-absorbing liner, providing a flexible interface that may protect the pulp and reduce the transmission of shrinkage stresses during polymerization.

Operator calibration and adherence to standardized protocols are emphasized to ensure uniformity. All restorations are carried out by a single experienced clinician using the same materials, instruments, and curing devices to reduce variability related to operator technique.

Postoperative discomfort is assessed using a standardized visual analog scale (VAS) during structured telephone interviews conducted at baseline (before treatment), 24 hours, 72 hours, and one week postoperatively. Interviews are performed by an assessor who is blinded to the restorative technique used for each tooth to minimize reporting bias. Participants are specifically instructed to evaluate each treated tooth independently without making side-by-side comparisons.

This study does not involve any experimental drugs or non-standard clinical procedures. Both restorative techniques are widely accepted in routine clinical practice and use materials that are commercially available and approved for dental use. The primary objective is to evaluate the early postoperative pain experience associated with each technique, rather than to introduce a novel material or intervention.

The findings of this study will contribute to a better understanding of how restorative technique selection influences postoperative sensitivity, potentially informing evidence-based clinical decision-making in restorative dentistry. By comparing two established but mechanistically distinct approaches, this trial aims to provide clinically relevant information that may help dentists optimize patient comfort following posterior resin composite placement.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Tooth Sensitivity Following Class II Composite Restorations

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

A randomized split-mouth clinical trial with two intervention arms (snow-plow and resin coating techniques) allocated to contralateral Class II cavities in the same patient. This crossover model minimizes inter-individual variability by enabling within-subject comparison under identical clinical conditions.

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

The outcomes assessor was blinded to the restorative technique used on each tooth. Telephone interviews were conducted using standardized scripts, and the interviewer was unaware of the allocation, referring to teeth by quadrant/side to minimize bias. The operator is not blinded due to the nature of the restorative procedures.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Snow-plow technique

Class II posterior cavities were restored using the snow-plow technique. After adhesive application, a thin layer of uncured flowable bulk-fill resin was placed on the gingival floor. A packable bulk-fill composite was then immediately inserted, displacing the flowable resin, and both were light-cured simultaneously. The occlusal anatomy was completed with packable composite, followed by finishing and polishing. Rubber-dam isolation and selective enamel etching with a universal adhesive were applied in all cases.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Snow-plow restorative technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The snow-plow technique involves placing a thin layer of uncured flowable bulk-fill resin on the gingival floor of a Class II cavity, immediately followed by placement of a packable bulk-fill composite. Both materials are light-cured simultaneously, allowing the flowable resin to fill voids and improve marginal adaptation.

Resin coating technique

Class II posterior cavities were restored using the resin coating technique following immediate dentin sealing. After adhesive application, a thin layer of flowable bulk-fill resin was applied and light-cured to create a stress-absorbing layer on the dentin surface. Packable bulk-fill composite was then used to restore the remaining cavity, followed by occlusal sculpting, finishing, and polishing. All procedures were performed under rubber-dam isolation with selective enamel etching and universal self-etch adhesive on dentin.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Resin coating restorative technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The resin coating technique involves applying and light-curing a thin layer of flowable bulk-fill resin after adhesive application to create a stress-absorbing layer on dentin (resin coating), followed by restoration with packable bulk-fill composite. This approach aims to protect the dentin, enhance bond stability, and reduce postoperative sensitivity

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Snow-plow restorative technique

The snow-plow technique involves placing a thin layer of uncured flowable bulk-fill resin on the gingival floor of a Class II cavity, immediately followed by placement of a packable bulk-fill composite. Both materials are light-cured simultaneously, allowing the flowable resin to fill voids and improve marginal adaptation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Resin coating restorative technique

The resin coating technique involves applying and light-curing a thin layer of flowable bulk-fill resin after adhesive application to create a stress-absorbing layer on dentin (resin coating), followed by restoration with packable bulk-fill composite. This approach aims to protect the dentin, enhance bond stability, and reduce postoperative sensitivity

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Snowplow technique Resin coating Immediate dentin sealing with flowable liner

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients aged 18-50 years.
* Systemically healthy individuals.
* Presence of two posterior teeth in different quadrants or contralateral sides of the same arch requiring Class II composite restorations.
* Teeth diagnosed with reversible pulpitis and vital pulps, confirmed clinically and radiographically.
* Teeth without previous restorations or carious lesions limited to dentin.
* Ability to provide informed consent and comply with study procedures and follow-up assessments.

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-vital teeth, teeth with signs of irreversible pulpitis, periapical pathology, or extensive loss of tooth structure.
* Patients with systemic conditions or medications that may influence pain perception, healing, or sensitivity (e.g., chronic pain syndromes, analgesic use, immunosuppressive therapy), or very poor oral hygiene.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
* Known allergy to dental materials used in the study.
* Inability to respond to follow-up calls or provide reliable pain assessments.
* Teeth with previous restorations, endodontic treatment, or cracks.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes