Effect of Silane Coupling on the Clinical Performance of Repaired Composite

NCT ID: NCT06005571

Last Updated: 2025-03-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

43 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-10

Study Completion Date

2024-09-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Research Problem : Advances in adhesive technologies have introduced several surface treatment concepts that enable the clinician to adhere resin-based composite restorations onto new composite materials. The service life of faulty direct composite restorations can be prolonged by composite repair wherein durable adhesion between old and new resin-based composite materials is established.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objectives : A randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to apply the latest results of evidence-based in vitro studies regarding resin-based repair protocol. The study aimed to assess the effect of adding silane coupling agent as a separate step on the clinical performance of repaired composite restorations and compare the results with those of using the usual etch and bond protocol.

Materials and Methods : 45 patients were recruited for this study from patients attending the restorative dentistry clinics for postgraduate students, Jordan University of Science and Technology. Each patient had at least two defected posterior composite restorations that are indicated for repair. With this selection, 116 restorations with localized anatomical deficiencies and/or secondary caries were randomly assigned into three groups according to the type of surface treatment each tooth will receive before the application of the new composite material (Filtek Z250,3M,USA). The teeth in the control group (n = 45): were treated with 37% phosphoric acid etching and conventional one step adhesive (Single Bond,3M,USA). In the Silane-Adhesive group (n = 26): teeth were treated with acid etching and silane coupling agent application (Bis-silane) prior to adhesive bond (Adper single bond). In the Sandblast-Silane-Adhesive group (n = 45): teeth were treated with intra-oral sandblasting and silane coupling agent application (Bis-silane) prior to (Adper Single Bond). The reason of repair, age of old restorations and the location of the restoration-repair interfaces were recorded for every failed restorations. Two examiners followed-up and evaluated the restoration quality after an average of 6 months using modified USPHS criteria. The results of clinical performance were assessed using Chi-square test.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Defective Composite Restorations

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Three groups of patients were randomly assigned to three different treatment protocols of defective composite restoration repair.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
The patients who participated in the study and the assessor of the treatment outcome did not know the type of treatment procedure received.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control: traditional acid etch treatment group

Traditional acid etching to the tooth and old restoration surfaces and then adhesive application.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

composite restoration repair by traditional acid etch treatment procedure and adhesive.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Recurrent caries surrounding the defective restoration was removed and the surfaces were coditoned with acid and adhesive then new repair composite was addded to repair the old restoration and restore the carious cavity.

Silane-Adhesive treatment group

Acid cid etching of prepared tooth tissues and old restoration surfaces, silane solution application, and then adhesive application.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Composite restoration repair by acid etching, silane solution application, and then adhesive.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Recurrent caries surrounding the defective restoration was removed and the surfaces were coditoned with acid, then silane applied, next adhesive then new repair composite was addded to repair the old restoration and restore the carious cavity.

Sandblast-Silane-Adhesive treatment group

First sandblasting the old composite filling surfaces, then acid etching of prepared tooth tissues the restoration, then silane application followed by adhesive application.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Composite restoration repair by sandblasting first, then acid etching, silane solution application, and then adhesive.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Recurrent caries surrounding the defective restoration was removed, the old restoration surface were sandblasted, and the tooth and restoration surfaces were coditoned with acid, then silane applied, next adhesive then new repair composite was added to repair the old restoration and restore the carious cavity.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

composite restoration repair by traditional acid etch treatment procedure and adhesive.

Recurrent caries surrounding the defective restoration was removed and the surfaces were coditoned with acid and adhesive then new repair composite was addded to repair the old restoration and restore the carious cavity.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Composite restoration repair by acid etching, silane solution application, and then adhesive.

Recurrent caries surrounding the defective restoration was removed and the surfaces were coditoned with acid, then silane applied, next adhesive then new repair composite was addded to repair the old restoration and restore the carious cavity.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Composite restoration repair by sandblasting first, then acid etching, silane solution application, and then adhesive.

Recurrent caries surrounding the defective restoration was removed, the old restoration surface were sandblasted, and the tooth and restoration surfaces were coditoned with acid, then silane applied, next adhesive then new repair composite was added to repair the old restoration and restore the carious cavity.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Deciduous tooth
* Sustained dentin hypersensitivity
* Irreversible pulpitis , necrotic, or inadequately-treated endodontic teeth
* Grossly defective composite restorations that were indicated for replacement.
* Teeth with compromised periodontal status.
* Patients with poor oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients older than 18 years.
* Asymptomatic restored premolars or molars.
* Vital or endodontically treated teeth
* Patients with localized, marginal, anatomical deficiencies and/or carious lesions adjacent to composite restorations or esthetically unpleasant restorations.
* Teeth with marginal gingivitis but healthy periodontium.
* Tooth in normal occlusion with antagonist and at least one adjacent tooth.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jordan University of Science and Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

King Abdullah University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zakereyya Albashaireh

Professor of restorative dentistry

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zakereyya Albashaireh, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Jordan University of Science and Technology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jordan University of Science and Technology

Irbid, , Jordan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Jordan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Albashaireh ZSM, Maghaireh GA, Alsaafeen HN. Effects of silane coupling treatment on the clinical performance of direct repaired resin-based composite (RBC) restorations with or without prior surface sandblasting: A randomized controlled trial. J Dent. 2023 Dec;139:104740. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104740. Epub 2023 Oct 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37816489 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20220082

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Esthetics of Dental Composite and Adhesive System
NCT03716349 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA