Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy of Morphine Gel to Treat Pain Associated With Perineal RadioDermatitis
NCT ID: NCT07207889
Last Updated: 2025-10-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
17 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-12-01
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Myofascial Release Combined With Acupressure on BL23 On Chronic Perineal Pain
NCT07117019
Acupuncture for Pain Management During Uterine Aspiration
NCT03391986
Effect of Playing an Audio Clip for Pain and Anxiety Control in Patients While Dressing Burn Wounds
NCT05515302
Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Postoperative Analgesia: A Randomized, Triple-Masked, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study
NCT05399355
Clinical Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.
NCT06290661
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Skin exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) during the treatment of tumors close to the cutaneous surface is no longer able to renew itself due to an alteration in the basal cell mitotic process, leading to suppression of skin cell renewal. IR also induces senescence of epidermal keratinocytes, responsible for exacerbated inflammatory activity and structural dysfunction of the epidermal barrier, through disruption of the keratinization and cornification process. (2).
RD usually heals ad integrum. They are classified into 5 grades according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 (3), presenting different clinical aspects ranging from grade I to V.
Grade II and III RDs are frequently observed in patients undergoing perineal RT, especially as medical treatment is associated.
In addition to the tumor's proximity to the skin, several anatomical factors specific to the perineal region contribute to the occurrence of these RDs: a wetter area, with skin folds, subject to friction and the presence of the urinary and anal orifices, potential sources of irritation by the elimination of urine and feces.
These RD are painful and have a significant impact on patients' quality of life (4,5,6). Pain intensity is often underestimated prior to treatment (7). The discomfort and pain experienced during RT intensify over the course of the sessions (8). Although RD is a frequent acute toxicity in patients treated for perineal tumors, there are few studies describing the impact of RD-related pain. The treatment of pain in RT must be rigorously assessed, and appropriate systemic or local therapy proposed (9). The challenge in treating pain in perineal radiodermatitis (PDR) is to ensure the full administration of the initial RT treatment regimen, which in the event of long interruption or premature discontinuation would expose the patient to a greater risk of recurrence (10-12).
Despite the studies carried out, there is no consensus on local care for the prevention or treatment of DR. However, the topicals used should not compromise the efficacy of RT, and should optimize healing, with gels being the preferred form.
This is why a dedicated care circuit has been set up at the Institut Curie to optimize preventive skin care and monitoring of tolerance to ROP. This system enables the early detection of painful ROP refractory to the prescribed systemic treatment.
In case of painful RD: patients are offered a hydrogel preparation mixed with morphine for local relief. Patients apply this preparation themselves during the day.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of morphine gel (GM) in the treatment of pain in PRD. The primary endpoint is the patient's self-reported reduction in pain. Secondary objectives include evaluation of systemic analgesic prescription and analysis of treatment interruptions attributable to DR.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients using morphine gel
patients who received morphine gel to treat pain due to perineal radiodermatitis
morphine chlorhydrate in intrasite gel
The use of Morphine gel to treat painfull perineal radiodermatitis is new. None clinical study was conducted to explore the efficacy of the morphine gel as local analgesic for these cutaneous toxicity due to radiotherapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
morphine chlorhydrate in intrasite gel
The use of Morphine gel to treat painfull perineal radiodermatitis is new. None clinical study was conducted to explore the efficacy of the morphine gel as local analgesic for these cutaneous toxicity due to radiotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Use of a local analgesic treatment based on Morphine gel for pain associated with perineal radiodermatitis.
* Patients not relieved by prescribed systemic treatments (per-os or intravenous)
* Patients treated with radiotherapy for a perineal tumor, whether or not associated with medical treatment such as chemotherapy.
* Minimum grade of radiodermatitis: Grade II
Exclusion Criteria
* Minor patients
* Patients using morphine gel for wounds other than radiodermatitis
* Patients who object to the re-use of their data
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institut Curie
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elodie LABEDADE
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institut Curie
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut Curie
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DATA240316 ANTAGEL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.