Effect Study of SMART Treatment for Youth

NCT ID: NCT07200713

Last Updated: 2025-10-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-25

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Sensory motor arousal regulation treatment (SMART) works better than treatment as usual (TAU) to treat youth 7-17 years with complex trauma histories and self-regulation difficulties. The study also will investigate which patients will benefit more from SMART (treatment effect heterogeneity) and whether therapeutic alliance mediates effect. The main hypotheses the trial aims to answer are:

1. Main effects: The SMART model approach will be more effective than ordinary treatment (control condition), in terms of improvement from therapy starts to 6 and 12 months follow up, for:

1. Regulatory capacities of emotions and bodily states, attention and behavior, and self and social relations
2. Trauma symptoms of re-experiencing, avoidance/ numbness and hyperarousal and sense of threat (core PTSD symptoms) and disturbances in self-organization (affect, self-concept; relations - core complex PTSD symptoms)
3. Internalizing symptoms (somatic complaints, anxiety symptoms and depression symptom severity) and Externalizing symptoms (conduct problems, aggression, inattention, and social problem severity)
4. Psychosocial strengths - prosocial behavior, subjective well-being and impairment in peer relationships, family relationships, and academic/school functioning
2. Exploration of mediation: When comparing SMART and ordinary treatment (TAU), (i) therapeutic alliance is higher in SMART, and (ii) a better treatment effect in SMART is partially mediated by therapeutic alliance

3\. Exploration of treatment effect heterogeneity (moderators): Effects of SMART treatment compared to TAU vary between: patients with low versus high level of self-regulation difficulties (full vs partial Developmental trauma disorder), patients with extensive vs less extensive developmental trauma exposure, adolescents (13-17 years) vs younger children (7-12 years), and patients exposed to trauma early in life vs in their teens

At each site, eligible participants are randomized to SMART or ordinary treatment/ TAU. Investigators acquire study data at baseline and outcome data at follow up after 6 and 12 months, and measure therapeutic alliance twice during the treatment process.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Specialized mental health services often fall short in adequate treatment of youth with developmental trauma histories. These youth are often difficult to treat due to composite mental and somatic problems. A promising treatment model for the group is the SMART approach, which utilizes sensory motor therapeutic equipment in a specialized room to support youths' natural ways of regulating bodies and emotions. This may facilitate therapeutic bond, improve regulation of arousal, and facilitate a more effective processing of trauma. The study will test the effectiveness of SMART treatment for young people 7-17 years old with developmental trauma and self-regulation difficulties in a two-group RCT. The investigators hypothesize that the SMART approach is more effective than ordinary treatment for an array of outcome measures, including regulatory capacities, attention and behavior; trauma symptoms; and internalizing and externalizing symptoms. The study also will explore if therapeutic alliance mediates treatment effects and heterogeneity of treatment effects (moderator analyses). The study will include 120 children/ adolescents with developmental trauma exposure and difficulties in self-regulatory capacities from four units at dpt. of child and adolescent mental health, Vestre Viken, randomized to SMART or ordinary treatment. This first RCT of SMART for youth has the potential to test whether the model should be adopted as standard treatment for youth in the target group in Norway and internationally.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stress Disorders, Traumatic Psychological Trauma Sexual Trauma Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Mental Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

At each of four study sites, the study uses blocked randomization with alternating block sizes of 4 and 6.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sensory motor arousal regulation treatment (SMART)

Treatment using SMART rooms and associated SMART techniques

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sensory motor arousal regulation treatment (SMART)

Intervention Type OTHER

Psychological treatment using SMART room and associated techniques

Treatment as usual (TAU)

Best practice ordinary treatment without using SMART approaches

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Treatment as usual (TAU)

Intervention Type OTHER

Best practice ordinary psychological treatment

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Treatment as usual (TAU)

Best practice ordinary psychological treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Sensory motor arousal regulation treatment (SMART)

Psychological treatment using SMART room and associated techniques

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

These are based on the Developmental Trauma Disorder Semistructured Interview (DTD-SI), which has four domains (A-D). Based on the DTD-SI, which is detailed below, inclusion requires:

* The presence of developmental trauma history (domain A)
* One symptom in each of the domains B-D
* At least four symptoms (of a maximum 15) in domains B-D considered together

Domains A to D above refers to the following:

* Domain A. Lifetime contemporaneous exposure to developmental trauma, defined as either (i) Interpersonal victimization: physical or sexual abuse or assault, domestic/intimate partner violence, bullying, harassment, exploitation, trafficking, hate crimes, or racial/ethnic/identity trauma, or (ii) Primary caregiving system attachment disruption: caregiver change or prolonged separation, gross neglect (physical, medical, emotional), psychological maltreatment (emotional abuse, emotional neglect, parental hostility or over-controlling), caregiver impairment due to mental illness or substance abuse, or chronic medical condition (by child or caregiver)
* Domain B. Affective and somatic dysregulation: (i) Emotion dysregulation, (ii) Somatic dysregulation, (iii) Impaired awareness or dissociation of emotions and body, (iv) Impaired capacity to describe emotions or bodily states
* Domain C. Attentional and behavioral dysregulation: (i) Threat-related rumination, (ii) Impaired capacity for self protection, (iii) Maladaptive self-soothing, (iv) Habitual or reactive self-harm, (v) Inability to initiate or sustain goal-directed behavior
* Domain D. Self and relational dysregulation: (i) Persistent extreme negative self-perception, (ii) attachment insecurity and disorganization, (iii) Extreme persistent distrust, defiance or lack of reciprocity in close relationships, (iv) Reactive physical or verbal aggression, (v) Psychological boundary deficits, (vi) Impaired capacity to regulate empathic arousal

Exclusion Criteria

* Active psychosis
* Not fluent in Norwegian language
* Developmental challenges - IQ \< 70
* Has previously used SMART room
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vestre Viken Hospital Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roar Fosse, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vestre Viken Hospital Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dpt of Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) Vestre Viken - Asker

Asker, Akershus, Norway

Site Status

Dpt of Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) Vestre Viken - Ringerike Ål

Ål, Buskerud, Norway

Site Status

Dpt of Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) Vestre Viken - Drammen

Drammen, Buskerud, Norway

Site Status

Dpt of Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) Vestre Viken - Kongsberg

Kongsberg, Buskerud, Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Roar Fosse, Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

+47 95008051

Maria M Mahlum, Psy.D.

Role: CONTACT

+47 90088284

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Maria M Mahlum, Psy.D

Role: primary

+47 90088284

Monika Kleven, Psy.D

Role: primary

+47 90121036

Maria M Mahlum, Psy.D

Role: primary

+47 90088284

Margrerthe B Brenna, Psy.D

Role: primary

+47 94368057

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

881408

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.