Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-25
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Main effects: The SMART model approach will be more effective than ordinary treatment (control condition), in terms of improvement from therapy starts to 6 and 12 months follow up, for:
1. Regulatory capacities of emotions and bodily states, attention and behavior, and self and social relations
2. Trauma symptoms of re-experiencing, avoidance/ numbness and hyperarousal and sense of threat (core PTSD symptoms) and disturbances in self-organization (affect, self-concept; relations - core complex PTSD symptoms)
3. Internalizing symptoms (somatic complaints, anxiety symptoms and depression symptom severity) and Externalizing symptoms (conduct problems, aggression, inattention, and social problem severity)
4. Psychosocial strengths - prosocial behavior, subjective well-being and impairment in peer relationships, family relationships, and academic/school functioning
2. Exploration of mediation: When comparing SMART and ordinary treatment (TAU), (i) therapeutic alliance is higher in SMART, and (ii) a better treatment effect in SMART is partially mediated by therapeutic alliance
3\. Exploration of treatment effect heterogeneity (moderators): Effects of SMART treatment compared to TAU vary between: patients with low versus high level of self-regulation difficulties (full vs partial Developmental trauma disorder), patients with extensive vs less extensive developmental trauma exposure, adolescents (13-17 years) vs younger children (7-12 years), and patients exposed to trauma early in life vs in their teens
At each site, eligible participants are randomized to SMART or ordinary treatment/ TAU. Investigators acquire study data at baseline and outcome data at follow up after 6 and 12 months, and measure therapeutic alliance twice during the treatment process.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Pilot Study of a Blended Intervention Targeting Emotion Dysregulation in Adults with ADHD
NCT05644028
Testing the Effect of the Youth Mindful Awareness Program on Negative Affect
NCT04718129
Two-year Follow-up of a Mindfulness-based Intervention in Children.
NCT04806542
Stress-free Everyday LiFe for Children and Adolescents REsearch
NCT04208113
Optimization of a Mobile Transdiagnostic Emotion Regulation Intervention for University Students
NCT05576883
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sensory motor arousal regulation treatment (SMART)
Treatment using SMART rooms and associated SMART techniques
Sensory motor arousal regulation treatment (SMART)
Psychological treatment using SMART room and associated techniques
Treatment as usual (TAU)
Best practice ordinary treatment without using SMART approaches
Treatment as usual (TAU)
Best practice ordinary psychological treatment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Treatment as usual (TAU)
Best practice ordinary psychological treatment
Sensory motor arousal regulation treatment (SMART)
Psychological treatment using SMART room and associated techniques
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The presence of developmental trauma history (domain A)
* One symptom in each of the domains B-D
* At least four symptoms (of a maximum 15) in domains B-D considered together
Domains A to D above refers to the following:
* Domain A. Lifetime contemporaneous exposure to developmental trauma, defined as either (i) Interpersonal victimization: physical or sexual abuse or assault, domestic/intimate partner violence, bullying, harassment, exploitation, trafficking, hate crimes, or racial/ethnic/identity trauma, or (ii) Primary caregiving system attachment disruption: caregiver change or prolonged separation, gross neglect (physical, medical, emotional), psychological maltreatment (emotional abuse, emotional neglect, parental hostility or over-controlling), caregiver impairment due to mental illness or substance abuse, or chronic medical condition (by child or caregiver)
* Domain B. Affective and somatic dysregulation: (i) Emotion dysregulation, (ii) Somatic dysregulation, (iii) Impaired awareness or dissociation of emotions and body, (iv) Impaired capacity to describe emotions or bodily states
* Domain C. Attentional and behavioral dysregulation: (i) Threat-related rumination, (ii) Impaired capacity for self protection, (iii) Maladaptive self-soothing, (iv) Habitual or reactive self-harm, (v) Inability to initiate or sustain goal-directed behavior
* Domain D. Self and relational dysregulation: (i) Persistent extreme negative self-perception, (ii) attachment insecurity and disorganization, (iii) Extreme persistent distrust, defiance or lack of reciprocity in close relationships, (iv) Reactive physical or verbal aggression, (v) Psychological boundary deficits, (vi) Impaired capacity to regulate empathic arousal
Exclusion Criteria
* Not fluent in Norwegian language
* Developmental challenges - IQ \< 70
* Has previously used SMART room
7 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vestre Viken Hospital Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Roar Fosse, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Vestre Viken Hospital Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dpt of Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) Vestre Viken - Asker
Asker, Akershus, Norway
Dpt of Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) Vestre Viken - Ringerike Ål
Ål, Buskerud, Norway
Dpt of Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) Vestre Viken - Drammen
Drammen, Buskerud, Norway
Dpt of Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) Vestre Viken - Kongsberg
Kongsberg, Buskerud, Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
881408
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.