The Building Resilience Program: Examining Self-Regulation, Behavior, and Resilience in Under-Resourced Preschoolers With ACEs
NCT ID: NCT07170605
Last Updated: 2025-09-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
38 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-10-01
2024-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a occupational therapy-led trauma-informed care intervention can improve resilience, self-regulation, coping skills, and emotional health in preschoolers ages 2-4 years from under-resourced neighborhoods with a history of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and their caregivers. The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does the Building Resilience Program (BRP) improve stress management, self-regulation, positive affect, engagement, self-efficacy, coping skills and resilience in preschool children?
* Does the Building Resilience Program (BRP) improve resilience, emotional management, and coping strategies in caregivers?
Researchers will compare the Building Resilience Program group to a school readiness skills comparison group to see if the trauma-informed intervention produces greater improvements in resilience and related outcomes.
Participants will:
* Complete pre- and post-intervention assessments measuring resilience, coping skills, emotional health, occupational engagement, and quality of life
* Attend 40-60 minute group sessions, 3x a week for 8 weeks (children will participate in either the BRP intervention or school readiness comparison group)
* Complete individualized Goal Attainment Scaling to track personal progress (children)
* Attend 2-3 in-person caregiver group sessions during the 8-week intervention period plus pre- and post-intervention meetings (caregivers)
* Complete a program evaluation questionnaire at the end of the study (caregivers)
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Resilience Clinic Evaluation
NCT05690256
Rise With Resilience
NCT07217275
Efficacy of Mountain Craft Training at Enhancing the Resilience and Physio-psychological Well-being of Children From Low-income Families
NCT06286787
Unfolding the Wisdom Within: CFT for Adolescents in Residential Care
NCT06219057
Brief Interventions for Coping with Distress
NCT05779761
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
ACEs related to poverty and low socioeconomic status include experiencing abuse, neglect, witnessing violence or mental illness, food or housing instability, and incarceration of a parent or caregiver. These experiences can severely impact overall quality of life, mental health, and often lead to developmental delays and long-term effects. When parents themselves were impacted by ACEs, it can lead to intergenerational transmission of negative effects.
The American Academy of Pediatrics has specifically identified the critical need to provide interventions that build resilience and address maladaptive responses due to toxic stress resulting from ACEs. Occupational therapists are particularly well-suited to integrate trauma-informed care (TIC) into service delivery through direct intervention and by embedding strategies within occupational engagement, particularly through play as the primary occupation for young children.
Study Design and Innovation This pilot study builds on a prior feasibility study conducted at the YWCA (Young Women's Christian Association) of Cleveland between April-June 2022. The Building Resilience Program (BRP) manual was originally developed for school-age children with chronic pain and was modified to be age and content appropriate for preschoolers ages 2-4 years with trauma history.
The study employs a randomized two-group pre-posttest comparison waitlist design. Given the maximum enrollment of approximately 40 participants at the YWCA Early Learning Center, the study cannot account for all factors that could introduce bias, but the use of a comparison, non-BRP condition will allow comparison between groups over time and account for potential maturation effects. The comparison group will participate in a basic school readiness skills group that excludes resilience training components to avoid contaminating the intervention protocol while providing similar positive adult interactions that could introduce bias.
Intervention Protocols Included both the Building Resilience Program (BRP) primary intervention and the School Readiness Comparison Protocol. In parallel with participants in the BRP condition, caregivers also participate in 2-3 weekly modules in a separate, caregiver group.
Caregiver Component Based on feasibility study findings showing challenges with weekly caregiver participation, the caregiver requirement has been reduced to 2-3 in-person sessions over 8 weeks, combined with incentives and supports to encourage participation. The BRP manual includes weekly parent activities corresponding with child activities.
Caregiver sessions will be conducted by occupational therapists and occupational therapy students, combining materials for in-person sessions as follows:
1. Pre-intervention meeting: BRP and study description, introduction to resilience, highlights from Inside Out movie, Zones of Regulation overview, Q\&A
2. Week 3 session: family resilience, high vs. low resilience, resiliency BINGO activity, Kawa River model, Q\&A
3. Week 6 session: adaptive vs. maladaptive behaviors, coping strategies, mindfulness, sensory processing and "sensory solutions," community resources
4. Post-intervention meeting: child and self-advocacy, joint plant activity, program review
Recruitment Strategies
Recruitment lessons learned from the feasibility study have informed enhanced strategies:
1. Extended recruitment period from October-December 2023
2. Multiple meeting options: 18 total meetings (3 evening, lunch, and weekend options offered both in-person and virtually)
3. Comprehensive incentive structure: meals and refreshments at in-person meetings, travel compensation (bus passes), optional childcare, small gift card incentives for families completing consent forms and pre-test packets regardless of meeting attendance
4. Multiple distribution methods: paper packets sent home for families unable to attend meetings, with research team available via telephone or email for questions Previously, for the feasibility study participants were recruited by YWCA staff using classroom apps and paper packets, with caregiver pretest documents completed only when gift card incentives were offered. No caregivers participated in weekly Zoom sessions when no incentives were provided.
Statistical Analysis Plan Child Participants (Aim 1)
Each measure will be treated as a continuous variable with six measurement points (excluding Goal Attainment Scaling documented weekly and analyzed over all 8 weeks of BRP participation). Three primary analyses will be conducted:
1. Intervention Effect for Group A: Repeated Measures MANOVA (multivariate analysis of variance) comparing multiple dependent/outcome variables before and after BRP intervention
2. Intervention Effect for Group B: Repeated Measures MANOVA comparing multiple dependent/outcome variables before and after BRP intervention
3. Combined Intervention Effect: Repeated Measures MANCOVA assessing differences between Groups A and B across all measures following BRP intervention, controlling for school readiness program effects for Group B Goal Attainment Scaling T-scores will be calculated according to best practice protocols, with charts created to visualize changes over time, providing individualized, client-centered program measurement for intervention.
Caregiver Participants (Aim 2) Pre-posttest comparisons will be made using MANCOVA approach for multiple dependent variables, with baseline Social Support Survey Instrument scores included as a covariate to control for social support effects on caregivers' emotion management abilities and adaptive coping skills demonstration.
Implementation Considerations
Anticipated Challenges and Mitigation Strategies
1. Irregular attendance: Intervention provided twice weekly to increase exposure opportunities
2. Recruitment and form completion: Additional incentives available if needed, with flexible meeting scheduling options
3. Unidentified diagnoses in preschool participants: Goal Attainment Scaling will address different performance skills and individualize program goals and activities
4. Language barriers: Adapted materials may be needed for caregivers not speaking English as first language, with YWCA community partner guidance for resolution strategies
Community Partnership The YWCA Early Learning Center serves as the on-site location, providing services to under-resourced families, almost all of whom have experienced homelessness and trauma. The YWCA does not currently provide occupational therapy services, making this collaboration an innovative approach to expanding trauma-informed care access in the community.
This study addresses major obstacles in engaging caregivers from under-resourced families who experience chronic stress due to underemployment, financial instability, unstable housing, unpredictable work schedules, and lack of financial resources including childcare. These caregivers cannot afford to volunteer time and efforts without appropriate supports and incentives.
Theoretical Framework The study is rooted in occupational therapy theory, resilience theory and science, with activities derived from existing literature. The program recognizes play as the primary occupation for preschoolers, introducing resiliency concepts through occupation-based intervention approaches. The trauma-informed care framework guides all intervention delivery, acknowledging the impact of trauma on development and the need for safe, supportive environments that promote healing and growth.
Expected Outcomes and Clinical Implications This pilot study will provide necessary data to understand effects of TIC-based intervention programs implemented by occupational therapists on social, emotional, mental health, coping abilities and life satisfaction in this vulnerable population. Results will inform parameters surrounding program implementation, including successes and challenges encountered, which are important for future effectiveness studies and translation into widespread clinical and community practice.
The study aligns with current funding agency priorities for mental health, resilience and trauma-informed care in pediatric populations, providing pilot data necessary for larger-scale funding applications that would support program implementation across multiple preschools and neighborhoods.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention - children receiving the 8-week Building Resilience Program
Out-of-classroom, small group intervention led by occupational therapists, implementation of the manualized BRP
Mental health, positive coping strategies promoting self-regulation and adaptive skills
The BRP manual includes eight modules delivered over eight weeks: introduction to resilience, identifying and communicating emotions, emotional regulation, coping strategies for self-regulation (2 parts), breath awareness/meditation, applying positive coping strategies, and review/group session with caregiver. Sessions utilize play as the primary occupation, introducing resiliency concepts through 40-60 minute sessions three times each week to provide repetition and application of concepts with multiple opportunities to review, repeat and apply.
Each BRP session will be implemented by two occupational therapists, one occupational therapy student, and one YWCA staff member. Group size has been determined to approach therapeutic limits with 8-10 students, requiring this staffing ratio for optimal intervention delivery.
Standard care or school readiness condition
This condition for the waitlist control condition was used to account for positive effects that might have been the result of interactions with an occupational therapist. This was designed specifically NOT to overlap with the constructs of the intervention condition and focused on other, more basic elements of school readiness unrelated to mental health, social emotional learning or trauma.
Standard care/School Readiness Condition
The School Readiness protocol supplements existing preschool curriculum while mitigating positive researcher interaction effects. Sessions start with a song and warm-up, including active listening, sharing and turn-taking while targeting different domains each week: perceptual motor, fine motor (tool use), fine motor (coloring), problem solving, teamwork, coordination and motor planning, problem solving (teams), and gross and fine motor (teams). These skills were selected based on feasibility study observations and designed not to overlap with social-emotional skills embedded in the BRP.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mental health, positive coping strategies promoting self-regulation and adaptive skills
The BRP manual includes eight modules delivered over eight weeks: introduction to resilience, identifying and communicating emotions, emotional regulation, coping strategies for self-regulation (2 parts), breath awareness/meditation, applying positive coping strategies, and review/group session with caregiver. Sessions utilize play as the primary occupation, introducing resiliency concepts through 40-60 minute sessions three times each week to provide repetition and application of concepts with multiple opportunities to review, repeat and apply.
Each BRP session will be implemented by two occupational therapists, one occupational therapy student, and one YWCA staff member. Group size has been determined to approach therapeutic limits with 8-10 students, requiring this staffing ratio for optimal intervention delivery.
Standard care/School Readiness Condition
The School Readiness protocol supplements existing preschool curriculum while mitigating positive researcher interaction effects. Sessions start with a song and warm-up, including active listening, sharing and turn-taking while targeting different domains each week: perceptual motor, fine motor (tool use), fine motor (coloring), problem solving, teamwork, coordination and motor planning, problem solving (teams), and gross and fine motor (teams). These skills were selected based on feasibility study observations and designed not to overlap with social-emotional skills embedded in the BRP.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
24 Months
66 Months
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cleveland State University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kelle DeBoth Foust
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cleveland State University
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lynch, B. P., Brokamp, K. M., Scheerer, C. R., Bishop, M., Stauble, L., Hagedorn, B., & Endres, L. (2021). Outcomes of Occupational Therapy in Trauma-Informed Care. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 1-17.
Pitt, C., Luger, R., Bullen, A., Phillips, D., & Geiger, M. (2013). Parents as partners: Building collaborations to support the development of school readiness skills in under-resourced communities. South African Journal of Education, 33(4), 1-14.
Logan B, Jegatheesan D, Viecelli A, Pascoe E, Hubbard R. Goal attainment scaling as an outcome measure for randomised controlled trials: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 22;12(7):e063061. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063061.
Liu M, Luong L, Lachaud J, Edalati H, Reeves A, Hwang SW. Adverse childhood experiences and related outcomes among adults experiencing homelessness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2021 Nov;6(11):e836-e847. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00189-4. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
Crouch, E., Jones, J., Strompolis, M., & Merrick, M. (2020). Examining the association between ACEs, childhood poverty and neglect, and physical and mental health: Data from two state samples. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105155.
Creamer, J., Shrider, E. A., Burns, K., & Chen, F. (2022). Poverty in the United States: 2021. US Census Bureau.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form: Parent-Guardian Consent for Child Participation
Document Type: Informed Consent Form: Caregiver Consent for Self Participation
Document Type: Informed Consent Form: Child Assent Script
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Study protocols for the Child and Youth Resilience Measure (CYRM) and Adult Resilience Measure (ARM)
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AOTFIRG23DeBoth
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IRB-FY2022-23
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.