Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
116 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-12-19
2025-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Relationship Between Disability, Fear Avoidance Beliefs, Physical Performance and Quality of Life in Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT06869668
Relationship Between Kinesiophobia, Physical Activity and Disability Level and Pain Management in Patients With CLBP
NCT06125496
Pain Education Added to Conventional Physiotherapy Program for Patients With Neck Pain
NCT05210257
Answerability and Minimal Clinical Significance of the Pain Questionnaires
NCT06271447
Assessment of Musculoskeletal Pain and Psychosocial Status of Athletes
NCT03628547
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This cross-sectional analytical study was designed to evaluate the interrelationships between pain beliefs, health beliefs regarding complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), and spiritual well-being in patients attending a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PMR) outpatient clinic.
Rationale:
Chronic musculoskeletal pain is among the most frequent reasons for PMR admission. Prior research has examined pain beliefs, CAM utilization, or spirituality separately, yet little is known about their combined influence on patient coping, psychological status, and treatment orientation. Understanding these multidimensional factors is essential for advancing holistic, patient-centered rehabilitation strategies.
Study Design and Methods:
The study was conducted at Yozgat Bozok University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of PMR. A cross-sectional analytical design was employed. Eligible participants were adults aged 18-65 years who were literate, cognitively intact, and consented voluntarily. Exclusion criteria included communication or cognitive impairments, refusal to participate, or age outside the inclusion range.
Assessments:
Participants completed standardized, validated Turkish versions of the following instruments:
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): evaluation of anxiety and depression symptoms.
Pain Beliefs Questionnaire (PBQ): assessment of organic and psychological pain beliefs.
Complementary, Alternative, and Conventional Medicine Attitude Scale (CACMAS): evaluation of attitudes toward CAM and conventional medicine.
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire (CHBQ): assessment of CAM-related health beliefs.
Three-Factor Spiritual Well-Being Scale (TFSWBS): measurement of transcendence, harmony with nature, and anomie.
Statistical Plan:
Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographic and clinical variables. Group comparisons were performed using Student's t-test, ANOVA, or chi-square tests, as appropriate. Correlation analyses explored associations among psychological, cognitive, and spiritual outcomes. Multiple regression models were applied to identify predictors of CAM health beliefs and spiritual well-being. Sample size was determined a priori using G\*Power (version 3.1.9.7) to achieve 95% power with five predictors at α = 0.05.
Expected Contribution:
By integrating cognitive, psychological, and spiritual dimensions, the study seeks to clarify how pain beliefs and CAM health beliefs relate to spiritual well-being in rehabilitation patients. Findings are expected to support the incorporation of structured spiritual assessments and evidence-based CAM counseling into PMR practice to enhance holistic pain management.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Rehabilitation Outpatients
Adult patients (18-65 years) attending a university hospital Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic. Participants were evaluated once using self-report questionnaires and scales
Questionnaire Administration
Participants completed a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire, the Complementary, Alternative, and Conventional Medicine Attitude Scale, the Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Scale, and the Three-Factor Spiritual Well-Being Scale.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Questionnaire Administration
Participants completed a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire, the Complementary, Alternative, and Conventional Medicine Attitude Scale, the Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Scale, and the Three-Factor Spiritual Well-Being Scale.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Attending the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic
* Able to read and write
* Cognitively intact
* Voluntarily willing to participate and able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Illiterate individuals
* Individuals with cognitive impairment
* Individuals with communication difficulties
* Patients who declined to participate or had incomplete data
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Gulseren Demir Karakilic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gulseren Demir Karakilic
Assistant Professor, Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gülseren Demir Karakılıç, Asst Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yozgat Bozok University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yozgat Bozok University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Yozgat, Yozgat, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Uslu, F. (2020). Geleneksel ve tamamlayıcı tıp (getat) sağlık inanış anketinin türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. (Uzmanlık Tezi). Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Ankara Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Sağlık Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Aile Hekimliği Kliniği, Ankara. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/ sayfasından erişilmiştir. (Tez Numarası 644233).
Elif, K. Ö. S. E., Hasan Çetin Ekerbiçer, and Ünal Erkorkmaz. "Complementary, alternative and conventional medicine attitude scale: Turkish validity reliability study." Sakarya Tıp Dergisi 8.4 (2018): 726-736.
Hyland ME, Lewith GT, Westoby C. Developing a measure of attitudes: the holistic complementary and alternative medicine questionnaire. Complement Ther Med. 2003 Mar;11(1):33-8. doi: 10.1016/s0965-2299(02)00113-9.
Edwards LC, Pearce SA, Turner-Stokes L, Jones A. The Pain Beliefs Questionnaire: an investigation of beliefs in the causes and consequences of pain. Pain. 1992 Dec;51(3):267-272. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90209-T.
Aydemir, O. J. T. P. D: Hastane Anksiyete ve Depresyon Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 8, 187-280, 1997.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
Okan N, Kose N, Kardas S. Spiritual Contradiction Scale: A New Way of Understanding Internal and External Contradictions. J Relig Health. 2024 Apr;63(2):1567-1584. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01924-2. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
Berk HO, Bahadir G. [The experience of chronic pain and pain beliefs]. Agri. 2007 Oct;19(4):5-15. Turkish.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-GOKAEK-2415_2024.12.18_29
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.