A-B-C Program for Sedentary Older Adults With Depressive Symptoms
NCT ID: NCT07176637
Last Updated: 2025-09-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-30
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Role of Exercise in Depression in Middle Aged and Older Adults
NCT01573728
Automatic Reaction to Physical Activity and Sedentary Stimuli in Aging
NCT05704660
Reshaping the Path of Mild Cognitive Impairment by Refining Exercise Prescription
NCT02737878
The Seniors COvid-19 Pandemic and Exercise Study
NCT04412343
Promoting Seniors' Health With Home Care Aides
NCT03301116
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conversely, physical inactivity is a significant risk factor for morbidity and mortality, including risk for depression (Kamphuis et al., 2007). In addition, physical inactivity carries a high economic burden: the total healthcare costs of physical inactivity in Canada is $9.3 billion CAD annually (Janssen, 2012). Moreover, the prevalence of physical inactivity significantly increases with age. In addition to the high prevalence of inactivity in the general population, depression is an independent disabling condition that frequently presents with reduced energy, low motivation, and decreased levels of physical activity. Therefore, people with depression are even more commonly inactive. However, there is a positive association between PA and reduced depression: a recent systematic review and meta-analysis by Pearce and colleagues (2022), explored the association between PA and the risk of depression among adults. This meta-analysis included 15 prospective cohort studies and 191,130 participants in prospective studies with a minimum of 3-years follow-up; it showed a significant improvement in depressive symptoms in adults who engaged in PA even in low doses, below the recommended dose in the PA health guidelines, compared to adults who reported no PA (Pearce et al., 2022). The suggested impact of PA at any dose on reduced depressive symptoms may suggest the importance of encouraging patients to be physically active even at lower doses than the PA health guidelines.
The Active Lifestyle using Behavioral Economics based Cognitive Biases (A-B-C) study program was recently developed with purpose to efficiently implement and maintain an active lifestyle. It is unique due to the aim of identifying barriers in maintaining a physically active lifestyle, and targeting the process of decision making, with focus on Behavioral Economics (B/E) concepts, as opposed to behavior change or behavioral activation. It integrates concepts from B/E, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Logotherapy, in a 4-week program aimed at promoting an active lifestyle among sedentary adults with depressive symptoms. In this pilot study, we expect that this brief 4-week program will be effective in (1) promoting PA and (2) reducing depressive symptoms.
Participation in the A-B-C program carries minimal risk. Potential risks include psychological discomfort when discussing cognitive patterns or depressive symptoms, and mild physical discomfort from increased activity. However, these risks are expected to be low and will be mitigated by careful facilitation, screening, and referral mechanisms. Expected benefits include reduced depressive symptoms, increased motivation for physical activity, and improved cognitive-emotional awareness.
The A-B-C program is delivered in-person by a trained psychiatrist and includes twice-weekly, 60-minute sessions over four weeks. Measures include validated self-report questionnaires assessing depressive symptoms (e.g., PHQ-9), stress (PSS-10) and self-esteem (RSE), and self-reported logs of physical activity. Participants in the intervention also complete daily home assignments to reinforce session content. Follow-up assessments are conducted at baseline, post-intervention, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The control group receives an active comparator intervention consisting of general educational sessions about physical activity benefits and guidelines, matched for frequency, duration, and format. While the A-B-C program is a novel intervention, it draws upon evidence-based components validated in other contexts: behavioral economics interventions in health behavior change (Loewenstein et al., 2007), CBT for depression (Beck, 1979), and motivational programs using logotherapy principles (Frankl, 1985). No previous trials have tested this specific synthesis; this pilot study aims to establish preliminary efficacy.
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the 4-week "A-B-C" program in implementing and maintaining daily PA. We will explore outcomes for the effectiveness of the program, on (1) increasing the weekly duration of PA, and (2) reducing baseline depressive symptoms and other mental health outcomes among sedentary older adults with depressive symptoms at baseline. Specifically, we will evaluate the change in depressive symptoms, stress, and self-esteem from baseline, at the end of the 4-week intervention, and after additional 4 weeks from the end of the intervention (at follow-up). The intervention will be 4 weeks overall, with total of 8 sessions: the duration of each session will be 60 minutes each, and the frequency will be twice weekly for 4 weeks. The purpose of the study intervention is to explore the process of decision-making and automatic thoughts that are related to planning PA, and modify cognitive biases that may prevent a person from engaging in PA. Following participation in the study, we will conduct qualitative semi-structured interviews to establish a better understanding of the participants' subjective experience in the study, which will provide additional insight and may also suggest modifications to the program.
We hypothesize that the A-B-C Program will increase physical activity, reduce depressive symptoms, improve self-esteem, and reduce stress.
The objectives of the study are to determine the relative effectiveness of the program on the following measures, at 4 weeks from baseline (post-intervention) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-intervention (follow-up points) compared to baseline and to the control group:
1. Weekly dose of physical activity: daily duration and intensity of physical activity, measured by self-report in the daily program journal.
2. Depressive symptoms, as measured by the PHQ-9
3. Self-esteem, measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem (RSE) scale
4. Stress, measured by the Perceived-Stress-Scale (PSS)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A-B-C Group
The intervention group will be led by Dr. Klil-Drori, a staff academic psychiatrist in the Geriatric Department at The Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre. Dr. Klil-Drori completed clinical and research postdoctoral fellowships at McGill University and the University of Toronto, and developed the "A-B-C" program. The "A-B-C" program is a structured group intervention that meets twice weekly for four weeks, with each session lasting 60 minutes. Small groups of five participants will be facilitated by Dr. Klil-Drori. The program covers topics such as automatic thoughts and their associated emotions, common cognitive distortions (or cognitive biases), and how these influence decision-making and behaviour. Concepts introduced during sessions will be reinforced through structured group discussions and daily home practice assignments. The full outline for the A-B-C program, and the program journal can be found in 'Other Documents'.
A-B-C Program
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the 4-week "A-B-C" program in implementing and maintaining daily PA. We will explore outcomes for the effectiveness of the program, on (1) increasing the weekly duration of PA, and (2) reducing baseline depressive symptoms and other mental health outcomes among sedentary older adults with depressive symptoms at baseline. Specifically, we will evaluate the change in depressive symptoms, stress, and self-esteem from baseline, at the end of the 4-week intervention, and after additional 4 weeks from the end of the intervention (at follow-up). The intervention will be 4 weeks overall, with total of 8 sessions: the duration of each session will be 60 minutes each, and the frequency will be twice weekly for 4 weeks.
Physical activity education
The control group will serve as an sham active comparator, designed to control for group format, scheduled sessions, and social interaction. The agenda for the control group was designed to specifically function as a control to compare the A-B-C program. These participants will also attend twice-weekly 60-minute sessions over four weeks, focusing on educational content about the health benefits of physical activity and current physical activity guidelines.
The difference between the two interventions is that the control program is strictly educational, whereas the A-B-C program focuses on challenging cognitive biases that change decision making related to physical activity. To reiterate, the control program simply provides education on the effects of physical activity with physiological evidence.
Physical Activity Educational Program
The control group will serve as an sham active comparator, designed to control for group format, scheduled sessions, and social interaction. The agenda for the control group was designed to specifically function as a control to compare the A-B-C program. These participants will also attend twice-weekly 60-minute sessions over four weeks, focusing on educational content about the health benefits of physical activity and current physical activity guidelines.
The difference between the two interventions is that the control program is strictly educational, whereas the A-B-C program focuses on challenging cognitive biases that change decision making related to physical activity. To reiterate, the control program simply provides education on the effects of physical activity with physiological evidence.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
A-B-C Program
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the 4-week "A-B-C" program in implementing and maintaining daily PA. We will explore outcomes for the effectiveness of the program, on (1) increasing the weekly duration of PA, and (2) reducing baseline depressive symptoms and other mental health outcomes among sedentary older adults with depressive symptoms at baseline. Specifically, we will evaluate the change in depressive symptoms, stress, and self-esteem from baseline, at the end of the 4-week intervention, and after additional 4 weeks from the end of the intervention (at follow-up). The intervention will be 4 weeks overall, with total of 8 sessions: the duration of each session will be 60 minutes each, and the frequency will be twice weekly for 4 weeks.
Physical Activity Educational Program
The control group will serve as an sham active comparator, designed to control for group format, scheduled sessions, and social interaction. The agenda for the control group was designed to specifically function as a control to compare the A-B-C program. These participants will also attend twice-weekly 60-minute sessions over four weeks, focusing on educational content about the health benefits of physical activity and current physical activity guidelines.
The difference between the two interventions is that the control program is strictly educational, whereas the A-B-C program focuses on challenging cognitive biases that change decision making related to physical activity. To reiterate, the control program simply provides education on the effects of physical activity with physiological evidence.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
4\. Score on the PHQ-9 is between 2-14. 5. The participant agrees to attend all the meetings for the duration of the study, and to practice home assignments.
6\. Adequate command of English to be able to participate in the group sessions. 7. Current weekly duration of exercise\* ≤60 minutes/week. (\*Exercise: a specific type of physical activity \[PA\], which is structured, and has the intention of improving either health or fitness. Exercise differs from PA, which includes any physical effort, however without the intention of improving health or fitness \[e.g., driving, cleaning, standing, etc. are examples for PA, not exercise\]) 8. Participants have interest in increasing their weekly time of physical activity, and willingness to practice skills learned during the program.
9\. Agree to participate in any of the study groups according to a randomized allocation.
Exclusion Criteria
6\. Patients currently involved in routine intensive exercise\* \> 1 hour/ week. 7. Lack of interest to increase their daily time of physical activity 8. Refuse to participate in any of the study groups according to a randomized allocation.
9\. PHQ-9 score less than 2, or greater than 14.
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ROH-24-004
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
273
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.