Safety and Effectiveness of Antegrade Flexible Ureteroscopy-Assisted Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Staghorn Calculi

NCT ID: NCT07172373

Last Updated: 2025-09-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

420 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-01

Study Completion Date

2026-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL for the treatment of staghorn calculi, compared with standard PCNL.

Methods This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial plans to enroll 420 patients with staghorn calculi, randomly assigned into two groups: the experimental group (antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL, n=210) and the control group (standard PCNL, n=210). The primary endpoint is stone-free rate (defined as no residual fragment ≥2 mm on postoperative CT). Secondary endpoints include operative time, number of percutaneous tracts, rate of secondary procedures, hemoglobin decrease, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification), and length of hospital stay. All patients will undergo CT evaluation on postoperative day 2. Subgroup analysis will be performed according to the number of stone branches (≥5 vs \<5).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background Renal calculi are among the most common diseases in urology. Current treatment options include extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). For renal stones ≥2 cm, PCNL is the recommended first-line treatment.

However, because of the large stone burden and the involvement of multiple calyces, it is often difficult to achieve complete clearance with a single PCNL session. Excessive angulation of the nephroscope may increase the risk of infundibular tears and bleeding, and stones located in parallel or narrow infundibula may be difficult to access, reducing the one-stage stone-free rate. To improve outcomes, several strategies have been adopted:

Multiple percutaneous tracts: Establishing additional tracts allows access to calyces unreachable from the primary tract and increases stone-free rates. However, this also increases the risks of bleeding, infection, and injury to the kidney or adjacent organs. In addition, expansion of the first tract may cause perirenal hematoma or morphological changes due to urine extravasation, making subsequent punctures more challenging. Multiple tracts also prolong postoperative recovery and increase hospitalization costs. Staged procedures: The first PCNL session removes stones in the renal pelvis and accessible calyces, while residual stones are addressed in a second-stage retrograde ureteroscopy. This reduces the risks compared with multiple tracts, but prolongs the treatment cycle and increases costs. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) with modified patient positions: Positions such as the modified supine split-leg, lateral decubitus, or female-specific "Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia" allow simultaneous use of ureteroscopic and percutaneous approaches. This combines the efficiency of PCNL with the wide access angle of ureteroscopy, reduces the need for repositioning under anesthesia, and facilitates intraoperative monitoring. However, it requires two surgical teams, duplicate equipment, and high coordination, which may prolong operative time.

Previous studies suggest that combining single-tract PCNL with flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy may be an ideal approach for staghorn stones. While antegrade cystoscopic lithotripsy accommodates thicker fibers and offers faster irrigation and clearer visualization, the larger diameter of the cystoscope limits its passage through the ureter, risking residual fragments. Recently, antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL has been attempted, but most studies are small retrospective series or case reports. The limited adoption may be due to the high purchase and repair costs of reusable flexible ureteroscopes. The development of single-use ureteroscopes has largely overcome these barriers, providing a foundation for multicenter prospective studies.

Based on this background, a multicenter clinical study of antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL for staghorn calculi has important clinical value. Our preliminary work showed that when the number of stone branches was ≥5, the need for multiple tracts and staged procedures increased, while operative time was prolonged, hospital stay was longer, and the stone-free rate was reduced. We therefore further compared the efficacy of standard PCNL and antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL stratified by stone branch number.

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL in the treatment of staghorn calculi, compared with standard PCNL.

Study Overview Design This is a prospective, multicenter clinical study. Population

Inclusion criteria:

Diagnosis of staghorn calculi confirmed by non-contrast CT. Age ≥18 years. General condition suitable for surgery. Ability to understand and voluntarily sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria:

Solitary kidney or congenital anomalies (e.g., horseshoe kidney, ectopic kidney). Severe preoperative pyelonephritis. Psychiatric illness or lack of cooperation. Uncontrolled comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, hypertension) contraindicating surgery. Coagulation disorders. Investigator's judgment of unsuitability.

Withdrawal criteria:

Subject withdrawal: refusal to continue or loss to follow-up. Investigator withdrawal: complications making continuation unsafe, or poor compliance.

Sample size and grouping

A total of 420 patients will be enrolled across 14 centers (30 per center). Patients will be randomized into two groups:

Experimental group: antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL (n=210). Control group: standard PCNL (n=210).

Procedures All patients will undergo preoperative urine culture. Infected patients will receive targeted antibiotics until negative. Surgery will be performed under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation.

Standard PCNL group: Residual stones inaccessible through the primary tract will be managed by establishing a second or third tract.

Antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL group: Residual stones will first be managed using a flexible ureteroscope introduced via the established tract. The Tianjin Institute of Urology (TJIU) technique will be adopted, systematically inspecting all calyces and the ureter. Additional tracts will be created only if necessary.

At the end of surgery, a double-J stent and nephrostomy tube will be placed. Postoperative evaluation: Stone-free rate (no residual fragments ≥2 mm on CT on postoperative day 2). Operative time (from tract establishment to nephrostomy placement). Complications (Clavien-Dindo classification). Secondary procedures. Postoperative fever. Length of hospital stay. Subgroup analysis will be conducted based on the number of stone branches (≥5 vs \<5).

Endpoints Primary endpoint: Stone-free rate. Secondary endpoints: surgeon-perceived smoothness of operation, treatment satisfaction, rate of secondary procedures, operative time, number of tracts, hemoglobin decrease, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications.

Adverse Events

Definitions:

Adverse event (AE): any unfavorable medical occurrence after treatment, not necessarily causally related.

Serious adverse event (SAE): hospitalization, prolonged hospitalization, disability, life-threatening condition, death, or congenital anomaly.

Severity:

Mild: tolerable, no specific treatment needed. Moderate: requires intervention, directly affects recovery. Severe: life-threatening, fatal, or disabling, requiring emergency treatment.

Reporting:

All AEs/SAEs will be documented in case report forms with onset, presentation, management, and outcome. SAEs will be reported within 24 hours to the sponsor, ethics committee, and regulatory authorities.

Statistical Analysis This randomized, open-label, multicenter trial uses stone-free rate (CT on day 2, no fragments ≥2 mm) as the primary outcome. Based on preliminary data (stone-free rate \~52% for PCNL and \~71% for antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL), sample size was calculated with 90% power and α=0.025, requiring 157 patients per group. Allowing for 20% attrition, 210 patients per group (420 total) will be enrolled.

Data will be analyzed using R software (version 4.1.2). Continuous variables will be expressed as mean ± SD, categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Student's t-test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test will be used as appropriate. Two-sided p-values \<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urolithiasis Renal Stones

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Because of the inherent differences between the two interventions, blinding of patients and surgeons is not feasible. Postoperative imaging (CT) will be evaluated by radiologists blinded to treatment allocation, and clinical outcomes will be assessed by investigators who were not involved in the surgeries and remained unaware of the intervention. In addition, statistical analyses will be conducted in a blinded manner, with analysts kept unaware of group assignments until all analyses and interpretations are completed.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL

antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL

single PCNL

single PCNL

Group Type OTHER

single PCNL

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

single PCNL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL

antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

single PCNL

single PCNL

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Staghorn calculi confirmed by non-contrast CT of the urinary system; Age ≥18 years; General condition suitable for surgical treatment; Ability to understand and voluntarily sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

Solitary kidney or congenital anomalies (such as horseshoe kidney or ectopic kidney); Patients with severe preoperative pyelonephritis; Patients with psychiatric disorders or unwilling to cooperate; Patients with uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension who cannot tolerate surgery; Patients with coagulation disorders; Patients deemed unsuitable for participation in this trial by the investigator.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese PLA General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Peking University People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

First Hospital of China Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Beijing Tsinghua Changgeng Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wuhan TongJi Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tianjin Medical University Second Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yuanjiong Qi

Role: CONTACT

022-88328695

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

062/2025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.