Socket Shield Technique for Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement: A 6-Year Clinical Tria
NCT ID: NCT07171866
Last Updated: 2025-09-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-01
2025-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
SST is a surgical technique where a thin portion of the tooth root (the buccal shield) is intentionally retained to support the facial bone and gum tissues after tooth extraction. While SST is known to enhance esthetics and preserve bone in the short term, little evidence exists on its long-term effectiveness in different clinical scenarios.
This randomized clinical trial enrolled patients who needed single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups:
Immediate SST group: the implant was placed at the same time the socket shield was prepared.
Delayed SST group: implant placement was performed six months after socket shield preparation.
Over a 6-year follow-up period, both groups were evaluated for:
Changes in ridge width and bone height using CBCT imaging. Esthetic outcomes using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES). Patient satisfaction through a structured questionnaire.
The goal is to determine whether SST offers reliable long-term outcomes in either immediate or delayed implant placement scenarios, supporting its broader clinical use.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Immediate Implant Placement Using the Socket Shield Technique in Maxillary Esthetic Zone
NCT07082634
Socket Shield Technique Versus Conventional Immediate Implant Placement in Thin Buccofacial Bone
NCT03264053
Socket Shield With Immediate Implant Stability
NCT04882761
Socket Shield vs Conventional Immediate Implant
NCT03587597
Socket-Shield Technique With Immediate Implant
NCT05673122
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study Design:
Parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial Conducted at the Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University Sample: 25 patients needing single-tooth replacement
Groups:
Immediate SST: implant placed at time of shield preparation Delayed SST: implant placed after 6-month healing
Primary Outcome:
Ridge Width Change: measured at 1 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm apical to the implant platform using standardized CBCT imaging at baseline, 1 year, and 6 years.
Secondary Outcomes:
Buccal/Palatal Bone Height Implant Stability Pink Esthetic Score Patient Satisfaction
Serial CBCT scans were superimposed using the Fusion module of OnDemand3D software for precise assessment. All clinical assessments were performed by calibrated, blinded examiners. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, with significance set at p \< 0.05.
This study provides one of the first long-term comparative evaluations of SST in different implant placement protocols, offering evidence to support its clinical reliability over a 6-year period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Immediate Implant Placement with SST
Participants received the SST with immediate implant placement performed at the time of extraction.
Immediate Implant Placement with SST
Participants underwent extraction and socket shield preparation, followed by immediate implant placement in the esthetic maxillary zone. The implant was inserted at the same surgical session using a flapless or minimally invasive approach. CBCT was used to guide planning and assess ridge dimensions. Healing and follow-up assessments were conducted at 1 year and 6 years post-placement.
Delayed Implant Placement with SST
Participants received the SST with delayed implant placement, performed 6 months after extraction and shield preparation.
Delayed Implant Placement with SST
Participants underwent extraction and socket shield preparation. Implant placement was delayed for 6 months to allow soft and hard tissue healing. The implant was placed after verifying shield stability and ridge preservation via CBCT. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 1 year and 6 years post-placement.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Immediate Implant Placement with SST
Participants underwent extraction and socket shield preparation, followed by immediate implant placement in the esthetic maxillary zone. The implant was inserted at the same surgical session using a flapless or minimally invasive approach. CBCT was used to guide planning and assess ridge dimensions. Healing and follow-up assessments were conducted at 1 year and 6 years post-placement.
Delayed Implant Placement with SST
Participants underwent extraction and socket shield preparation. Implant placement was delayed for 6 months to allow soft and hard tissue healing. The implant was placed after verifying shield stability and ridge preservation via CBCT. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 1 year and 6 years post-placement.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 18-65 years
* Good systemic health
* Demonstrated good oral hygiene
* Presence of an intact buccal plate
* Class I or II sagittal root position
* Sufficient apical bone volume and quality for implant placement
* Willingness and ability to comply with study protocol and follow-up schedule
* Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Vertical root fracture or advanced periodontitis with buccal plate loss
* Uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g., diabetes, osteoporosis)
* Parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism, clenching)
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Soaad Tolba Mohammed Tolba Badawi
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Soaad Tolba Mohammed Tolba Badawi
Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Soaad Tolba Badawy, Lecturer, Oral Surgery, MU
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty of dentistry, Mansoura university
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R.25.09.21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.