Aquatic Exercises Combined With Cognitive Tasks for Older Adults

NCT ID: NCT07156708

Last Updated: 2025-09-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

98 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-05

Study Completion Date

2027-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aquatic environment has characteristics that favor the adherence of older adults to exercise programs, and studies have shown that programs in this setting are effective in enhancing various aspects of physical fitness as well as cognitive function in this population. Research has explored whether incorporating cognitive tasks into an aquatic exercise program could offer additional benefits, but it remains uncertain whether this approach leads to greater improvements in cognitive function compared to aquatic exercises alone. The present protocol reports the WaterCog Study, which aims to evaluate the effects of an aquatic aerobic exercise program combined with cognitive tasks, compared to a conventional aquatic aerobic exercise program and a control group, on cognitive function and other health-related outcomes in older adults. This trial is a randomized, single-blinded, three-arm, parallel, superiority trial. A total of 98 older adults are randomized into one of three groups: 1) an aquatic aerobic exercise program combined with cognitive tasks, 2) a conventional aquatic aerobic exercise program, and 3) a control group. Participants in both exercise groups complete a 12-week exercise program with two weekly sessions on non-consecutive days. The primary outcome is cognitive function, while secondary outcomes include physical function, cardiovascular, and psychosocial parameters. Outcomes are measured at baseline, post-intervention, and at the 12-week follow-up after the end of the intervention period. The analysis plan will employ an intention-to-treat approach and per-protocol criteria. The conceptual hypothesis of the study is that both training programs will significantly improve the investigated outcomes compared to the control group. Additionally, it is expected that aquatic exercises with cognitive tasks will promote additional benefits in cognitive function, with similar gains in physical function, cardiovascular, and psychosocial parameters compared to conventional aquatic aerobic exercises in post-intervention and follow-up measures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aging

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This trial is a randomized clinical trial employing a 1:1:1 allocation ratio. It was designed as a superiority trial with three parallel groups and blinded to outcome assessors and data analysis.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Blinding is applied to outcome assessors and data analysts responsible for evaluating both primary and secondary outcomes. However, due to the nature of the interventions, blinding is not feasible for the staff conducting the exercise sessions or the participants. To maintain assessor blinding, participants are instructed not to disclose their group allocation or discuss intervention details during outcome assessments.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Aquatic aerobic exercise program combined with cognitive tasks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Aquatic aerobic exercise program

Intervention Type OTHER

The aquatic exercise sessions include the following exercises: butt kick, frontal kick, cross-country skiing, and stationary running. These exercises are commonly used in water aerobics classes and provide controlled osteoarticular impact, being safe for older women (Alberton et al., 2019). Training intensity is prescribed using Borg's 6-20 rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale. The adopted strategy is based on interval training, which alternates between high-intensity effort and low-intensity active recovery phases. Each block consists of 4 minutes of effort (RPE 13 - 15), with one minute for each exercise (butt kick, frontal kick, cross-country skiing, and stationary running) followed by 1 minute of active recovery (RPE 11), performed with stationary running. To facilitate monitoring, an RPE scale (measuring 0.90 × 1.20 m) is fixed to the outside of the pool, in front of the participants.

Cognitive tasks

Intervention Type OTHER

This group performs the same aerobic training protocol used by the conventional aquatic program group. Additionally, cognitive tasks are performed during the active recovery phases. Cognitive training encompasses different domains of cognition in all sessions, including semantic fluency, processing speed, cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control, memory, attention, and reasoning. The exercises vary in each class, with progression in complexity in each mesocycle.

Conventional aquatic aerobic exercise program

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Aquatic aerobic exercise program

Intervention Type OTHER

The aquatic exercise sessions include the following exercises: butt kick, frontal kick, cross-country skiing, and stationary running. These exercises are commonly used in water aerobics classes and provide controlled osteoarticular impact, being safe for older women (Alberton et al., 2019). Training intensity is prescribed using Borg's 6-20 rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale. The adopted strategy is based on interval training, which alternates between high-intensity effort and low-intensity active recovery phases. Each block consists of 4 minutes of effort (RPE 13 - 15), with one minute for each exercise (butt kick, frontal kick, cross-country skiing, and stationary running) followed by 1 minute of active recovery (RPE 11), performed with stationary running. To facilitate monitoring, an RPE scale (measuring 0.90 × 1.20 m) is fixed to the outside of the pool, in front of the participants.

Control group

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Aquatic aerobic exercise program

The aquatic exercise sessions include the following exercises: butt kick, frontal kick, cross-country skiing, and stationary running. These exercises are commonly used in water aerobics classes and provide controlled osteoarticular impact, being safe for older women (Alberton et al., 2019). Training intensity is prescribed using Borg's 6-20 rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale. The adopted strategy is based on interval training, which alternates between high-intensity effort and low-intensity active recovery phases. Each block consists of 4 minutes of effort (RPE 13 - 15), with one minute for each exercise (butt kick, frontal kick, cross-country skiing, and stationary running) followed by 1 minute of active recovery (RPE 11), performed with stationary running. To facilitate monitoring, an RPE scale (measuring 0.90 × 1.20 m) is fixed to the outside of the pool, in front of the participants.

Intervention Type OTHER

Cognitive tasks

This group performs the same aerobic training protocol used by the conventional aquatic program group. Additionally, cognitive tasks are performed during the active recovery phases. Cognitive training encompasses different domains of cognition in all sessions, including semantic fluency, processing speed, cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control, memory, attention, and reasoning. The exercises vary in each class, with progression in complexity in each mesocycle.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Older women aged 60 and 75 years;
* Being physically inactive, meaning not participating in physical exercise for at least six months (regular exercise is defined as engaging in any physical training for a minimum of 20 minutes on two or more days a week).

Exclusion Criteria

* History of cardiovascular disease (except controlled hypertension);
* Osteoarticular limitations for the practice of exercises;
* Being illiterate due to the self-completion questionnaires and the characteristics of the intervention;
* Diagnosis of dementia, schizophrenia, or major depressive disorder.
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal University of Pelotas

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cristine Lima Alberton

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cristine L Alberton, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Federal University of Pelotas

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Escola Superior de Educação Física e Fisioterapia

Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mariana B Gomes

Role: CONTACT

5553999815166

Henrique S Ferreira

Role: CONTACT

5553991211115

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Cristine L Alberton, PhD

Role: primary

5551984062864

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Foster C, Florhaug JA, Franklin J, Gottschall L, Hrovatin LA, Parker S, Doleshal P, Dodge C. A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Feb;15(1):109-15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11708692 (View on PubMed)

Sao-Joao TM, Rodrigues RC, Gallani MC, Miura CT, Domingues Gde B, Godin G. [Cultural adaptation of the Brazilian version of the Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire]. Rev Saude Publica. 2013 Jun;47(3):479-87. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2013047003947. Portuguese.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24346560 (View on PubMed)

Brucki SM, Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Bertolucci PH, Okamoto IH. [Suggestions for utilization of the mini-mental state examination in Brazil]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2003 Sep;61(3B):777-81. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2003000500014. Epub 2003 Oct 28. Portuguese.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14595482 (View on PubMed)

Fleck MP, Louzada S, Xavier M, Chachamovich E, Vieira G, Santos L, Pinzon V. [Application of the Portuguese version of the abbreviated instrument of quality life WHOQOL-bref]. Rev Saude Publica. 2000 Apr;34(2):178-83. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102000000200012. Portuguese.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10881154 (View on PubMed)

Bertolazi AN, Fagondes SC, Hoff LS, Dartora EG, Miozzo IC, de Barba ME, Barreto SS. Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Sleep Med. 2011 Jan;12(1):70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2010.04.020. Epub 2010 Dec 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21145786 (View on PubMed)

Botega NJ, Bio MR, Zomignani MA, Garcia C Jr, Pereira WA. [Mood disorders among inpatients in ambulatory and validation of the anxiety and depression scale HAD]. Rev Saude Publica. 1995 Oct;29(5):355-63. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89101995000500004. Portuguese.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8731275 (View on PubMed)

Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996 Mar;17(3):354-81. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8737210 (View on PubMed)

STROOP, J. R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, v. 18, n. 6, p. 643-662, 1935.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

de Paula JJ, Costa DS, Miranda DM, Romano-Silva MA. Brazilian version of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ): cross-cultural adaptation and evidence of validity and reliability. Braz J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul-Sep;40(3):312-315. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2227. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29236920 (View on PubMed)

Carvalho GA, Caramelli P. Normative data for middle-aged Brazilians in Verbal Fluency (animals and FAS), Trail Making Test (TMT) and Clock Drawing Test (CDT). Dement Neuropsychol. 2020 Jan-Mar;14(1):14-23. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642020dn14-010003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32206193 (View on PubMed)

Ross TP, Calhoun E, Cox T, Wenner C, Kono W, Pleasant M. The reliability and validity of qualitative scores for the Controlled Oral Word Association Test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 May;22(4):475-88. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.01.026. Epub 2007 Feb 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17317094 (View on PubMed)

Schroeder RW, Twumasi-Ankrah P, Baade LE, Marshall PS. Reliable Digit Span: a systematic review and cross-validation study. Assessment. 2012 Mar;19(1):21-30. doi: 10.1177/1073191111428764. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22156721 (View on PubMed)

Alberton CL, Nunes GN, Rau DGDS, Bergamin M, Cavalli AS, Pinto SS. Vertical Ground Reaction Force During a Water-Based Exercise Performed by Elderly Women: Equipment Use Effects. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2019 Dec;90(4):479-486. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1620910. Epub 2019 Jun 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31184984 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

90526525.0.0000.5313

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.