Comparison of IPC Therapy as an Alternative or an Adjunct to MLD Within CDT for BCRL

NCT ID: NCT07154043

Last Updated: 2025-09-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-15

Study Completion Date

2026-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide and lymphedema is one of its most significant complications. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) may develop shortly after treatment or even years later, causing physical and psychological burden, functional impairment, and reduced quality of life. Complete decongestive therapy (CDT), which includes manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression, skin care, and exercise, is the standard approach. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) has been proposed as an additional option, and current consensus reports emphasize the need for studies evaluating IPC in combination with MLD.

Previous studies comparing IPC and MLD, either alone or in combination, have shown inconsistent results. Some reported no significant difference between treatment groups, while others suggested additional benefits of IPC, particularly in reducing limb heaviness and tension. However, there is still insufficient evidence to clarify the exact role of IPC within CDT.

The aim of this study is to investigate the acute effects of using IPC instead of MLD, or in combination with MLD, on arm circumference, arm volume, shoulder range of motion, and quality of life in patients with BCRL.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide and remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is one of the most important complications of breast cancer treatment. It may occur due to lymphatic system damage caused by surgery and/or radiotherapy, or as a result of tumor-related lymphangiogenesis, leading to interstitial fluid accumulation. BCRL can develop immediately after treatment or months to years later.

BCRL is associated with swelling, heaviness, discomfort, weakness, increased risk of infection, and progressive chronicity, which together result in upper extremity dysfunction and reduced quality of life. Compared with women without lymphedema, patients with BCRL report more frequent pain, decreased shoulder mobility, reduced upper extremity strength, impaired daily activities, and sensory disturbances.

The standard treatment for BCRL is complete decongestive therapy (CDT), which consists of manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression, skin care, and exercise. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) has also been proposed as a treatment option, and the 2023 consensus report of the International Society of Lymphology emphasized the need for further studies evaluating IPC in combination with MLD.

However, the number of studies directly comparing IPC with MLD, or evaluating their combined use, is limited and results remain inconsistent. Some trials reported no significant difference between MLD and IPC in terms of limb volume reduction, while others demonstrated additional benefits of IPC in relieving heaviness and tension. The role of IPC in CDT, whether as a replacement for MLD or as an adjunct, is not yet clearly defined.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the acute effects of using IPC instead of MLD, or in combination with MLD, within CDT on arm circumference, arm volume, shoulder range of motion, and quality of life in patients with BCRL.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema BCRL

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Complete Decongestive Therapy plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Group

Complete decongestive therapy program consisting of manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. In addition, patients will receive intermittent pneumatic compression with a device at 20-50 mmHg pressure for 40 minutes per session. The total treatment duration will be 115 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CDT + Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Complete decongestive therapy program including manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise, plus intermittent pneumatic compression at 20-50 mmHg for 40 minutes per session. Total duration: 115 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.

Complete Decongestive Therapy without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression

This group will receive a complete decongestive therapy program consisting of multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. Manual lymph drainage will be replaced by intermittent pneumatic compression. Intermittent pneumatic compression will be applied with a device at 20-50 mmHg pressure for 40 minutes per session. The total treatment duration will be 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CDT without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Complete decongestive therapy consisting of multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise, with manual lymph drainage replaced by intermittent pneumatic compression at 20-50 mmHg for 40 minutes per session. Total duration: 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.

Complete Decongestive Therapy Group

This group will receive a complete decongestive therapy program consisting of manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. The treatment duration will be 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT)

Manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

CDT + Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC)

Complete decongestive therapy program including manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise, plus intermittent pneumatic compression at 20-50 mmHg for 40 minutes per session. Total duration: 115 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

CDT without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression

Complete decongestive therapy consisting of multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise, with manual lymph drainage replaced by intermittent pneumatic compression at 20-50 mmHg for 40 minutes per session. Total duration: 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female gender
* Patients aged 18-65 years
* Having a history of unilateral mastectomy and lymph node dissection at least one year ago due to breast cancer diagnosis.
* Having unilateral breast cancer-related upper extremity lymphedema (\>20% volume difference between the two upper extremities or \>2 cm difference in circumference at any measured point) according to the diagnostic criteria of the International Society of Lymphology (Committee 2023) for at least six months.
* Not having received lymphedema treatment or exercise therapy for the last six months
* Completing breast cancer primary treatment at least 6 months ago (except hormone therapy/aromatase inhibitors)

Exclusion Criteria

* Bilateral breast cancer
* Bilateral axillary lymph node dissection
* Metastatic breast cancer
* Receiving ongoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy
* Primary or bilateral lymphedema
* Having active cancer
* Presence of stage 3 lymphedema
* Uncontrolled serious systemic disease (cardiopulmonary diseases, arterial or venous diseases, renal dysfunction, uncontrolled hypertension or hypotension, cardiac arrhythmia, scleroderma, Sudek's atrophy).
* Current or recent (within the last 3 months) infection (cellulitis, lymphangitis) or deep venous thrombosis
* Presence of open wounds
* Using medications that may affect body fluid and electrolyte balance (diuretics, etc.).
* Individuals with serious mental and sensory problems
* Being pregnant
* Body mass index \>40 kg/m2
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pamukkale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Oya Topuz

Professor Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Oya Topuz, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Pamukkale University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pamukkale University

Denizli, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Emre Bezmez, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

+905319902220

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 May 18;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-44.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16709254 (View on PubMed)

LeBlanc M, Stineman M, DeMichele A, Stricker C, Mao JJ. Validation of QuickDASH outcome measure in breast cancer survivors for upper extremity disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24095658 (View on PubMed)

Koldas Dogan S, Ay S, Evcik D, Baser O. Adaptation of Turkish version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Feb;30(2):185-91. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1470-y. Epub 2010 Apr 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20411289 (View on PubMed)

Sitzia J. Volume measurement in lymphoedema treatment: examination of formulae. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1995 Mar;4(1):11-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.1995.tb00047.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7620649 (View on PubMed)

Karges JR, Mark BE, Stikeleather SJ, Worrell TW. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume. Phys Ther. 2003 Feb;83(2):134-45.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12564949 (View on PubMed)

Executive Committee of the International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2020 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology. 2020;53(1):3-19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32521126 (View on PubMed)

De Vrieze T, Gebruers N, Tjalma WA, Nevelsteen I, Thomis S, De Groef A, Dams L, Van der Gucht E, Belgrado JP, Vandermeeren L, Devoogdt N. What is the best method to determine excessive arm volume in patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema in clinical practice? Reliability, time efficiency and clinical feasibility of five different methods. Clin Rehabil. 2019 Jul;33(7):1221-1232. doi: 10.1177/0269215519835907. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30880473 (View on PubMed)

Keeley V, Riches K, Ward L, Franks PJ. A Prospective Preliminary Study Examining the Physiological Impact of Pneumatic Compression Dosing in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol. 2023 Oct;21(5):456-462. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2022.0087. Epub 2023 May 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37140559 (View on PubMed)

Kayali Vatansever A, Yavuzsen T, Karadibak D. The Reliability and Validity of Quality of Life Questionnaire Upper Limb Lymphedema (ULL-27) Turkish Patient With Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema. Front Oncol. 2020 May 12;10:455. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00455. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32477925 (View on PubMed)

Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98-101. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12861145 (View on PubMed)

Stanton AW, Badger C, Sitzia J. Non-invasive assessment of the lymphedematous limb. Lymphology. 2000 Sep;33(3):122-35.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11019400 (View on PubMed)

Szuba A, Achalu R, Rockson SG. Decongestive lymphatic therapy for patients with breast carcinoma-associated lymphedema. A randomized, prospective study of a role for adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression. Cancer. 2002 Dec 1;95(11):2260-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10976.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12436430 (View on PubMed)

Szolnoky G, Lakatos B, Keskeny T, Varga E, Varga M, Dobozy A, Kemeny L. Intermittent pneumatic compression acts synergistically with manual lymphatic drainage in complex decongestive physiotherapy for breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema. Lymphology. 2009 Dec;42(4):188-94.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20218087 (View on PubMed)

Tastaban E, Soyder A, Aydin E, Sendur OF, Turan Y, Ture M, Bilgen M. Role of intermittent pneumatic compression in the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Feb;34(2):220-228. doi: 10.1177/0269215519888792. Epub 2019 Dec 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31795748 (View on PubMed)

Uzkeser H, Karatay S, Erdemci B, Koc M, Senel K. Efficacy of manual lymphatic drainage and intermittent pneumatic compression pump use in the treatment of lymphedema after mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer. 2015 May;22(3):300-7. doi: 10.1007/s12282-013-0481-3. Epub 2013 Aug 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23925581 (View on PubMed)

Sanal-Toprak C, Ozsoy-Unubol T, Bahar-Ozdemir Y, Akyuz G. The efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression as a substitute for manual lymphatic drainage in complete decongestive therapy in the treatment of breast cancer related lymphedema. Lymphology. 2019;52(2):82-91.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31525829 (View on PubMed)

Ridner SH, Fu MR, Wanchai A, Stewart BR, Armer JM, Cormier JN. Self-management of lymphedema: a systematic review of the literature from 2004 to 2011. Nurs Res. 2012 Jul-Aug;61(4):291-9. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31824f82b2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22565103 (View on PubMed)

Executive Committee of the International Society of Lymphology. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Lymphedema: 2023 Consensus Document of The International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology. 2023;56(4):133-151.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39207406 (View on PubMed)

Gursen C, Dylke ES, Moloney N, Meeus M, De Vrieze T, Devoogdt N, De Groef A. Self-reported signs and symptoms of secondary upper limb lymphoedema related to breast cancer treatment: Systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Sep;30(5):e13440. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13440. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33733550 (View on PubMed)

Orhan C, Uzelpasaci E, Baran E, Nakip G, Ozgul S, Aksoy S, Akbayrak T. The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Lymphedema Life Impact Scale in Patients With Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema. Cancer Nurs. 2020 Sep/Oct;43(5):375-383. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000709.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30921030 (View on PubMed)

Smoot B, Wong J, Cooper B, Wanek L, Topp K, Byl N, Dodd M. Upper extremity impairments in women with or without lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. J Cancer Surviv. 2010 Jun;4(2):167-78. doi: 10.1007/s11764-010-0118-x. Epub 2010 Apr 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20373044 (View on PubMed)

Lee TS, Morris CM, Czerniec SA, Mangion AJ. Does Lymphedema Severity Affect Quality of Life? Simple Question. Challenging Answers. Lymphat Res Biol. 2018 Feb;16(1):85-91. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2016.0049. Epub 2017 Apr 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28453410 (View on PubMed)

Pinto M, Gimigliano F, Tatangelo F, Megna M, Izzo F, Gimigliano R, Iolascon G. Upper limb function and quality of life in breast cancer related lymphedema: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013 Oct;49(5):665-73. Epub 2013 May 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23698473 (View on PubMed)

Park JE, Jang HJ, Seo KS. Quality of life, upper extremity function and the effect of lymphedema treatment in breast cancer related lymphedema patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2012 Apr;36(2):240-7. doi: 10.5535/arm.2012.36.2.240. Epub 2012 Apr 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22639749 (View on PubMed)

Dawes DJ, Meterissian S, Goldberg M, Mayo NE. Impact of lymphoedema on arm function and health-related quality of life in women following breast cancer surgery. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Aug;40(8):651-8. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0232.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19020699 (View on PubMed)

DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):500-15. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70076-7. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23540561 (View on PubMed)

Pappalardo M, Starnoni M, Franceschini G, Baccarani A, De Santis G. Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Recent Updates on Diagnosis, Severity and Available Treatments. J Pers Med. 2021 May 12;11(5):402. doi: 10.3390/jpm11050402.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34065795 (View on PubMed)

McDuff SGR, Mina AI, Brunelle CL, Salama L, Warren LEG, Abouegylah M, Swaroop M, Skolny MN, Asdourian M, Gillespie T, Daniell K, Sayegh HE, Naoum GE, Zheng H, Taghian AG. Timing of Lymphedema After Treatment for Breast Cancer: When Are Patients Most At Risk? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jan 1;103(1):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.08.036. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30165125 (View on PubMed)

Mortimer P. Arm lymphoedema after breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):442-3. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70097-4. Epub 2013 Mar 27. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23540560 (View on PubMed)

Burckhardt M, Belzner M, Berg A, Fleischer S. Living with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a synthesis of qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Jul 1;41(4):E220-37. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.E220-E237.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24969257 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PamukkaleU.ftr-OTopuz-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.