Complete Decongestive Therapy in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

NCT ID: NCT02458391

Last Updated: 2018-10-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-31

Study Completion Date

2015-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to investigate which number of lymphedema therapy treatments/week best reduces upper extremity swelling, increased arm function, and reduces the most lymphedema symptoms.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT) is the "gold standard" in lymphedema care and has been found to be efficacious in numerous studies. These studies have varying treatment protocols of intensive phase I CDT with dosing ranging from 2x/wk for a mean of 7.5 wks to 6x/wk until a plateau in arm volumes were achieved. This variability in research does not lend itself to recommendations of evidence-based protocol use of CDT in an outpatient setting.

Although CDT is backed by efficacy studies, the daily dosing given to patients is based on anecdotal rather than evidence-based practice. Because the traditional protocol was developed from "longstanding experience," research is necessary to determine the best dosing of the intensive phase of CDT. The purpose of this study is to investigate what level of dosing in the intensive CDT phase promotes best volume reduction and increased upper extremity function in the breast cancer-related lymphedema patient population. This particular study will answer: What dosing produces best volumetric reduction and upper extremity function in the intensive phase of complete decongestive therapy for outpatients with breast cancer-related lymphedema 2x/wk for 4wks or 4x/wk for 4 wks?

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymphedema of Upper Limb

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment 2x/wk

Participants will receive standard of care complete decongestive therapy 2x/wk for 4 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Standard of care complete decongestive therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will receive standard of care complete decongestive therapy consisting of meticulous skin and nail care, manual lymphatic drainage, compression bandaging, remedial exercises and self-care training.

Treatment 4x/wk

Participants will receive standard of care complete decongestive therapy 4x/wk for 4 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Standard of care complete decongestive therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will receive standard of care complete decongestive therapy consisting of meticulous skin and nail care, manual lymphatic drainage, compression bandaging, remedial exercises and self-care training.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard of care complete decongestive therapy

Participants will receive standard of care complete decongestive therapy consisting of meticulous skin and nail care, manual lymphatic drainage, compression bandaging, remedial exercises and self-care training.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Have active unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema
2. Medically stable
3. Have not participated in lymphedema therapy the past 3 months
4. An affected limb volume measurement of \>10% excess volume
5. Ages 18-95 years old

* Patients undergoing any medical treatment for their breast cancer diagnosis will be included in this study.
* Patients with any stage breast cancer will be included in this study.
* Patients with a prior diagnosis of breast cancer, other cancer will be included in this study. There is no minimum time requirement that has prolapsed between their diagnosis and this study.

All subjects must have given signed, informed consent prior to registration on study.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Prophylactic treatment indicated
2. A presence of upper extremity wounds present
3. Active signs of infection or deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
4. Bilateral lymphedema present
5. Evidence of contraindications to CDT: uncontrolled hypertension, heart disease including congestive heart failure, and renal insufficiency
6. Severe lymphedema present as defined by \> 30% increase in limb volume
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

95 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novacare

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Midwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Indianapolis

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Katie M. Polo, MHS, OTR/L, CLT-LANA

Sponsor Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Rundquist, PhD, PT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Indianapolis

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fu, M.R., Hu, S. Cleland, C.M. Kang, Y. (June, 29, 2012). Measuring lymphedema symptom burdens: A psychometric study. The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer's annual meeting (MASCC/ISOO): 2012 International Symposium on Supportive Care in Cancer in New York City on June 28-30, 2012.

Reference Type RESULT

Mayrovitz HN, Macdonald J, Davey S, Olson K, Washington E. Measurement decisions for clinical assessment of limb volume changes in patients with bilateral and unilateral limb edema. Phys Ther. 2007 Oct;87(10):1362-8. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060382. Epub 2007 Aug 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17684090 (View on PubMed)

Taylor R, Jayasinghe UW, Koelmeyer L, Ung O, Boyages J. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema. Phys Ther. 2006 Feb;86(2):205-14.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16445334 (View on PubMed)

Devoogdt N, Van Kampen M, Geraerts I, Coremans T, Christiaens MR. Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health questionnaire (Lymph-ICF): reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 2011 Jun;91(6):944-57. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100087. Epub 2011 Apr 14.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21493748 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UIndianapolis

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Subclinical Lymphedema Treatment Study
NCT03292198 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA