A Language-Based Training Intervention to Enhance Cognitive Health in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

NCT ID: NCT07132281

Last Updated: 2026-01-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-02

Study Completion Date

2028-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Taiwan is fast approaching a super-aged society, making it urgent to bolster cognitive health in otherwise healthy older adults. This integrated project tackles that need with a language-centered intervention grounded in predictive-coding and active-inference theory. Over 12 weeks, community-dwelling adults aged 65 + join small-group reading-and-writing workshops that train them to actively predict, monitor, and revise linguistic information. Ninety volunteers are randomly allocated to an active language-prediction group, a passive reading group, or a hobby board-game control. Before and after the course, researchers collect behavioural tests, EEG, fMRI, and AI-based speech-language analytics to quantify gains and transfer effects across cognition, emotion, and daily function.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Taiwan will enter a super-aged society in 2025, with adults aged 65 and above expected to comprise 20 % of the population-a shift that makes preserving cognitive health an urgent public-health priority. To meet this challenge, our integrated project draws on predictive-coding and active-inference theory to couple language science with neuroscience, psychology, occupational therapy, and large-language-model analytics. Within this framework, the present sub-project tests a 12-week, small-group language-training curriculum that meets once a week for two hours. Sessions weave together reading aloud, listening, oral summarising, writing, and guided discussion, all structured to elicit continual prediction, self-monitoring, feedback, and creative revision during language use.

Approximately ninety community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older are being recruited and randomly assigned, in equal blocks of thirty, to one of three arms: an active language-prediction group that emphasises hypothesis-testing during language production and comprehension; a passive reading group that provides leisure reading and sharing without explicit predictive feedback; and a board-game control group that engages cognition but not language prediction.

Before and after the intervention, each participant completes a comprehensive battery. Behaviourally, the investigators assess verbal fluency, language memory, and real-time sentence-prediction accuracy, while electrophysiology (N400, anterior-positivity ERPs, anterior P2, and P300) and functional MRI capture neural plasticity associated with sentence processing, visual reasoning, and cognitive flexibility. Executive functions, divergent and convergent thinking, attention, affect, social cognition, and instrumental activities of daily living provide secondary endpoints to gauge transfer beyond language. Throughout the 12 weeks, spoken narratives are recorded and analyzed for idea density and syntactic complexity with large-language-model tools, yielding fine-grained markers of change unavailable to traditional testing.

The investigators anticipate that targeted, prediction-based training will rejuvenate age-diminished language-prediction signals, drive adaptive reorganization of executive and language networks, and produce broader cognitive and functional gains than either passive reading or non-linguistic gaming. Embedded in community settings, this program also seeks to foster lasting reading habits, strengthen collective cognitive resilience, and offer an ecologically valid blueprint for scaling evidence-based cognitive-health interventions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Promoting Active Inference of Healthy Older Adults With Language Activity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active inference training

Participants will undergo language activities and will be encouraged to actively infer based on the given language materials.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Language activities active inference

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will join reading or writing activities and come up with their own inference about wording or plots.

Step-by-Step Guidance

Participants will undergo language activities and will receive step-by-step guidance.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Language activities passive

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will join reading or writing activities and will be given step-by-step explanations about the wording and plots.

Board Games

Participants will play boards games under a schedule matching the Experimental and Active Comparator arms.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Board Games

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will play board games with each other.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Language activities active inference

Participants will join reading or writing activities and come up with their own inference about wording or plots.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Language activities passive

Participants will join reading or writing activities and will be given step-by-step explanations about the wording and plots.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Board Games

Participants will play board games with each other.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged between 20 and 30 (healthy young adults) or aged 65 and above (healthy older adults).
* Native Mandarin Chinese speakers who had no exposure to non-indigenous languages before the age of five.
* Have completed at least a junior high school level of education.
* Right-handed.
* Have normal or corrected-to-normal vision (e.g., through glasses or contact lenses).
* Able to fully participate in the entire assessment and intervention schedule (with no more than two missed intervention sessions).
* Achieve a score of 23 or higher on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

Exclusion Criteria

* Participation in another cognitive intervention program within the past two months.
* Cognitive intervention is not feasible due to dyslexia or physical illness. Meet the diagnostic criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or dementia.
* Presence of severe depression, or cognitive changes caused by other psychiatric, neurological disorders, or substance abuse, with symptoms that are unstable or interfere with functioning.
* History of brain injury or neurological conditions (e.g., stroke, aneurysm).
* Contraindications for MRI scanning, such as metal implants, pacemakers, or pregnancy.
* Claustrophobia (an anxiety disorder characterized by panic symptoms or fear of panic attacks in enclosed spaces such as elevators, vehicles, tunnels, or airplane cabins).
* Unable to undergo cognitive assessments due to visual or hearing impairments.
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Chia-Lin Lee, Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

886-921-364-008

Chia-Lin Lee, Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

886-2-3366-1972

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Chia-Lin Lee, Ph.D.

Role: primary

886-921-364-008

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202504009RIND

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

a Modified NTU-HELP Program
NCT01045330 COMPLETED NA