ACTIVE: Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly
NCT ID: NCT00298558
Last Updated: 2014-04-16
Study Results
Results available
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
PHASE2/PHASE3
Total Enrollment
2832 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
1998-03-31
Study Completion Date
2010-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of the ACTIVE study was to test if cognitive training interventions could maintain functional independence in elders by improving basic mental abilities, with follow-up assessments through five years.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cognitively Enriched Walking Program
NCT05500183
Healthy Aging
Cognitive Decline
Physical Inactivity
UNKNOWN
NA
Effect of an Advance Care Planning Intervention
NCT04852055
Dementia
COMPLETED
NA
Enhanced Medical Rehabilitation in Older Adults
NCT02114879
Disabling Medical Events
Disabled
Depression
COMPLETED
NA
Enhancing Cognitive Control Abilities Using Mobile Technology in a Senior Living Community
NCT04905849
Aging
Cognitive Change
TERMINATED
NA
Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment
NCT04065854
Dementia
Mild Cognitive Impairment
UNKNOWN
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
ACTIVE was a 4-arm, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. The primary objective of ACTIVE was to test the effectiveness and durability of three distinct cognitive interventions in improving elders' performance on basic measures of cognition and measures of cognitively demanding daily activities (e.g., food preparation, driving, medication use, financial management). These interventions previously had been found successful in improving cognitive abilities under laboratory or small-scale field conditions.
The three interventions shared common design features: 1) equivalent intensity and duration; 2) small group settings in ten 60-75 minute sessions; 3) focus on strategies for solving problems, remembering, or responding quickly to information; 4) modeling and demonstration of strategy usage; 5) practice on exemplar problems; 6) individual and group exercises; 7) feedback on performance; 8) fostering of self-efficacy regarding performance; 9) applying strategies to real-world tasks; 10) individualized training experiences, and 11) social interaction activities. In all three interventions, Sessions 1-5 focused on strategy instruction and exercises to practice the strategy. Sessions 6-10 provided additional practice exercises, but no new strategies were introduced. Content for each of the 10 sessions was scripted in a trainer's manual.
Interventions:
1. Reasoning training focused on inductive reasoning, the ability to solve problems that follow a serial pattern and manifest in executive functioning. Participants were taught strategies to identify the pattern or sequence required to solve a problem. Training exercises involved identifying patterns in both laboratory-type reasoning tasks and in everyday activities, e.g., understanding the pattern in a bus schedule.
2. Memory training focused on verbal episodic memory, which deals with acquisition and retrieval of information acquired in a particular place at a particular time. Participants were taught mnemonic strategies for remembering lists and sequences of items, text material, and main ideas and details of stories and other text-based information. Training exercises involved recalling laboratory-like episodic memory tasks as well as tasks related to everyday activities such as recalling a shopping list.
3. Speed training focused on visual search and the ability to identify and locate visual information quickly in a divided attention format, with and without distractors. Participants practiced speeded tasks on a computer, and were allowed to proceed to more complex tasks, and faster and faster presentation speeds at their own pace.
4. A control group received no training.
In addition, booster training was provided to help participants maintain gains made from initial training and to further improve cognitive skills. Booster training was provided to a random sample of approximately 50% of training participants at 11 and 35-36 months after primary training.
Participant involvement included assessments conducted at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 12, 24, 36 and 60 months. Assessments were conducted in individual and group sessions. For participants randomized to intervention groups, the interventions were conducted in small group settings in ten 60-75 minute sessions over a 5-6 week period. These were behavioral interventions with no pharmacologic component. Eleven months after the initial training was provided, booster training was offered, in all three intervention arms, to a randomly selected 60% of initially trained subjects. Booster training was delivered in four 75-minute sessions over a 2-3 week period.
The primary study hypotheses were:
* Each training group will perform better than the other training and control groups on their respective primary and proximal outcomes
* Those groups that received booster training will perform better than those that did not receive booster training on their respective primary and proximal outcomes.
The three interventions shared common design features: 1) equivalent intensity and duration; 2) small group settings in ten 60-75 minute sessions; 3) focus on strategies for solving problems, remembering, or responding quickly to information; 4) modeling and demonstration of strategy usage; 5) practice on exemplar problems; 6) individual and group exercises; 7) feedback on performance; 8) fostering of self-efficacy regarding performance; 9) applying strategies to real-world tasks; 10) individualized training experiences, and 11) social interaction activities. In all three interventions, Sessions 1-5 focused on strategy instruction and exercises to practice the strategy. Sessions 6-10 provided additional practice exercises, but no new strategies were introduced. Content for each of the 10 sessions was scripted in a trainer's manual.
Interventions:
1. Reasoning training focused on inductive reasoning, the ability to solve problems that follow a serial pattern and manifest in executive functioning. Participants were taught strategies to identify the pattern or sequence required to solve a problem. Training exercises involved identifying patterns in both laboratory-type reasoning tasks and in everyday activities, e.g., understanding the pattern in a bus schedule.
2. Memory training focused on verbal episodic memory, which deals with acquisition and retrieval of information acquired in a particular place at a particular time. Participants were taught mnemonic strategies for remembering lists and sequences of items, text material, and main ideas and details of stories and other text-based information. Training exercises involved recalling laboratory-like episodic memory tasks as well as tasks related to everyday activities such as recalling a shopping list.
3. Speed training focused on visual search and the ability to identify and locate visual information quickly in a divided attention format, with and without distractors. Participants practiced speeded tasks on a computer, and were allowed to proceed to more complex tasks, and faster and faster presentation speeds at their own pace.
4. A control group received no training.
In addition, booster training was provided to help participants maintain gains made from initial training and to further improve cognitive skills. Booster training was provided to a random sample of approximately 50% of training participants at 11 and 35-36 months after primary training.
Participant involvement included assessments conducted at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 12, 24, 36 and 60 months. Assessments were conducted in individual and group sessions. For participants randomized to intervention groups, the interventions were conducted in small group settings in ten 60-75 minute sessions over a 5-6 week period. These were behavioral interventions with no pharmacologic component. Eleven months after the initial training was provided, booster training was offered, in all three intervention arms, to a randomly selected 60% of initially trained subjects. Booster training was delivered in four 75-minute sessions over a 2-3 week period.
The primary study hypotheses were:
* Each training group will perform better than the other training and control groups on their respective primary and proximal outcomes
* Those groups that received booster training will perform better than those that did not receive booster training on their respective primary and proximal outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Aging
Healthy
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Primary Study Purpose
PREVENTION
Blinding Strategy
SINGLE
Participants
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Memory Training
Memory training focused on verbal episodic memory. Participants were taught mnemonic strategies for remembering lists and sequences of items, text material, and main ideas and details of stories and other text-based information.
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Cognitive Training
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Memory, Reasoning, or Speed of Processing cognitive training interventions
Reasoning Training
Reasoning training focused on the ability to solve problems that follow a serial pattern. Participants were taught strategies to identify the pattern or sequence required to solve a problem.
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Cognitive Training
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Memory, Reasoning, or Speed of Processing cognitive training interventions
Speed of Processing Training
Speed of processing training focused on visual search and the ability to identify and locate visual information quickly in a divided attention format. Participants practiced increasingly complex speeded tasks on a computer.
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Cognitive Training
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Memory, Reasoning, or Speed of Processing cognitive training interventions
Control
This group did not complete any cognitive training interventions
Group Type
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR
Cognitive Training
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Memory, Reasoning, or Speed of Processing cognitive training interventions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cognitive Training
Memory, Reasoning, or Speed of Processing cognitive training interventions
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 65 or older
* Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 23 or greater
* Vision scored greater than 20/50
* Minimal dependence in hygiene, bathing, and dressing
* Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease
* Stroke in previous 12 months
* Cancer with limited life expectance
* Current chemotherapy or radiation treatment
* Communication problems
* Planned move from study area
* Scheduling conflicts that would preclude participation in study activities
* Prior involvement in similar cognitive training studies
* Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 23 or greater
* Vision scored greater than 20/50
* Minimal dependence in hygiene, bathing, and dressing
* Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease
* Stroke in previous 12 months
* Cancer with limited life expectance
* Current chemotherapy or radiation treatment
* Communication problems
* Planned move from study area
* Scheduling conflicts that would preclude participation in study activities
* Prior involvement in similar cognitive training studies
Exclusion Criteria
* Significant decline in cognitive skills, physical abilities, or functional independence
Minimum Eligible Age
65 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
NIH
Sponsor Role
collaborator
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
NIH
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Carelon Research
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karlene Ball, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Frederick Unverzagt, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indiana University
George Rebok, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University
John Morris, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hebrew Senior Life
Sharon L. Tennstedt, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Carelon Research
Michael Marsiske, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wayne State University
Sherry Willis, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Penn State University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Site Status
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Site Status
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Site Status
Johns Hopkins University
Cumberland, Maryland, United States
Site Status
Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for the Aged
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Site Status
Wayne State University
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Site Status
Pennsylvania State University
University Park, Pennsylvania, United States
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
United States
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jobe JB, Smith DM, Ball K, Tennstedt SL, Marsiske M, Willis SL, Rebok GW, Morris JN, Helmers KF, Leveck MD, Kleinman K. ACTIVE: a cognitive intervention trial to promote independence in older adults. Control Clin Trials. 2001 Aug;22(4):453-79. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(01)00139-8.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Jones RN, Rosenberg AL, Morris JN, Allaire JC, McCoy KJ, Marsiske M, Kleinman KP, Rebok GW, Malloy PF. A growth curve model of learning acquisition among cognitively normal older adults. Exp Aging Res. 2005 Jul-Sep;31(3):291-312. doi: 10.1080/03610730590948195.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kuo HK, Jones RN, Milberg WP, Tennstedt S, Talbot L, Morris JN, Lipsitz LA. Cognitive function in normal-weight, overweight, and obese older adults: an analysis of the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly cohort. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Jan;54(1):97-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00522.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Diehl M, Marsiske M, Horgas AL, Rosenberg A, Saczynski JS, Willis SL. The Revised Observed Tasks of Daily Living: A Performance-Based Assessment of Everyday Problem Solving in Older Adults. J Appl Gerontol. 2005;24(3):211-230. doi: 10.1177/0733464804273772.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wadley VG, Crowe M, Marsiske M, Cook SE, Unverzagt FW, Rosenberg AL, Rexroth D. Changes in everyday function in individuals with psychometrically defined mild cognitive impairment in the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Aug;55(8):1192-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01245.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cook SE, Marsiske M, Thomas KR, Unverzagt FW, Wadley VG, Langbaum JB, Crowe M. Identification of mild cognitive impairment in ACTIVE: algorithmic classification and stability. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2013 Jan;19(1):73-87. doi: 10.1017/S1355617712000938. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Owsley C, Sloane M, McGwin G Jr, Ball K. Timed instrumental activities of daily living tasks: relationship to cognitive function and everyday performance assessments in older adults. Gerontology. 2002 Jul-Aug;48(4):254-65. doi: 10.1159/000058360.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gallo JJ, Rebok GW, Tennsted S, Wadley VG, Horgas A; Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (Active) Study Investigators. Linking depressive symptoms and functional disability in late life. Aging Ment Health. 2003 Nov;7(6):469-80. doi: 10.1080/13607860310001594736.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Caskie GI, Willis SL. Congruence of self-reported medications with pharmacy prescription records in low-income older adults. Gerontologist. 2004 Apr;44(2):176-85. doi: 10.1093/geront/44.2.176.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Edwards JD, Ross LA, Wadley VG, Clay OJ, Crowe M, Roenker DL, Ball KK. The useful field of view test: normative data for older adults. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 May;21(4):275-86. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.03.001. Epub 2006 May 15.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wolinsky FD, Unverzagt FW, Smith DM, Jones R, Wright E, Tennstedt SL. The effects of the ACTIVE cognitive training trial on clinically relevant declines in health-related quality of life. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006 Sep;61(5):S281-7. doi: 10.1093/geronb/61.5.s281.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Crowe M, Andel R, Wadley V, Cook S, Unverzagt F, Marsiske M, Ball K. Subjective cognitive function and decline among older adults with psychometrically defined amnestic MCI. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;21(12):1187-92. doi: 10.1002/gps.1639.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kuo HK, Jones RN, Milberg WP, Tennstedt S, Talbot L, Morris JN, Lipsitz LA. Effect of blood pressure and diabetes mellitus on cognitive and physical functions in older adults: a longitudinal analysis of the advanced cognitive training for independent and vital elderly cohort. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Jul;53(7):1154-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53368.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wolinsky FD, Unverzagt FW, Smith DM, Jones R, Stoddard A, Tennstedt SL. The ACTIVE cognitive training trial and health-related quality of life: protection that lasts for 5 years. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006 Dec;61(12):1324-9. doi: 10.1093/gerona/61.12.1324.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ball K, Edwards JD, Ross LA. The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday functions. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Jun;62 Spec No 1:19-31. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.special_issue_1.19.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rebok GW, Carlson MC, Langbaum JB. Training and maintaining memory abilities in healthy older adults: traditional and novel approaches. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Jun;62 Spec No 1:53-61. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.special_issue_1.53.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Unverzagt FW, Kasten L, Johnson KE, Rebok GW, Marsiske M, Koepke KM, Elias JW, Morris JN, Willis SL, Ball K, Rexroth DF, Smith DM, Wolinsky FD, Tennstedt SL. Effect of memory impairment on training outcomes in ACTIVE. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007 Nov;13(6):953-60. doi: 10.1017/S1355617707071512.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Edwards JD, Ross LA, Ackerman ML, Small BJ, Ball KK, Bradley S, Dodson JE. Longitudinal predictors of driving cessation among older adults from the ACTIVE clinical trial. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008 Jan;63(1):P6-12. doi: 10.1093/geronb/63.1.p6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Morgan AA, Marsiske M, Whitfield KE. Characterizing and explaining differences in cognitive test performance between african american and European American older adults. Exp Aging Res. 2008 Jan-Mar;34(1):80-100. doi: 10.1080/03610730701776427.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Vance DE, Ross LA, Crowe MG, Wadley VG, Edwards JD, Ball KK. THE RELATIONSHIP OF MEMORY, REASONING, AND SPEED OF PROCESSING ON FALLING AMONG OLDER ADULTS. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2008;27(3):212-228. doi: 10.1080/02703180802377123.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ackerman ML, Edwards JD, Ross LA, Ball KK, Lunsman M. Examination of cognitive and instrumental functional performance as indicators for driving cessation risk across 3 years. Gerontologist. 2008 Dec;48(6):802-10. doi: 10.1093/geront/48.6.802.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Langbaum JB, Rebok GW, Bandeen-Roche K, Carlson MC. Predicting memory training response patterns: results from ACTIVE. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 Jan;64(1):14-23. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbn026. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Tucker-Drob EM, Johnson KE, Jones RN. The cognitive reserve hypothesis: a longitudinal examination of age-associated declines in reasoning and processing speed. Dev Psychol. 2009 Mar;45(2):431-46. doi: 10.1037/a0014012.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ross LA, Clay OJ, Edwards JD, Ball KK, Wadley VG, Vance DE, Cissell GM, Roenker DL, Joyce JJ. Do older drivers at-risk for crashes modify their driving over time? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 Mar;64(2):163-70. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbn034. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wolinsky FD, Vander Weg MW, Martin R, Unverzagt FW, Ball KK, Jones RN, Tennstedt SL. The effect of speed-of-processing training on depressive symptoms in ACTIVE. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009 Apr;64(4):468-72. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gln044. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wolinsky FD, Mahncke HW, Kosinski M, Unverzagt FW, Smith DM, Jones RN, Stoddard A, Tennstedt SL. The ACTIVE cognitive training trial and predicted medical expenditures. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun 29;9:109. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-109.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Unverzagt FW, Smith DM, Rebok GW, Marsiske M, Morris JN, Jones R, Willis SL, Ball K, King JW, Koepke KM, Stoddard A, Tennstedt SL. The Indiana Alzheimer Disease Center's Symposium on Mild Cognitive Impairment. Cognitive training in older adults: lessons from the ACTIVE Study. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2009 Aug;6(4):375-83. doi: 10.2174/156720509788929345.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wolinsky FD, Mahncke HW, Weg MW, Martin R, Unverzagt FW, Ball KK, Jones RN, Tennstedt SL. The ACTIVE cognitive training interventions and the onset of and recovery from suspected clinical depression. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 Sep;64(5):577-85. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp061. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Edwards JD, Lunsman M, Perkins M, Rebok GW, Roth DL. Driving cessation and health trajectories in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009 Dec;64(12):1290-5. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glp114. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Edwards JD, Delahunt PB, Mahncke HW. Cognitive speed of processing training delays driving cessation. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009 Dec;64(12):1262-7. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glp131. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kvale EA, Clay OJ, Ross-Meadows LA, McGee JS, Edwards JD, Unverzagt FW, Ritchie CS, Ball KK. Cognitive speed of processing and functional declines in older cancer survivors: an analysis of data from the ACTIVE trial. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010 Jan 1;19(1):110-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.01018.x. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wolinsky FD, Mahncke H, Vander Weg MW, Martin R, Unverzagt FW, Ball KK, Jones RN, Tennstedt SL. Speed of processing training protects self-rated health in older adults: enduring effects observed in the multi-site ACTIVE randomized controlled trial. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010 May;22(3):470-8. doi: 10.1017/S1041610209991281. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
O'Connor ML, Edwards JD, Wadley VG, Crowe M. Changes in mobility among older adults with psychometrically defined mild cognitive impairment. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 May;65B(3):306-16. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbq003. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Yen YC, Rebok GW, Gallo JJ, Jones RN, Tennstedt SL. Depressive symptoms impair everyday problem-solving ability through cognitive abilities in late life. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;19(2):142-50. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181e89894.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wolinsky FD, Vander Weg MW, Martin R, Unverzagt FW, Willis SL, Marsiske M, Rebok GW, Morris JN, Ball KK, Tennstedt SL. Does cognitive training improve internal locus of control among older adults? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 Sep;65(5):591-8. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp117. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Aiken Morgan AT, Marsiske M, Dzierzewski JM, Jones RN, Whitfield KE, Johnson KE, Cresci MK. Race-related cognitive test bias in the active study: a mimic model approach. Exp Aging Res. 2010 Oct;36(4):426-52. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2010.507427.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gross AL, Rebok GW, Unverzagt FW, Willis SL, Brandt J. Word list memory predicts everyday function and problem-solving in the elderly: results from the ACTIVE cognitive intervention trial. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2011 Mar;18(2):129-46. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2010.516814. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ball K, Edwards JD, Ross LA, McGwin G Jr. Cognitive training decreases motor vehicle collision involvement of older drivers. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Nov;58(11):2107-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03138.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Parisi JM, Gross AL, Rebok GW, Saczynski JS, Crowe M, Cook SE, Langbaum JB, Sartori A, Unverzagt FW. Modeling change in memory performance and memory perceptions: findings from the ACTIVE study. Psychol Aging. 2011 Sep;26(3):518-24. doi: 10.1037/a0022458.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
O'Connor ML, Edwards JD, Small BJ, Andel R. Patterns of level and change in self-reported driving behaviors among older adults: who self-regulates? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 Jul;67(4):437-46. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr122. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gross AL, Rebok GW. Memory training and strategy use in older adults: results from the ACTIVE study. Psychol Aging. 2011 Sep;26(3):503-17. doi: 10.1037/a0022687.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gross AL, Rebok GW, Unverzagt FW, Willis SL, Brandt J. Cognitive predictors of everyday functioning in older adults: results from the ACTIVE Cognitive Intervention Trial. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011 Sep;66(5):557-66. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr033. Epub 2011 May 9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Unverzagt FW, Guey LT, Jones RN, Marsiske M, King JW, Wadley VG, Crowe M, Rebok GW, Tennstedt SL. ACTIVE cognitive training and rates of incident dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 Jul;18(4):669-77. doi: 10.1017/S1355617711001470. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sisco SM, Marsiske M. Neighborhood Influences on Late Life Cognition in the ACTIVE Study. J Aging Res. 2012;2012:435826. doi: 10.1155/2012/435826. Epub 2012 Aug 26.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gross AL, Inouye SK, Rebok GW, Brandt J, Crane PK, Parisi JM, Tommet D, Bandeen-Roche K, Carlson MC, Jones RN. Parallel but not equivalent: challenges and solutions for repeated assessment of cognition over time. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012;34(7):758-72. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2012.681628. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gross AL, Rebok GW, Brandt J, Tommet D, Marsiske M, Jones RN. Modeling learning and memory using verbal learning tests: results from ACTIVE. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Mar;68(2):153-67. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs053. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sartori AC, Wadley VG, Clay OJ, Parisi JM, Rebok GW, Crowe M. The relationship between cognitive function and life space: the potential role of personal control beliefs. Psychol Aging. 2012 Jun;27(2):364-74. doi: 10.1037/a0025212. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lin F, Chen DG, Vance DE, Ball KK, Mapstone M. Longitudinal relationships between subjective fatigue, cognitive function, and everyday functioning in old age. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Feb;25(2):275-85. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212001718. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, Jobe JB, Leveck MD, Marsiske M, Morris JN, Rebok GW, Smith DM, Tennstedt SL, Unverzagt FW, Willis SL; Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Study Group. Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002 Nov 13;288(18):2271-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2271.
Reference Type
RESULT
Willis SL, Tennstedt SL, Marsiske M, Ball K, Elias J, Koepke KM, Morris JN, Rebok GW, Unverzagt FW, Stoddard AM, Wright E; ACTIVE Study Group. Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. JAMA. 2006 Dec 20;296(23):2805-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.23.2805.
Reference Type
RESULT
Phillips CB, McVey A, Sprague BN, Cooper K, Stephan AT, Ross LA. Predictive Utility of Four Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Assessments and Cognitive Status Changes Among Cognitively In-Tact Older Adults. J Aging Health. 2024 Nov 9:8982643241297193. doi: 10.1177/08982643241297193. Online ahead of print.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Drahota A, Udell JE, Mackenzie H, Pugh MT. Psychological and educational interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 3;10(10):CD013480. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013480.pub2.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Sprague BN, Ross LA, Ball KK. Does Cognitive Training Reduce Falls across Ten Years?: Data from the ACTIVE Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 11;20(6):4941. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064941.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Bell TR, Sprague BN, Ross LA. Longitudinal associations of pain and cognitive decline in community-dwelling older adults. Psychol Aging. 2022 Sep;37(6):715-730. doi: 10.1037/pag0000699. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Chamberlain JD, Sprague BN, Ross LA. Age- and Time-Varying Associations Between Subjective Health and Episodic Memory in Older Adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Apr 1;77(4):673-682. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab142.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Clark DO, Xu H, Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW. Does Body Mass Index Modify Memory, Reasoning, and Speed of Processing Training Effects in Older Adults. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Nov;24(11):2319-2326. doi: 10.1002/oby.21631.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IA0091
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Smartphone App to Improve Physical Activity in Older Adults With MCI/Mild Dementia
NCT04950998
COMPLETED
NA
The PREVENTION Trial: Precision Recommendations to Optimize Neurocognition
NCT04082611
COMPLETED
NA
Mindful Awareness Program for the Prevention of Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02286791
COMPLETED
NA
Cognitive Screening and Cognitive Training in Seniors
NCT02588209
COMPLETED
NA
Empowerment Intervention for Persons With Young Onset Dementia
NCT02937883
COMPLETED
NA
Alzheimer's Disease Multiple Intervention Trial
NCT01314950
COMPLETED
NA
Use of Autobiographical and Interest Assessment for a Better Stimulation of Patients in Nursing Home
NCT01314131
UNKNOWN
NA
On Site Sensors Monitoring Impacts of Cognitive Decline on ADLs
NCT04871698
UNKNOWN
Predictive Factors and Autonomy Level Change
NCT02302482
RECRUITING
NA
Digital Detection of Dementia (D Cubed) Studies: D3
NCT06224205
RECRUITING
NA
Home-Based Assessment for Alzheimer Disease Prevention
NCT00546767
COMPLETED
NA
Lifestyle Intervention in the Memory Clinics of General and Academic Hospitals Trial
NCT06832761
RECRUITING
NA
Effects of an Exercise Program for Nursing Home Patients With Dementia
NCT02262104
COMPLETED
NA
User-Led Meaningful Activity and Early-Stage Dementia
NCT05159869
COMPLETED
NA
ACAR Brain Health Intervention Study
NCT04208880
UNKNOWN
NA
A Trial of the C-TraC Intervention for Dementia Patients
NCT02388711
COMPLETED
NA
Dementia Patient's Behavior Evaluation Using Noninvasive Ambient Sensor
NCT03120741
UNKNOWN
Preventing Alzheimer's With Cognitive Training
NCT03848312
RECRUITING
PHASE3
A Multidomain Intervention Program for Older People With Dementia
NCT04948450
COMPLETED
NA
Trauma Medical Home for Older Injured Patients
NCT03108820
COMPLETED
NA
Implementation of Function Focused Care in Acute Care
NCT04235374
COMPLETED
NA
BCT Intervention For Walking Habit Among Caregivers of People With AD/ADRD
NCT06803797
RECRUITING
NA
Developing a Nonpharmacological Pain Intervention for Community-dwelling Older Adults With Dementia
NCT06264362
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
A BCT Intervention for an Hourly Activity Habit Among Caregivers for Persons With AD/ADRD
NCT06801912
RECRUITING
NA
Connect-Home: Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias
NCT06840587
RECRUITING
NA