Plyometric vs Resistance Training for Trunk Balance in Children With Spina Bifida

NCT ID: NCT07125807

Last Updated: 2025-08-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-01

Study Completion Date

2025-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of upper extremity plyometric and resistance exercises in improving trunk balance in children with Spina Bifida (SB).

Methods: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 28 children (aged 6-12 years) with lumbar-level SB, randomized to plyometric (n=14) or resistance (n=14) exercise groups for an 8-week intervention (3 days/week) alongside standard rehabilitation. Primary outcomes included Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) for static/dynamic sitting and reaching, and Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS) for overall balance. Secondary outcomes included ambulation levels via Hoffer classification.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective:

To compare the effectiveness of upper extremity plyometric versus resistance exercises in enhancing trunk balance among children with lumbar-level Spina Bifida (SB).

Methods:

This randomized controlled trial included 28 children (aged 6-12 years) diagnosed with lumbar-level SB. Participants were randomly assigned to either a plyometric exercise group (n = 14) or a resistance exercise group (n = 14). Both groups received an 8-week intervention (three sessions per week) in addition to their standard rehabilitation programs.

Primary outcomes were assessed using the Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS)-evaluating static sitting, dynamic sitting, and reaching control-and the Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS) to assess overall balance capabilities. Secondary outcomes included ambulation status, measured using the Hoffer classification.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spina Bifida Balance Changes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Plyometric

plyometric exercises for trunk and sitting balance

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

upper extremity plyometric exercises

Intervention Type OTHER

upper extremity plyometric exercises in neuro rehabilitation

Resistance

resistance exercises for trunk and sitting balance

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

upper extremity resistance exercises

Intervention Type OTHER

upper extremity resistance exercises in neuro rehabilitation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

upper extremity plyometric exercises

upper extremity plyometric exercises in neuro rehabilitation

Intervention Type OTHER

upper extremity resistance exercises

upper extremity resistance exercises in neuro rehabilitation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The study included children diagnosed with lumbar-level Spina Bifida,
* Aged 6 to 15 years,
* IQ of 50 or higher based on the SPARCLE cognitive assessment

Exclusion Criteria

* History of shunt infection or revision,
* Tethered cord syndrome or syringomyelia,
* Insufficient sitting balance,
* Upper extremity spasticity or contractures,
* Severe visual or hearing impairments
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Okan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ozgur Surenkok

Assit.Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

istanbul Okan University

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

61351342/020-512

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pully System Exercise Role in Management of Spasticity
NCT06927869 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA