Impact of Standing Programs in Children With Spina Bifida: A Single Subject Design
NCT ID: NCT06419049
Last Updated: 2024-05-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-02-23
2025-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Is a home standing program effective in reducing lower extremity passive range of motion limitations in children with Spina Bifida?
2. Does a home standing program change the quality of functional movement in children with spina bifida?
3. Does a home standing program change a child's performance in daily activities, mobility, and social/cognitive domains?
4. Does a home standing program change a child's health-related quality of life in children with spinal bifida?
5. Does a home standing program result in a change in gait velocity in children with Spina Bifida?
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of a Standing Program in a Child With Spina Bifida: A Case Report
NCT05251740
Early Intensive Exercise to Improve Walking in Children With Spastic Diplegia
NCT03166293
Motion Analysis of Sit-to-Stand Movements in Children With Spastic Diplegia
NCT00314301
Plyometric vs Resistance Training for Trunk Balance in Children With Spina Bifida
NCT07125807
A New Training to Enhance Physical Activity in Adolescents With Cerebral Palsy
NCT05865418
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Stage 2: Intervention Stage A single-subject study ABABA design will be used with dependent variables of passive range of motion, functional movement, functional skills performance, engagement, health-related quality of life and gait velocity will be recorded repeatedly for the individual participants across time and with systematic manipulation of the independent variable, which is the standing home program intervention. The study will span 28 weeks for the intervention Stage 2, consisting of three baseline phases (A) of four weeks each and two home program intervention phases (B) of eight weeks each that alternate in an ABABA design.
Regardless of the phase, the following primary measures will be assessed at baseline and every two weeks from the beginning until the conclusion of the study: Goniometric passive range of motion for all phases and hip and knee angle measures while standing in the stander during intervention phases and 10 meter walk test at preferred walking speed.
The following secondary measures will be assessed at baseline and every two weeks in phase A and every four weeks in phase B until the study's conclusion: Pediatric Neuromuscular Recovery Scale, Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Computer Adapted Test and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory.
Nonintervention phase (A): The study investigator will meet face to face with the participant biweekly for 28 weeks to perform primary and secondary outcome measures. The Pediatric Neuromuscular Recovery Scale will be administered by the study investigator in person and scored by another investigator, who is an expert with the Pediatric Neuromuscular Recovery Scale, via video conference (not recorded).
Intervention phase (B): The study investigator will meet face to face with the participant biweekly for 28 weeks to perform outcome measures. The Pediatric Neuromuscular Recovery Scale will be administered by the study investigator in person and scored by another investigator via video conference. During the B phase, the study investigator will also provide parent instruction on the standing home program to ensure the parent and child can follow the home program. EasyStand will be providing the participants with the sit to stand stander for the duration of the intervention phases. A photo of the child in the stander will be taken by the investigator during each of these sessions and may be used in the dissemination of the project. The parent will keep a daily log of stander use and usual physical therapy-related activities. All of the measures will be analyzed to determine if there is a functional effect and if so, quantitative analysis methods will be used to determine the magnitude of the effect, and then the effect sizes will be combined to average intervention effects.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standing Program Intervention
A single-subject study ABABA design will be used with dependent variables of passive range of motion, functional movement, functional skills performance, engagement, health related quality of life and gait velocity will be recorded repeatedly for the individual participants across time and with systematic manipulation of the independent variable, which is the standing home program intervention. The study will span 28 weeks for the intervention Stage 2, consisting of three baseline phases (A) of four weeks each and two home program intervention phases (B) of eight weeks each that alternate in an ABABA design.
Altimate Medical EasyStand Bantam
Child will stand in stander 5 days per week for 60 min during each 8 wks intervention
Reliability
Children will be assessed by two study investigators in two different sessions on the same day, with a washout period of 3 hours between sessions. Intrarater reliability will be determined by comparing rater's scores for each child. These sessions will include goniometric measurements of lower extremity passive range of motion and the 10-Meter Walk Test. Children will have the opportunity to rest or resume normal activities with a minimum of 3 hours between sessions. Interrater reliability will be determined based on the measurements in the same session by 2 different raters.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Altimate Medical EasyStand Bantam
Child will stand in stander 5 days per week for 60 min during each 8 wks intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
5 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of St. Augustine
San Diego, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Marianne Hanover, DPT
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0819-275
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.