Motor Support Program for Multidimensional Development in Autistic Children
NCT ID: NCT07121231
Last Updated: 2025-08-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-08
2024-09-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of a Motor Support Program in Children With Autism
NCT07321561
The Effect of Exercise Practices on Hyperactivity Levels in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder
NCT06415539
Effects of Parent-child Co-participation in Physical Activity
NCT07236346
Exercise Efficacy on Autism Spectrum Disorder
NCT06831188
Effects of the Sherborne Developmental Movement Program on Motor Performance in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders
NCT06766942
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study was designed with a mixed method approach. Mixed method is an approach that aims to address research problems in a more in-depth and multidimensional way by combining the strengths of quantitative and qualitative research traditions. In the quantitative dimension of the study, the effects of the motor support program (MSP) applied to children with autism on motor skills, social skills, pre-academic skills, sensory profile and autism symptoms were evaluated with a pretest-posttest control group design. Qualitative data were collected through focus group interviews with parents, and family observations were analyzed in accordance with Braun and Clarke's (2006) thematic analysis process. Interviews were analyzed with open codes and themes were created according to content similarities.
The participants of the study consisted of a total of 30 children between the ages of 4-6 years diagnosed with autism attending four different special education and rehabilitation centers in Istanbul. This number of participants, determined as a result of the G\*Power analysis, was assigned equally to the experimental (n = 15) and control (n = 15) groups by random number generation method using Excel software. All participants were included in the study with the written consent of their parents, who were informed about the conditions of participation in the study. The inclusion criteria were that the participants were between the ages of 4 and 6, had been diagnosed with autism, had not participated in any MSP before, did not have a health problem that would constitute an obstacle to MSP implementation, and did not have secondary diagnoses such as visual or hearing impairment. The exclusion criteria included the detection of a health problem that prevented children in the experimental group from participating in the MSP, the participants in the experimental or control group not participating in the assessment tests, or voluntarily leaving the training or measurement process.
The Bruininks-Oseretsky Motor Competence Test-2 (BOT-2) was used to assess motor skills and took approximately 10-15 minutes for each child. The Pre-Academic Skills Assessment Form (PASAF), which was used to measure pre-academic skills, was administered in approximately 10-15 minutes. In the assessment of social skills, the Social Skills Assessment System Preschool Teacher Form (SSRS-PTF) was completed by the children's special education teachers in approximately 10 minutes for each child. The Adapted Autism Behavior Checklist, which was administered through face-to-face interviews with parents to determine the level of autism symptoms, took approximately 25-30 minutes for each child. Also, the interview questions used for the qualitative component were developed by the researchers and finalized following expert review. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews lasting approximately 30 minutes.
During the teaching sessions of the MSP in the implementation process, teaching strategies that are sensitive to the learning needs of autistic children were used. Pedagogical approaches such as structured instruction supported by activity charts and visual cues, guidance with clear and short instructions, allowing the child to make choices, providing concrete experiences and modeling were taken as basis. In this way, progress was made in the teaching process of each skill area with methods that were sensitive to individual differences and proven to be effective. At the end of each session, the child's interest and performance in the activities were evaluated with observation forms and these evaluations formed the basis for planning the next training sessions.The program was implemented by the researchers in the special education and rehabilitation centers where the children were studying. The implementation process lasted a total of 12 weeks, two days a week, 50 minutes a day. In line with the pre-test results, 30% (15 minutes) of the sessions were allocated to individual activities and 70% (35 minutes) to group activities that enabled children to interact, taking into account the areas that each child needed to be supported individually. Thus, in each session, both individualized support was provided and group activities that emphasized social interaction were intensively implemented. MSP implementations were carried out in the presence of the research team and eight special education teachers working in the institutions where the children attended. Each child was individually supported by at least one special education teacher during the implementation.The activities were structured in line with the motor development goals and physical activity outcomes of the preschool period. The implementation sessions have a four-stage structure: Warm-up phase: Consists of rhythmic warm-up movements such as walking, running, jumping (5 minutes); Preparation phase: Physical preparation for the target skills is provided with functional exercises that improve joint mobility and flexibility (5 minutes); Main activity phase: Consists of individual and group activities based on basic movement skills, supporting motor, social and pre-academic skills (35 minutes); and End phase: The session ends with games played with the participation of the whole group, reinforcing target skills and increasing social interaction (5 minutes).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Motor Support Program
Participants in this group completed a motor skills support program designed with a holistic approach to support cognitive development through concepts such as color, shape, and number, as well as social skills such as greeting, lining up, and cooperation, through activities based on basic motor skills such as throwing, catching, running, and jumping.
Motor Support Program
The MSP was implemented over 12 weeks, two days a week, 50 minutes per session. Based on pre-test results, 30% (15 minutes) of each session was devoted to individualized activities, and 70% (35 minutes) to group activities supporting peer interaction. This structure allowed for both personalized support and social engagement. The program was carried out by the research team and eight special education teachers at the children's rehabilitation centers. Each child received one-on-one support from at least one teacher. Activities were aligned with preschool motor development goals and followed a four-phase structure: (1) Warm-up (5 min): rhythmic movements (e.g., walking, running, jumping); (2) Preparation (5 min): functional exercises for flexibility and joint mobility; (3) Main activity (35 min): individual and group exercises to enhance motor, social, and pre-academic skills; (4) Cool-down (5 min): group games reinforcing learned skills and social interaction.
Standard Education (No Motor Support)
Participants in the control group continued their individual education programs. However, they did not participate in any physiotherapy or motor support programs. Only pre- and post-test measurements were taken.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Motor Support Program
The MSP was implemented over 12 weeks, two days a week, 50 minutes per session. Based on pre-test results, 30% (15 minutes) of each session was devoted to individualized activities, and 70% (35 minutes) to group activities supporting peer interaction. This structure allowed for both personalized support and social engagement. The program was carried out by the research team and eight special education teachers at the children's rehabilitation centers. Each child received one-on-one support from at least one teacher. Activities were aligned with preschool motor development goals and followed a four-phase structure: (1) Warm-up (5 min): rhythmic movements (e.g., walking, running, jumping); (2) Preparation (5 min): functional exercises for flexibility and joint mobility; (3) Main activity (35 min): individual and group exercises to enhance motor, social, and pre-academic skills; (4) Cool-down (5 min): group games reinforcing learned skills and social interaction.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Had been diagnosed with autism.
* Had not participated in any Motor Skills Program (MSP) before.
* Did not have any health problems that would prevent MSP implementation.
* Did not have secondary diagnoses, such as visual or hearing impairment.
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-participation in the assessment tests by participants in either the experimental or control group.
* Voluntary withdrawal from the training or measurement process.
4 Years
6 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gülsüm HATİPOĞLU ÖZCAN
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa
Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Aykır A, Tekinarslan İ. C. Adaptation of the Social Skills Rating System (SBDS) preschool teacher form into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Education and Science. 2012; 37(165): 3-17.
Kayıhan H, Günel M. K, Bumin G. Adaptation of the Sensory Profile into Turkish for children aged 3-10 years: A validity and reliability study. Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation. 2011; 22(2): 44-53.
Özcan G. H. Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu Tanısı Almış Çocuklarda Hareket Eğitimi Programının Akademik Beceriler, Motor Beceriler ve Sosyal İletişim Becerileri Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi (PhD thesis) İstanbul: Marmara University; 2022.
Krug DA, Arick J, Almond P. Behavior checklist for identifying severely handicapped individuals with high levels of autistic behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1980 Jul;21(3):221-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1980.tb01797.x. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IYYU-KAEK-16-11-2023-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.