Comparing Patient Reported Outcomes and Clinical Outcomes Based on Different Scar Placement in Patients Undergoing Standard Breast Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer: The PROM-S Study.
NCT ID: NCT07116642
Last Updated: 2025-08-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-02-20
2027-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Scar placement for sBCS can be divided into two groups: those directly over the cancer, or those in remote locations (e.g. around the nipple, near the armpit, the lower part of the breast, where the breast and the chest meet etc.) with the aim of hiding the scar in more visually acceptable locations on the breast. Multiple factors determine where the scar is placed such as aesthetics, other health conditions, location of the cancer, etc. However, it is currently unclear whether the location of scar placement for sBCS affects patient reported outcomes.
The growing importance on breast cosmesis has led to more attention from clinicians and patients with regards to the selection of surgical incision placement for sBCS. By using a validated questionnaire (BREAST-Q), we wish to assess if there is any difference in PROMs based on scar placement (over the lesion vs. remote) in patients undergoing sBCS.
It is anticipated that the study results will help champion and guide care for future breast cancer patients, as well as providing an insight into how patient satisfaction may vary between different sBCS approaches.
This questionnaire study will include consecutive patients undergoing sBCS at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust.
Participation in this non-randomised study will not impact on routine clinical care or decision making for the type of surgery planned or scar placement choice. Patients will be asked to complete the BREAST-Q questionnaire prior to surgery, after 2 weeks, as well as 3 and 12 months after surgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Patient Reported Outcome Measures Using the BREAST-Q Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Pre Versus Sub-pectoral Implant Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
NCT04842240
Patient Reported Outcomes After Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery
NCT05724758
Feasibility Trial of ScarWork for Post-breast Surgery Pain Syndrome.
NCT07206394
Patient Report Outcome and Oncological Safety -Oncoplastic and Conventional BCS Cohort
NCT05054777
Aspects of Breast-conserving Surgery
NCT04227613
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A number of factors dictate the outcome of scar placement such as aesthetics, comorbidities, location of the cancer, etc. However, it is currently unclear whether the location of scar placement for sBCS affects patient reported outcomes in short- or long- term post-surgery as we do not have sufficient information from the patient's point of view of their experience and satisfaction.
We will use a validated patient outcomes questionnaire for breast surgery (BREAST-Q) to compare patient satisfaction with scar placement (over the lesion vs. remote) for patients undergoing sBCS. We hope that the results will provide valuable additional information when future patients are counselled with regards to scar placement.
The principle research objective is to assess the impact of scar placement location on patient reported and clinical outcomes utilising the BREAST-Q questionnaire in patients undergoing standard breast conserving surgery (sBCS).
Secondary objectives include:
* comparing aesthetic outcome (appearance) and functional outcome of standard breast conserving surgery based on scar placement using Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) from the patients' point of view.
* comparing clinical outcomes between over the lesion vs. remote scar placement in patients undergoing standard breast conserving surgery
* explore potential factors that influence the locations of scar placement for standard breast conserving surgery (surgeon / clinical factors).
* explore the extent of patient involvement in decision-making process This is a single-centre, non-randomised observational study that aims to recruit a minimum of 75 participants. The surgery could be for invasive or non-invasive breast cancer, with or without axilla surgery. All patients will be invited to complete the BREAST-Q patient reported outcome questionnaire on four occasions. The four time points are: before surgery, 2 weeks after surgery and at 3 and 12 months after surgery.The BREAST-Q is a standardised and validated questionnaire that covers symptoms and issues such as physical, sexual and psychosocial well-being, satisfaction with breasts, the impact of radiotherapy and satisfaction with the treating medical team and the level of information provided.
The patient will receive instructions for completing the questionnaires from the study team. These can be completed either in paper forms or electronically. Additionally, socio-demographic and routine clinical data collected as part of standard care (including but not limited to complications and other treatments required, such as radiotherapy) will be recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to provide written informed consent
* Invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) suitable for sBCS (including multifocal cancers requiring x2 wires or magseeds)
* Able to understand and complete the questionnaire
Scar over the lesion defined as radial, transverse, vertical, oblique scar over the tumour lesion location in the breast Remote incisions defined as lateral perimeter/periareolar/infra-mammary fold/ benelli/hemi-batwing
* No restrictions on tumour size (decision on suitability for sBCS will be based on clinical assessment)
* Any axillary nodal staging status
* Bilateral cancers allowed
* Post neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) allowed
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients undergoing oBCS (such as wise pattern, vertical scar mastopexy incision pattern or volume replacement chest wall perforator flap)
* Patients undergoing mastectomy with or without immediate autologous or implant reconstruction
* Patients requiring nipple excision (central wide local excision)
* Patients undergoing wide local excision under local anaesthetic
* Women not able or willing to give informed consent
* Where close tumour proximity to skin or skin involvement necessitates skin excision over the tumour
* Patients diagnosed with locoregional recurrence
* Patients diagnosed with associated distant metastasis
* Patients undergoing diagnostic excision surgery for atypical breast lesions or benign lesions
* Patients diagnosed with phyllodes lesion
* Patients who have had previous ipsilateral breast surgery (any type)
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sue Dr Hartup, PhD, RN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St James's University Hospital
Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CO24/163189
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.