Comparing Two Different Surgical Techniques for Breast Reconstruction
NCT ID: NCT04716959
Last Updated: 2022-01-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE3
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-14
2021-12-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The standard approach used at MSK is the subpectoral technique. This study will help researchers find out whether the subpectoral approach is better, the same as, or worse than the prepectoral approach. To decide which approach is better, the researchers will look at which technique causes fewer complications after surgery (for example, infection or the need for a second surgery). Researchers are also interested in seeing which approach causes less pain and use of pain medication after surgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prepectoral vs Partial Subpectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
NCT04874402
Prospective Trial of Subcutaneous Versus Subpectoral 2-Staged Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
NCT02775409
Efficacy and Safety of Prepectoral Prosthesis Immediate One-Stage Breast Reconstruction Versus Two-Stage Expander/Prosthesis Reconstruction in Postoperative Adjuvant Radiotherapy Breast Cancer Patients: A Prospective, Single-Center, Cohort Study
NCT07037576
Pre- Versus Sub-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction After Skin-sparing Mastectomy or Nipple-sparing Mastectomy OPBC-02PREPEC
NCT04293146
Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
NCT04688697
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
The prepectoral approach involves placing the tissue expander on top of the pectoralis muscle.
Subpectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
Subpectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
The subpectoral approach involves placing the tissue expander under the pectoralis muscle with or without acellular dermal matrix (ADM).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
The prepectoral approach involves placing the tissue expander on top of the pectoralis muscle.
Subpectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
The subpectoral approach involves placing the tissue expander under the pectoralis muscle with or without acellular dermal matrix (ADM).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Planning to undergo immediate two stage prosthetic breast reconstruction with TE placement as the first stage.
* Planning to undergo unilateral or bilateral mastectomy.
* Planning to undergo nipple- or skin-sparing mastectomy.
* Mastectomy weight less than 800 grams.
* Adequate mastectomy skin perfusion or patients with adequate perfusion but nonviable mastectomy skin that can be excised (≤ 4 cm) at the defect margins with otherwise adequate perfusion.
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of preoperative axillary lymph node metastasis.
* Presence of intraoperative sentinel node positivity.
* History of radiotherapy.
* Current smoker.
* Planning to undergo direct-to-implant reconstruction.
* BMI \>35.
* Prior sternotomy.
21 Years
60 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Evan Matros, MD, MMSc, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Memorial Sloan Kettering BaskingRidge (Consent and Followup)
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Monmouth (Consent and Followup)
Middletown, New Jersey, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Bergen (Consent and Followup )
Montvale, New Jersey, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Commack (Consent and Followup)
Commack, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Westchester (Consent and Followup)
Harrison, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (All Protocol Activities)
New York, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Nassau (Consent and Followup)
Rockville Centre, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20-565
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.