Methodology to Transfer High Volumes of Data for Distant Expert Radiographic Evaluation of Pelvic Ring Injuries

NCT ID: NCT07115602

Last Updated: 2025-08-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this retrospective cohort study based on a prospectively filled registry was to determine whether standard anteroposterior pelvic radiographs with and without pelvic binder provide valuable information on pelvic ring injury anatomy and stability when compared to computed tomography images alone. The ultimate goal was to improve the management of these injuries in both emergency and definitive treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

At the core of the study was a stepwise pelvic imaging evaluation of pelvic ring injury patients by a panel of international pelvic trauma experts. The assessment was conducted in 3 sequential steps:

1. Review of computed tomography images alone.
2. Addition of a standard anteroposterior pelvic radiograph with a pelvic binder.
3. Addition of a standard anteroposterior pelvic radiograph without a pelvic binder.

At each step, experts independently classified the injury (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthsesfragen / Orthopaedic Trauma Association and Young and Burgess classifications), assessed mechanical stability and recommended definitive treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Ring Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pelvic ring injury patients with operative management within 3 weeks from injury

Pelvic ring injury patients with operative management within 3 weeks from injury

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1\) admission to the author's institution between January 2012 and December 2023;
* 2\) high-energy pelvic ring injury involving a non-pathologic pelvis (i.e., no prior injury, pathology, or surgery compromising image interpretation), surgically treated within three weeks of injury;
* 3\) age ≥18 years at the time of trauma.

Exclusion Criteria

* 1\) imaging acquired after any kind of surgical stabilization (i.e. emergent external fixation), which could bias injury assessment;
* 2\) incomplete imaging dataset, defined as the absence of any of the following: pelvic computed tomography, standard anteroposterior pelvic radiograph with pelvic binder, and standard anteroposterior pelvic radiograph without pelvic binder;
* 3\) poor image quality, including incomplete pelvic coverage, computed tomography slice thickness \>2 mm, motion artifacts, or incompatibility with the image viewer used for the study;
* 4\) documented (written or verbal) refusal to participate.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Axel Gamulin

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Axel Gamulin

Dr Axel GAMULIN, MD, PD, CC, FMH, Senior Staff Surgeon

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VMOO_MDThesis_M_&_M

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Knee Injury Decision
NCT02856945 UNKNOWN
Functional MR Urography
NCT00301470 COMPLETED PHASE4
Antiseptic-coated Intermittent Urinary Catheter
NCT02697162 WITHDRAWN PHASE2/PHASE3