Imaging and Histopathological Examination for Evaluation of Pediatric Appendicitis Score
NCT ID: NCT03171662
Last Updated: 2017-06-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
75 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-07-01
2019-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Management of Acute Appendicitis Before Emergency Department in Children: a Prospective Study
NCT04885335
Role of Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Acute Abdomen in Pediatric Group
NCT03259048
Point of Care 3D Ultrasound for Pediatric Appendicitis: a Pilot Study
NCT02507674
Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC) in Children With Appendix Ultrasounds
NCT03522233
Study for a Rational Management of Appendicitis in Children
NCT01067937
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The use of a clinical score, based on patient history and examination, is one way to possibly improve the diagnostic procedure. There are several available scores. In this systematic review, Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) were considered the most reliable. Pediatric Appendicitis Score is the only score specifically developed for children, composed by Samuel in 2002 when analyzing children between 4 and 15 years of age. Pediatric Appendicitis Score has been validated and recommended by some authors, but only one of these studies has included children less than 4 years of age.
We hypothesized that PAS could be helpful in diagnosing young children with appendicitis and that we would find both parent delay and doctor delay contributing to the often late diagnosis in this age group. The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate Pediatric Appendicitis Score in children, operated on for suspected appendicitis, with respect to Pediatric Appendicitis Score sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value; (2) investigate if there was a delay in diagnosing appendicitis; and (3) identify factors responsible for the possible late diagnosis in younger children In order to improve the diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis, ultrasound, computed tomography and post-appendectomy histopathological examination have been used as clinical aids in cutting down the rate of negative appendectomy without increasing morbidity and mortality.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
group study
Imaging and Histopathological examination for Evaluation of Pediatric Appendicitis Score
Evaluation of Pediatric Appendicitis Score
Imaging and Histopathological examination for Evaluation of Pediatric Appendicitis Score
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Evaluation of Pediatric Appendicitis Score
Imaging and Histopathological examination for Evaluation of Pediatric Appendicitis Score
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. Complicated appendicitis ( mass or abcess ).
3. Patient with recent history of any abdominal surgeries.
1 Year
15 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Samir Rateeb
principle investigator
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PASE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.