CT Scan Using IV Contrast Alone for Pediatric Appendicitis

NCT ID: NCT00716703

Last Updated: 2008-07-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-11-30

Study Completion Date

2005-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Computed tomography (CT) scan using intravenous contrast (CT IV) as the sole type of contrast material, was studied as one method of evaluating children with suspected appendicitis. We felt that this technique could provide physicians with a faster and better-tolerated alternative to CT imaging which involves patients drinking oral contrast or needing rectal contrast administered.

SPECIFIC AIMS

1. To test an imaging protocol using CT IV for the evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children in the setting of a pediatric emergency department (ED).
2. To determine test performance characteristics (specificity, sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy) of CT IV in detecting appendicitis in children.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was to be a prospective cohort study imaging pediatric patients (3-18 years old) in whom the diagnosis of appendicitis was suspected, but not clinically apparent. Patients that were to have a CT performed would be invited to participate and if enrolled, would be imaged using CT scan with IV contrast alone.

CT scans would be interpreted in real time by a resident radiologist and/or an attending radiologist. ED evaluation would remain unchanged and patient disposition would be based on the discretion of the ED provider using all information (patient exam, labs, surgical consultation as needed and the results of the CT scan).

CT scan performance would be determined by comparison of the CT interpretation with patient final outcomes as determined by either (1) pathology reports - in patients that went on to have surgery (appendectomy) or (2) clinical phone follow up at 24 hrs and then 1 week after ED discharge.

Performance of CT would be compared between the resident and the attending radiologists.

Further, we would compare the time to obtain a CT scan (defined as ED triage time - Time to CT) between our study cohort and a retrospective cohort of patients who had received CT scan in the ED for evaluation of appendicitis pre-study (CT using BOTH IV and oral contrast).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Appendicitis Child Contrast Media

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Appendicitis Computed tomography pediatric child sensitivity specificity contrast administration route time factors

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

cohort = pediatric patients in the ED (3-18 yo) with abdominal pain suspicious for appendicitis that are to undergo CT scan

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CT Scan using IV contrast alone

Intervention Type OTHER

CT scan using IV contrast alone

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CT Scan using IV contrast alone

CT scan using IV contrast alone

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 3- 18 years
* Signs/symptoms for \< 72 hours
* CT Scan requested for evaluation by attending or fellow

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinically apparent appendicitis
* Pregnancy
* Sickle Cell Disease
* Known contrast allergy
* Previous enrollment
* Signs/symptoms for \> 72 hrs
* Known abdominal disease (e.g. Crohn's)
* Exam unreliable (neurologically impaired patient)
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Rochester

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of Rochester, Dept of Emergency Medicine

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Madelyn Garcia, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Rochester

Lynn Babcock-Cimpello, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Rochester

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Rochester

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RSRB9986

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id