Adhesive Devices Versus Elastic Devices for Urinary Catheter Securement in Critically Ill Patients Experimental Study
NCT ID: NCT07093437
Last Updated: 2025-12-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
188 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-22
2026-10-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions the trial aims to answer are:
* Which device type better prevents injuries to the urethral meatus?
* Which device reduces discomfort for patients?
* Which device lowers the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections?
Participants will:
* Use either an adhesive or an elastic device to secure their urinary catheter during their stay in critical care
* Be monitored regularly to assess any injuries, discomfort, or infections related to the catheter
* Provide feedback on their comfort and any complications experienced, if they are able to communicate
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of a Zinc Oxide Adhesive Securement Device in the Fixation of Midline and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Hospitalized Adult Patients
NCT06770374
"Comparison of Two Methods of Securing Endotracheal Tubes in Intensive Care : Elastic Adhesive Strips vs Lace In A Protective Sheath."
NCT04819425
Advanced Dressings for CVC Infection Prevention in PICU
NCT07175116
The Prevention of Postoperative Epidural Catheter Migration: a Comparison of Three Types of Dressing
NCT00764283
AMBULATE: Cardiva Mid-Bore VVCS vs. Manual Compression for Multiple Femoral Venous Access Sites, 6 - 12F ID
NCT03193021
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Among the most relevant complications are three. First, catheter-associated urethral meatus injuries, which are lesions caused by continuous pressure from the catheter on surrounding tissues, affecting the glans, penis, or labia minora. The prevalence of these injuries in critically ill patients ranges between 13 % and 36 %. Secondly, pain and discomfort, occurring in approximately 47 % of UC users. Thirdly, catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is a frequent complication; in Spanish ICUs, it has accounted for 25 % to 30 % of all device-associated infections in recent years.
Securing urinay catheter to the leg is recommended by several international clinical practice guidelines (CPG) to prevent complications associated with UC use. In Spain, the national ITU ZERO initiative-led by the Ministry of Health and the Spanish Society of Intensive and Coronary Care Nursing-includes catheter securement as part of recommended care to reduce the risk of UC-related UTIs in critically ill patients.
Recent studies have evaluated the effectiveness of thigh securement of UC in ICU patients. One 2024 study showed that secured catheters significantly reduced the incidence of meatal injuries, decreased associated discomfort and lowered the risk of CAUTI.
Nowadays, two main types of commercial catheter securement devices are available: elastic wristband-style devices and adhesive-based devices. However, recent studies have not directly compared the effectiveness of these two types, and expert opinions vary.
Moreover, CPG recommend securement devices but do not specify which method is best for critically ill patients. This lack of clear guidelines and robust scientific evidence has resulted in low adherence to catheter securement practices among nurses. Prevalence studies from Canada and the UK (2016) reported low adherence rates. A recent qualitative study concluded that this low adherence stemmed from lack of training, ambiguous recommendations, limited scientific evidence, and insufficient engagement of nursing staff in care research.
In conclusion, urinary catheter securement in critically ill patients is a fundamental intervention for preventing complications, yet there remains a clear lack of comparative evidence between available devices, limiting professionals' ability to select the safest and most effective option. This knowledge gap justifies the need for research to determine which of the two securement types-adhesive or elastic-is more beneficial in this patient population.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Hypothesis: In critically ill patients, urinary catheter securement using adhesive devices is more effective than elastic wristband-style devices in preventing urethral meatus injuries, reducing discomfort, and decreasing the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections.
It is proposed that adhesive devices provide greater stability and exert less pressure on tissues, thereby reducing iatrogenic complication risk and improving patient well-being, compared with elastic devices that may cause vascular compromise or skin irritation in edematous or fragile-skin patients.
This hypothesis will be tested by comparing both securement methods in terms of incidence of injuries, pain, and urinary tract infections in critically ill patients requiring long-term urinary catheters.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ OBJECTIVES
Primary Objective:
To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of adhesive versus elastic wristband securement devices for urinary catheters in preventing catheter-associated complications in critically ill patients.
Secondary Objectives:
* Compare the effectiveness of adhesive versus elastic securement in preventing urethral meatus injuries in critically ill patients.
* Evaluate the effect of adhesive versus elastic securement on reducing discomfort and pain related to catheter use in critically ill patients able to communicate.
* Compare the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections between groups using adhesive versus elastic securement devices.
* Analyze patient perceptions and experiences (in communicative patients) regarding the two types of securement devices.
* Identify and describe adverse events related to securement device use, such as catheter obstruction, skin lesions, and accidental catheter dislodgment.
METHODOLOGY This study will be conducted in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. It is an experimental, randomized, open-label trial with two intervention groups. Group 1 (G1) patients will receive urinary catheter securement using a commercially available adhesive device, while Group 2 (G2) patients will use an elastic wristband device. In this study, patients will be randomly assigned to G1 or to G2.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Urinary catheter securement with adhesive device
* Site of catheter securement: The urinary catheter will be secured on the anterior aspect of the thigh. The exact placement site will be chosen with the patient's leg bent, to ensure that the securement allows for future leg movement without causing tension or pulling on the catheter.
* Catheter anchoring method: In female patients, the catheter will be anchored at the "Y" junction of the urinary catheter. In male patients, since the external portion of the catheter is shorter, the anchoring will be done just after the sampling port of the urine collection system.
* Skin protection: Before applying the adhesive, a protective barrier spray (Cavilon® spray, 3M) will be applied to the selected skin area to prevent potential skin injury
* Application: The device will be applied following the manufacturer's instructions.
* Replacement: The device will be changed every 72 hours or sooner if needed. The thigh used for securement will be alterned at every change.
GRIP-LOK FOLEY SECUREMENT DEVICE ®
* Used device: adhesive
* Specific Skin protection: with non alcohol barrier film
Urinary catheter securement with elastic device
* Site of catheter securement: The urinary catheter will be secured on the anterior aspect of the thigh. The exact placement site will be selected with the patient's leg bent, to ensure that the securement allows for subsequent leg movement without causing pulling or tension on the catheter.
* Catheter anchoring method: In female patients, the catheter will be anchored at the "Y" junction of the urinary catheter. In male patients, since the external portion of the catheter is shorter, the anchoring will be done just after the sampling port of the urine collection system.
* Skin protection: The elastic band will be adjusted appropriately to minimize catheter movement while allowing normal blood circulation in the limb.
* Application: The device will be applied following the manufacturer's instructions.
* Replacement:The device will be changed every 72 hours, or sooner if necessary. The thigh used for securement will be alternated at every change
CONVEEN, ELASTIC LEG WRISTBAND FOR URINARY CATHETER
The elastic wristband will be adjusted appropriately to minimize catheter movement while allowing normal blood circulation in the limb.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GRIP-LOK FOLEY SECUREMENT DEVICE ®
* Used device: adhesive
* Specific Skin protection: with non alcohol barrier film
CONVEEN, ELASTIC LEG WRISTBAND FOR URINARY CATHETER
The elastic wristband will be adjusted appropriately to minimize catheter movement while allowing normal blood circulation in the limb.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Pacients with an urinary catheter inserted within the past 24 hours
* Expected duration of catheterization \>48 hours
* Estimated ICU lenght os stay \> 48 hours
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with lesions at the urinary meatus, ongoing urinary tract infection or suspected infection
* Presence of urological or prostatic pathology
* Any condition that prevents securing the urinary catheter to the thigh, such as wounds, burns, or amputations
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital de la Santa creu i Sant Pau - Barcelona
OTHER
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Neus Calpe Damians, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut de Recerca Sant Pau
Barcelona, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Shenhar C, Mansvetov M, Baniel J, Golan S, Aharony S. Catheter-associated meatal pressure injury in hospitalized males. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Jun;39(5):1456-1463. doi: 10.1002/nau.24372. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
Jang EB, Hong SH, Kim KS, Park SY, Kim YT, Yoon YE, Moon HS. Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort: How Can We Manage It? Int Neurourol J. 2020 Dec;24(4):324-331. doi: 10.5213/inj.2040108.054. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
Wound Ostomy and Continence Care Nurses society. Indwelling Urinary Catheter Securement: Best Practice for Clinicians. WOCNS, USA;2012.
Calpe-Damians N, Wennberg-Capellades L, Ventura-Rosado A, Gonzalez-Engroba R, Enriquez-Perez N, Vicario-Martos C, Roldos-Gales A, Guri-Lopez T, Rafart-Aguado S, Ramirez-Ramon A, Llaurado-Serra M. Effectiveness and safety of a simple catheter securement device aimed at preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infection in intensive care unit patients: A randomized controlled trial. Nurs Crit Care. 2024 Nov;29(6):1788-1798. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13111. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
Holroyd S. The importance of indwelling urinary catheter securement. Br J Nurs. 2019 Aug 8;28(15):976-977. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2019.28.15.976. No abstract available.
Calpe-Damians N, Llaurado-Serra M, Wennberg-Capellades L. Knowledge and beliefs of intensive care nurses about urinary catheter securement: Results of a national survey. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2024 Apr;81:103572. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103572. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SLT035/24/000015
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IIBSP-DAE-2025-22
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.