AMBULATE: Cardiva Mid-Bore VVCS vs. Manual Compression for Multiple Femoral Venous Access Sites, 6 - 12F ID

NCT ID: NCT03193021

Last Updated: 2023-03-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

204 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-09-20

Study Completion Date

2018-04-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the trial is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Cardiva Mid-Bore Venous Vascular Closure System (VVCS) in sealing femoral venous access sites and providing reduced times to ambulation (TTA) compared with manual compression at the completion of catheter-based procedures performed through 6 - 12 Fr introducer sheaths.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A prospective, randomized, controlled multi-center clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the study device in sealing multiple femoral venous access sites and providing reduced times to ambulation compared with manual compression at the completion of catheter-based procedures performed through 6 - 12 Fr introducer sheaths.

Only patients with multiple access sites will be enrolled in order to support the desired indication. Randomization will be stratified to account for patients with varying numbers of access sites in a 1:1 treatment device to control arm ratio to ensure treatment and control arms have the same proportion of access sites/patient, i.e. 3 access sites/patient vs. 4 access sites/patient.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Surgical Wound

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Subjects randomized in 1:1 fashion to either Cardiva Mid-Bore Venous Vascular Closure Device (VVCD) or manual compression for multiple venous access site hemostasis
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Data Safety Monitoring Committee will adjudicate endpoint events, blinded to treatment assignment when possible

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cardiva Mid-Bore VVCS

Cardiva Mid-Bore VVCS will be used to close all femoral venous access sites at the end of the case.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cardiva Mid-Bore VVCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

The device will be used to close all femoral venous access sites at the end of the case, which range from 3 - 4 access sites per patient.

Manual Compression

Direct manual compression to the access sites will be used to close all femoral venous access sites at the end of the case.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Manual compression

Intervention Type OTHER

Manual compression will be used to achieve hemostasis in all femoral venous access sites when the sheaths are pulled, which range from 3-4 access sites per patient.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cardiva Mid-Bore VVCS

The device will be used to close all femoral venous access sites at the end of the case, which range from 3 - 4 access sites per patient.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Manual compression

Manual compression will be used to achieve hemostasis in all femoral venous access sites when the sheaths are pulled, which range from 3-4 access sites per patient.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Acceptable candidate for an elective, non-emergent catheter-based procedure via the common femoral vein(s) using a 6 to 12 Fr inner diameter introducer sheath, with a minimum of 3 and maximum of 4 femoral venous access sites, and a maximum of 2 access sites/leg
* Anticipated prolonged bedrest (5 hours or more) and / or overnight stay

Exclusion Criteria

* Active systemic or cutaneous infection, or inflammation in vicinity of the groin
* Pre-existing immunodeficiency disorder or chronic use of high dose systemic steroids
* Know history of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, hypercoagulability or platelet count \< 100,000 cells/mm3
* Severe co-existing morbidities with life expectancy less than 12 months
* Femoral arteriotomy or femoral venotomy in \< 10 days, or with any known vascular complications or residual hematoma, or with use of an intravascular closure device w/in previous 30 days
* Planned femoral venous or arterial access within next 30 days
* History of DVT, pulmonary embolism or thrombophlebitis
* Significant anemia or renal insufficiency
* BMI \> 45 kg/m2 or \< 20 kg/m2
* Unable to routinely walk at least 20 ft. without assistance
* LMWH within 8 hours before or after procedure
* Access site-specific eligibility criteria to exclude problems with gaining access or location of sheath; \< 6 Fr or \> 12 Fr inner diameter sheath use; obvious bleeding complications or tissue tract estimated to be \< 2.5 cm deep
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cardiva Medical, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrea Natale, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation

Steve Compton, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Alaska Heart Institute

Mintu Turakhia, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Stanford Center for Clinical Research

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alaska Heart & Vascular

Anchorage, Alaska, United States

Site Status

Mercy General Hospital

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford University Hospital

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Medstar Washington Hospital Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Emory St. Joseph's Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Advocate Christ Medical Center

Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States

Site Status

The Valley Hospital

Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Centennial Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Intermountain Health Care

Murray, Utah, United States

Site Status

University of Utah Health Sciences Center

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Natale A, Mohanty S, Liu PY, Mittal S, Al-Ahmad A, De Lurgio DB, Horton R, Spear W, Bailey S, Bunch J, Musat D, O'Neill P, Compton S, Turakhia MP; AMBULATE Trial Investigators. Venous Vascular Closure System Versus Manual Compression Following Multiple Access Electrophysiology Procedures: The AMBULATE Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Jan;6(1):111-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.08.013. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31971899 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PTL 0508

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

IMPEDE and IMPEDE-FX Embolization Plug Registry
NCT04044443 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING