AMBULATE: Cardiva Mid-Bore VVCS vs. Manual Compression for Multiple Femoral Venous Access Sites, 6 - 12F ID
NCT ID: NCT03193021
Last Updated: 2023-03-10
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
204 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-20
2018-04-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
AMBULATE Continued Access Protocol to Evaluate the Cardiva Mid-Bore Venous Vascular Closure System (VVCS)
NCT03573206
Feasibility and Safety of Total Percutaneous Closure of Femoral Arterial Access Sites in the Veno-arterial ECMO Patients
NCT04689451
AccuCathâ„¢ Intravenous (IV) Device Used by Vascular Access Team (VAT)
NCT01937195
Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of the Mynx Control Venous Vascular Closure Device 6F-12F vs Manual Compression
NCT05554471
Novel Strategy to Encourage Early Removal of Central Venous Catheters
NCT04136561
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Only patients with multiple access sites will be enrolled in order to support the desired indication. Randomization will be stratified to account for patients with varying numbers of access sites in a 1:1 treatment device to control arm ratio to ensure treatment and control arms have the same proportion of access sites/patient, i.e. 3 access sites/patient vs. 4 access sites/patient.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cardiva Mid-Bore VVCS
Cardiva Mid-Bore VVCS will be used to close all femoral venous access sites at the end of the case.
Cardiva Mid-Bore VVCS
The device will be used to close all femoral venous access sites at the end of the case, which range from 3 - 4 access sites per patient.
Manual Compression
Direct manual compression to the access sites will be used to close all femoral venous access sites at the end of the case.
Manual compression
Manual compression will be used to achieve hemostasis in all femoral venous access sites when the sheaths are pulled, which range from 3-4 access sites per patient.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cardiva Mid-Bore VVCS
The device will be used to close all femoral venous access sites at the end of the case, which range from 3 - 4 access sites per patient.
Manual compression
Manual compression will be used to achieve hemostasis in all femoral venous access sites when the sheaths are pulled, which range from 3-4 access sites per patient.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Anticipated prolonged bedrest (5 hours or more) and / or overnight stay
Exclusion Criteria
* Pre-existing immunodeficiency disorder or chronic use of high dose systemic steroids
* Know history of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, hypercoagulability or platelet count \< 100,000 cells/mm3
* Severe co-existing morbidities with life expectancy less than 12 months
* Femoral arteriotomy or femoral venotomy in \< 10 days, or with any known vascular complications or residual hematoma, or with use of an intravascular closure device w/in previous 30 days
* Planned femoral venous or arterial access within next 30 days
* History of DVT, pulmonary embolism or thrombophlebitis
* Significant anemia or renal insufficiency
* BMI \> 45 kg/m2 or \< 20 kg/m2
* Unable to routinely walk at least 20 ft. without assistance
* LMWH within 8 hours before or after procedure
* Access site-specific eligibility criteria to exclude problems with gaining access or location of sheath; \< 6 Fr or \> 12 Fr inner diameter sheath use; obvious bleeding complications or tissue tract estimated to be \< 2.5 cm deep
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cardiva Medical, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andrea Natale, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
Steve Compton, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Alaska Heart Institute
Mintu Turakhia, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Stanford Center for Clinical Research
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alaska Heart & Vascular
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Mercy General Hospital
Sacramento, California, United States
Stanford University Hospital
Stanford, California, United States
Medstar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Emory St. Joseph's Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Advocate Christ Medical Center
Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States
The Valley Hospital
Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States
Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, United States
Centennial Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
Austin, Texas, United States
Intermountain Health Care
Murray, Utah, United States
University of Utah Health Sciences Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Natale A, Mohanty S, Liu PY, Mittal S, Al-Ahmad A, De Lurgio DB, Horton R, Spear W, Bailey S, Bunch J, Musat D, O'Neill P, Compton S, Turakhia MP; AMBULATE Trial Investigators. Venous Vascular Closure System Versus Manual Compression Following Multiple Access Electrophysiology Procedures: The AMBULATE Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Jan;6(1):111-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.08.013. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PTL 0508
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.