Real World Use and Outcomes of VASCADE Closure Device Versus Manual Compression in Patients With CFA Disease
NCT ID: NCT04745624
Last Updated: 2022-02-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-08-20
2021-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility and Safety of Total Percutaneous Closure of Femoral Arterial Access Sites in the Veno-arterial ECMO Patients
NCT04689451
Groin Complications Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Either Manual Compression or PERCLOSE Device
NCT00842179
CaveoVasc System - a New Femoral Vascular Access and Closure Device
NCT02694549
Characteristics Predictive of Success and Complications in the Use of Suture-Mediated Closure of Femoral Venous Access
NCT00838175
The Ladera Suture-Mediated Large Bore Closure Study
NCT06851481
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will be a retrospective single center review of 200 patients undergoing endovascular procedures utilizing vascular access within a severely diseased CFA between 2018 and 2020 at Yale New Haven Hospital. A random selection of patients undergoing hemostasis with manual compression (n = 100) and VASCADE vascular closure system (n = 100) will be conducted. The two groups will then be statistically compared with respect to 48-hour and 30-day safety and efficacy outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
manual compression cohort
Manual compression cohort: Patients who underwent coronary or peripheral angiograms via CFA access with moderate to severe stenosis were hemostasis was achieved via manual compression
No interventions assigned to this group
VASCADE cohort
VASCADE cohort: Patients who underwent coronary or peripheral angiograms via CFA access with moderate to severe stenosis were hemostasis was achieved via VASCADE device closure
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. ACT \< 300 seconds
3. Age 18 - 90 years old
4. Severe common femoral arterial disease Percent stenosis \> 50, which will be core-lab adjudicated
Exclusion Criteria
2. Prior ipsilateral closure device use, other than VASCADE
3. High bleeding risk ACT \> 300 or \> 250 with IIb/IIIa inhibitor Plt \< 50K INR \> 1.7 on the day of procedure Inherent coagulopathy NOAC, warfarin, or lovenox administered within 24 hours of the procedure
4. Suspected intraluminal thrombus, dissection, pseudoaneurysm, hematoma, or AV Fistula
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yale University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carlos Mena-Hurtado, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yale University
Kim Smolderen
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Yale University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bangalore S, Bhatt DL. Femoral arterial access and closure. Circulation. 2011 Aug 2;124(5):e147-56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.032235. No abstract available.
Noori VJ, Eldrup-Jorgensen J. A systematic review of vascular closure devices for femoral artery puncture sites. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Sep;68(3):887-899. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
Arora N, Matheny ME, Sepke C, Resnic FS. A propensity analysis of the risk of vascular complications after cardiac catheterization procedures with the use of vascular closure devices. Am Heart J. 2007 Apr;153(4):606-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.12.014.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2000028947
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.