Translation and Validation of the FS-ICU-24R Into Danish
NCT ID: NCT07087132
Last Updated: 2025-07-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
250 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-04-01
2025-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
At least 250 relatives of patients, who have been admitted to the intensive care unit at least 24 hours will be included. Relatives will be recruited, when the patients discharge is coming close, i.e. within days. All included relatives will receive the questionnaire on e-mail one month after they registered for the study. Participants will be prompted twice, if they not respond.
After completing the questionnaire once, participants will be asked to complete it a second time after 14 days. The aim is to include at least 50 relatives in this group.
To understand if the questionnaire is measuring family satisfaction, the study will compare the answers to FS-ICU-24R with a score of 1-10 of General satisfaction with the patients care, General satisfaction with information and General satisfaction with decision making. Stability over time will be assessed by comparing responses between first and second time, participants fill out the questionnaire.
Participation will be voluntary and all participants will recieve written and oral information before registering for the study. The participants will register for the study by entering their e-mail into a secure on-line platform.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Post ICU Follow up: A Questionnaire Survey of Aftercare in Denmark
NCT02784574
Longitudinal Prospective Study in a Mixed ICU Population
NCT03714230
Recovery After ICU Treatment: A Prospective Cohort Study
NCT02599428
Patient Reported Symptoms the First Week After Intensive Care Unit Discharge and up to Hospital Discharge
NCT05266118
The Post-ICU Pain Study
NCT07180407
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Face and content validity: The Danish version will be presented to 4-6 relatives, who will be interviewed about their perceptions and understanding of the questionnaire. Following the administration of the instrument, all relatives will be interviewed. For each item, relatives will be asked to describe in their own words what they think the item is about and how they chose their answer. Furthermore, if an item is difficult to understand or ambiguous, relatives will be asked to provide alternative wording. Notes and comments made during the interviews on the questionnaire items will be discussed by the researchers before a final version of the questionnaire will be produced. One of the original authors, Dr. Daren Heyland, will approve of the final back translation.
Psychometric testing of FS-ICU-24R in a prospective cohort of Danish ICU relatives:
Recruitment procedure: Relatives will be informed in person about the study while in the ICU. If relatives agree to participate, they must register for the study using a smartphone and a QR code. If a participant prefers to complete the questionnaire on paper, a package containing the questionnaire, information about the study and a return envelope will be supplied with instructions on when to fill in the questionnaire and how to return it. The site will only need to register how many packages have been distributed.
Recruitment of participants to the subgroup test-re-test analysis: When completing the questionnaire in REDCap relatives will be asked to participate a second time for a test-re-test analysis.
Sample size: The reseach group aim to include at least 250 relatives. Several family members from the same family may be included. For criterion and construct validation it is recommended to include more than 100 patients. For confirmatory factor analysis, it is recommended to include 4-10 respondents per item. As the SF-ICU-24R has 26 items and 3 items for bereaved relatives only, at least 250 relatives must be included. Although relatives of the same patient may have some shared experiences, a validation study of the EuroQ2 instrument, which contains many of the same questions, showed that identical ratings only occurred in 28-59% of families. This study supports that relatives' experiences from the same patient trajectory can be surprisingly different. A subgroup of at least 50 relatives will be invited to complete the questionnaire a second time to explore test-retest validity.
Data: In the beginning of the questionnaire, participants will be asked to rate their overall emotional wellbeing, overall satisfaction with care, overall satisfaction with information and overall satisfaction with decision making on Likert scales 1-10 (1= worst imaginable, 10=best imaginable). P participants will then complete the Danish version of the FS-ICU-24R. After each section (satisfaction with care, satisfaction with information, satisfaction with decision making, and bereavement), the participants will be able to make comment in free text. Finally, the participants will be asked to provide background information on sex, age, education, and relationship with the patient.
Data collection: The questionnaire will be distributed by email through the secure web application REDCap hosted by Aarhus University and all data will be stored in REDCap at Aarhus University. For participants preferring to respond in paper, the study group will manually enter mailed responses into REDCap. Paper questionnaires will be coded to identify the issuing ICU.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Relatives of ICU patients
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aarhus University Hospital
OTHER
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Hospitalsenheden Vest
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anne Højager Nielsen
Head of Research
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, , Denmark
Gødstrup Hospital
Herning, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wall RJ, Engelberg RA, Downey L, Heyland DK, Curtis JR. Refinement, scoring, and validation of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU) survey. Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):271-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251122.15053.50.
Jensen HI, Downey L, Koopmans M, Curtis JR, Engelberg RA, Gerritsen RT. Family ratings of ICU care. Is there concordance within families? J Crit Care. 2020 Feb;55:108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
Harrison DA, Ferrando-Vivas P, Wright SE, McColl E, Heyland DK, Rowan KM; Family-Reported Experiences Evaluation Study Investigators. Psychometric assessment of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit questionnaire in the United Kingdom. J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:346-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.023. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O'Neal L, McLeod L, Delacqua G, Delacqua F, Kirby J, Duda SN; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
De Vet, H. C., Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Knol, D. L. (2011). Measurement in medicine : a practical guide. Cambridge University Press.
Cha ES, Kim KH, Erlen JA. Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: issues and techniques. J Adv Nurs. 2007 May;58(4):386-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x. Epub 2007 Apr 17.
Nielsen AH, Agard AS, Collet MO, Brix LD. Translation and Validation of the Canadian ICU Family Satisfaction Questionnaire (FS-ICU-24R) to Danish-A Protocol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Oct;69(9):e70123. doi: 10.1111/aas.70123.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1-16-02-51-24
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.