Follow up After Intensive Care. The FUTstudy

NCT ID: NCT02077244

Last Updated: 2019-01-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

224 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-31

Study Completion Date

2017-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To investigate the effect of nurse led follow up talks to prevent posttraumatic stress (PTS) symptoms and improve quality of life and sence of coherence after an intensive care unit (ICU) stay.

Secondly:

Investigate level of psychological distress, quality of life, hope and work participation in ICU patients after an ICU stay and factors associated with these outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The ICU patient experiences total dependence on health care professionals and technical devices. Some patients report unpleasant memories such as pain, feeling helpless, or delusional experiences from the ICU stay and many report physical or mental symptoms after discharge from the ICU. Return to work rate after ICU treatment differs. Most ICU patients receive analgesics and sedatives to relieve pain and discomfort during the stay. Thus many patients have few memories from their time being critically ill. For patients with few memories from the ICU stay this represents an interruption in the patient's life history. Since personal identity is influenced by the stories we tell about ourselves, loss of memory from a period with critical illness might be experienced as a threat towards self-confidence and sense of coherence. Some patients with traumatic memories from the ICU develop PTS symptoms after discharge.

In order to help the earlier ICU patient to achieve a life with less physical and mental complaints, some ICUs have established a follow up program in outpatient clinics after discharge from hospital, but there is sparse evidence of the effectiveness of this intervention, and what type of follow up that best help the patients.

The primary aim of the study is to:

Investigate if a group of previous intensive care patients receiving nurse led follow up talks three times after discharge from the ICU have less post traumatic stress symptoms, pain, increased sense of coherence and, work participation and health related quality of life (HRQL) three, six and twelve months after discharge from the ICU compared to a control group receiving standard care.

Secondary aim:

Investigate level and predictors of anxiety, depression, PTS symptoms, hope, pain, HRQOL and work participation in intensive care patients ICU patients first year after discharge from ICU.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post Traumatic Stress Symptoms Post ICU Patient

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Those who give their written informed consent will fill out the Post Traumatic Stress Scale 10 Intensive care screen (PTSS 10-I) Patients with a score equal or above 25 (indicating suffering from PTS symptoms) will be randomized to intervention or control group. Randomization will be performed using the computer program WebCRFNTNU. Patients who score below 25 will be included in an observation group and receive questionnaires at the same time points as the intervention and control group.

To be able to detect a difference of 10 between the groups as significant with 80% power and allow for 20% dropout, a total of 250 patients with PTS-10 score like or above 25 have to be included in the randomized part of the study. In the autum 2016 a new statistician in the procject recalculated the power and found the need for 134 randomized patients. The inclusion was then terminated.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Follow up talks

Patients with a score like or above 25 on Post traumatic stress scale-10 Intensive Care Screen after discharge from the ICU. Nurse led follow up talks at the ward and one and two months later.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Follow up talks

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Nurse led follow up talks at the ward and one and two months later.

No talks

Patients with a score like or above 25 on Post traumatic stress scale-10 Intensive Care Screen after discharge from the ICU. Care as usual

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Observation group

Patients with a score below 25 on Post traumatic stress scale-10 Intensive Care Screen after discharge from the ICU. Care as usual.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Follow up talks

Nurse led follow up talks at the ward and one and two months later.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients with an ICU stay like or above 24 hours who speak and understand Norwegian and who are conscious and cognitively oriented at the time of inclusion. Patients with a score of 25 or more on Post Traumatic Stress Scale 10 (PTSS-10) is randomized to intervention or control group. Patients with a score below 25 on PTSS-10 is included in an observation group.

Exclusion Criteria

* severe psychiatric disorder
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Oslo University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kirsti Tøien

PhD post doctor fellow

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Oslo University Hospital

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012/1715

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

MICU Recovery Clinic
NCT02560129 COMPLETED