Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
224 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-03-31
2017-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Secondly:
Investigate level of psychological distress, quality of life, hope and work participation in ICU patients after an ICU stay and factors associated with these outcomes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pilot Feasibility Study of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial on a Follow-Up Bundle of Care for ICU Survivors and Caregivers
NCT06681649
Study in Intensive Care Follow-up Programme in Improving Long-term Outcomes of ICU Survivors
NCT01796509
ICU Follow-up After Prolonged Intensive Care Stay
NCT04186468
Web-based Follow-up to Former ICU Patients
NCT04317144
Recovery After ICU Treatment: A Prospective Cohort Study
NCT02599428
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In order to help the earlier ICU patient to achieve a life with less physical and mental complaints, some ICUs have established a follow up program in outpatient clinics after discharge from hospital, but there is sparse evidence of the effectiveness of this intervention, and what type of follow up that best help the patients.
The primary aim of the study is to:
Investigate if a group of previous intensive care patients receiving nurse led follow up talks three times after discharge from the ICU have less post traumatic stress symptoms, pain, increased sense of coherence and, work participation and health related quality of life (HRQL) three, six and twelve months after discharge from the ICU compared to a control group receiving standard care.
Secondary aim:
Investigate level and predictors of anxiety, depression, PTS symptoms, hope, pain, HRQOL and work participation in intensive care patients ICU patients first year after discharge from ICU.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
To be able to detect a difference of 10 between the groups as significant with 80% power and allow for 20% dropout, a total of 250 patients with PTS-10 score like or above 25 have to be included in the randomized part of the study. In the autum 2016 a new statistician in the procject recalculated the power and found the need for 134 randomized patients. The inclusion was then terminated.
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Follow up talks
Patients with a score like or above 25 on Post traumatic stress scale-10 Intensive Care Screen after discharge from the ICU. Nurse led follow up talks at the ward and one and two months later.
Follow up talks
Nurse led follow up talks at the ward and one and two months later.
No talks
Patients with a score like or above 25 on Post traumatic stress scale-10 Intensive Care Screen after discharge from the ICU. Care as usual
No interventions assigned to this group
Observation group
Patients with a score below 25 on Post traumatic stress scale-10 Intensive Care Screen after discharge from the ICU. Care as usual.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Follow up talks
Nurse led follow up talks at the ward and one and two months later.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oslo University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kirsti Tøien
PhD post doctor fellow
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Oslo University Hospital
Oslo, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2012/1715
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.