Comparison Between Laser and Open Fistula Surgeries in the Management of Fistula - In - Ano

NCT ID: NCT07083778

Last Updated: 2025-07-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-01

Study Completion Date

2025-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective randomized controlled trial compared the outcomes of laser versus open surgical techniques in the management of fistula-in-ano among 100 patients at a tertiary care center. Patients were diagnosed with intersphincteric or transsphincteric fistulas using clinical examination and MR fistulogram and were randomly assigned to undergo either laser surgery (n=50) or open surgery (n=50).

The primary endpoints included postoperative pain, hospital stay duration, and time to return to normal activity. Secondary outcomes assessed were recurrence, wound infection, incontinence, need for reoperation, and patient satisfaction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group interventional clinical trial conducted at GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, aimed at comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of laser surgery using the FiLaC (Fistula Laser Closure) technique versus conventional open surgical procedures (fistulotomy or fistulectomy) in the management of fistula-in-ano.

A total of 100 adult patients (\>18 years), with a confirmed diagnosis of intersphincteric or transsphincteric fistula-in-ano based on clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance (MR) fistulogram, were enrolled. Following informed consent and screening, patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two arms:

Group A (Laser Surgery Group): Underwent minimally invasive FiLaC procedure using a 1470 nm diode laser and radial fiber probe for endofistular ablation.

Group B (Open Surgery Group): Underwent traditional open surgical procedures including fistulotomy, fistulectomy, or LIFT (Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract), depending on fistula anatomy.

All surgeries were performed under spinal anesthesia. Postoperative care was standardized across both groups. Patients were followed for a minimum of 3 months with structured clinical assessments at regular intervals.

Primary outcome measures included:

Postoperative pain (VAS score within 7 days)

Duration of hospital stay

Time to resume normal daily activity

Secondary outcomes evaluated were:

Recurrence rate at 3 months

Complete healing within 3 months (closure of both internal and external openings, cessation of discharge)

Anal incontinence rate

Anal stenosis rate

The study intends to assess whether the laser approach offers a meaningful improvement in postoperative morbidity, patient comfort, and quality of life, while also examining risk factors associated with poor surgical outcomes or recurrence.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

FISTULA IN ANO

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of laser ablation (FiLaC technique) versus conventional open surgical techniques (fistulotomy/fistulectomy) in patients diagnosed with intersphincteric or transsphincteric fistula-in-ano.

Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either laser surgery or open surgery after evaluation through clinical examination and MR fistulogram. Both groups were managed as per standard operative protocols and followed up for a period of three months.

The study assessed both clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes, including postoperative pain (VAS score), duration of hospital stay, time to resume daily activities, healing rate, recurrence, postoperative complications (like incontinence, wound infection), and overall patient satisfaction.

This model evaluates the utility of a minimally invasive sphincter-preserving laser technique in comparison to the tradition
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental - Laser Surgery Group

Patients randomized to this arm will undergo laser ablation of the fistula tract using a radial fiber laser probe (e.g., FiLaC technique). The procedure is performed under spinal or general anesthesia. The internal opening is closed, and laser energy (10W in pulsed mode) is delivered circumferentially along the fistula tract to ablate it.

All patients will receive standard perioperative care, including IV antibiotics preoperatively and oral antibiotics postoperatively.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Laser Fistula Surgery (FiLaC - Fistula-tract Laser Closure)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A minimally invasive procedure using a radial fiber diode laser probe to ablate the fistula tract. Laser energy (10W in pulsed mode) is applied circumferentially as the probe is slowly withdrawn, leading to shrinkage and closure of the fistula tract. The internal opening is closed with absorbable sutures. The procedure is done under spinal or general anesthesia.

Active Comparator - Open Surgery Group

Patients randomized to this arm will undergo standard open surgery (fistulotomy or fistulectomy or LIFT ), depending on the anatomy of the fistula. The tract will be laid open or excised under spinal anesthesia. Wounds will be left to heal by secondary intention.

Standard postoperative care includes oral antibiotics, analgesia, sitz baths, and regular dressings.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Open Fistula Surgery (Fistulotomy, Fistulectomy, or LIFT Procedure)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients in this group will undergo standard open surgical treatment for fistula-in-ano. Based on the type and location of the fistula (intersphincteric or transsphincteric), the surgical procedure may be:

* Fistulotomy: Laying open the fistula tract.
* Fistulectomy: Excision of the entire fistulous tract.
* LIFT Procedure: Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract, preserving the sphincter complex. This sphincter-sparing technique is chosen for transsphincteric fistulas when appropriate.

All procedures are performed under spinal anesthesia. The choice of technique is individualized based on MR fistulogram findings and intraoperative assessment. Wounds are managed with regular dressings and allowed to heal by secondary intention. Standard postoperative care includes antibiotics, analgesia, and sitz baths. Follow-up is done at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laser Fistula Surgery (FiLaC - Fistula-tract Laser Closure)

A minimally invasive procedure using a radial fiber diode laser probe to ablate the fistula tract. Laser energy (10W in pulsed mode) is applied circumferentially as the probe is slowly withdrawn, leading to shrinkage and closure of the fistula tract. The internal opening is closed with absorbable sutures. The procedure is done under spinal or general anesthesia.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open Fistula Surgery (Fistulotomy, Fistulectomy, or LIFT Procedure)

Patients in this group will undergo standard open surgical treatment for fistula-in-ano. Based on the type and location of the fistula (intersphincteric or transsphincteric), the surgical procedure may be:

* Fistulotomy: Laying open the fistula tract.
* Fistulectomy: Excision of the entire fistulous tract.
* LIFT Procedure: Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract, preserving the sphincter complex. This sphincter-sparing technique is chosen for transsphincteric fistulas when appropriate.

All procedures are performed under spinal anesthesia. The choice of technique is individualized based on MR fistulogram findings and intraoperative assessment. Wounds are managed with regular dressings and allowed to heal by secondary intention. Standard postoperative care includes antibiotics, analgesia, and sitz baths. Follow-up is done at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* • Patient with intersphincter \& transphincter fistula in ano as confirmed by clinical examination followed by MR fistulogram.

* Age 18 to 65 years
* Non responders and Recurrent Patient giving written informed consent of selected fistula surgery and having awareness about alternative procedures.

Exclusion Criteria

* • Pregnant women

* Patients of fistula in ano associated with other conditions(HIV, tubercular disease, IBD, Ca rectum.)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GSVM Medical College

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kamal raj

Junior Resident , Department of general Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kamal Raj, MS surgery

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

GSVM MEDICAL COLLEGE , KANPUR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kamal Raj

Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Patel KR, Jauhari RK, Shukla P. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laser Versus Open Surgical Approaches in the Management of Fistula-in-Ano at a Tertiary Care Center. Cureus. 2025 Aug 19;17(8):e90471. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90471. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40978994 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GSVM-FIA-RCT-2025-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PRP Use in Treatment of Fistula Ano
NCT04187651 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA