The Effect of Health Education Conducted Using Two Different Methods on Women's Knowledge of Breast Cancer, Health Beliefs, Mammography Self-Efficacy, and Participation in Screening Programs
NCT ID: NCT07083310
Last Updated: 2025-07-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
78 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-07-31
2025-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study looks at two ways of teaching women about breast cancer and mammogram screening: traditional health education and a counseling approach called motivational interviewing. Motivational interviewing helps women feel more confident and motivated to get screened by talking about their concerns and encouraging positive decisions.
The goal is to see which method better increases women's knowledge about breast cancer, their beliefs about health, their confidence in getting mammograms, and their actual participation in screening programs. The results will help improve how we support women in taking care of their breast health.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Breast Cancer Prevention Journey Program
NCT06395896
Early Detection of Breast Cancer Among Syrian Women
NCT07056686
Patient Perception of Mammogram Guidelines
NCT01267877
Health Belief Model-Based Survey on Breast Self-Examination Awareness and Practice Among Community-Dwelling Middle-Aged and Older Women
NCT07149636
Evaluation of an Online Intervention to Educate Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer on How to Help Reduce Their Risk.
NCT07120087
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Early diagnosis of breast cancer is the most important factor in increasing survival rates. Delays in early diagnosis increase mortality and morbidity, reduce treatment success, and lower quality of life. The World Health Organization strongly recommends community-based screening programs including mammography for breast cancer control. Mammography is a proven, effective, and reliable method for early detection of breast cancer. Literature reports that increased participation in mammography screening significantly reduces advanced-stage breast cancer cases and mortality. Mammography screening is conducted free of charge every two years for women aged 40-69 within Turkey's National Breast Cancer Screening Program, as in many developed and developing countries worldwide.
The most effective strategy to combat breast cancer threatening women's health is to screen at least 70% of the at-risk female population every two years by mammography. Participation rates in mammography vary between 7% and 84% across different regions. In Northern Europe, Denmark, Finland, and the Netherlands report participation rates of 84.1%, 82.8%, and 80.8%, respectively. In Southern Europe, Italy reports 61.3%, Latin America's Brazil between 12-31%, and Malaysia in Asia between 7-25%. In Turkey, despite free mammography services, participation ranges between 41-55%, which is below the desired level. Therefore, especially in developing and less developed countries, implementing evidence-based, supportive, and encouraging interventions accepted by the general population is recommended to increase mammography participation.
Meeting women's information needs regarding breast cancer and screening, positively influencing health beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors, and improving mammography self-efficacy are key factors in increasing participation. Factors negatively impacting participation include limited access to screening, fear of examination, low risk perception, lack of knowledge, and negative attitudes and beliefs about screening. Even though women may be aware of early breast cancer detection, low education levels, poor self-efficacy, and lack of motivation contribute to low screening participation. The literature recommends various methods to motivate women and remove perceived barriers to mammography screening. In Turkey, face-to-face interventions, home visits, and various educational methods and tools have increased mammography participation to varying degrees. Studies show that face-to-face and online counseling about breast cancer and early detection raise women's knowledge and motivation, improve health beliefs and attitudes, increase perceived benefits and self-efficacy, decrease perceived barriers, and consequently increase mammography participation. However, despite various health education interventions improving knowledge, awareness, and positive attitudes, participation rates rarely exceed 70%. Thus, raising knowledge and awareness alone is insufficient, and increasing motivation for screening behavior is essential.
Motivational interviewing (MI) is often used to encourage desired health behaviors. MI is a client-centered approach that helps individuals recognize ambivalence, make informed decisions, and resolve issues by enhancing motivation for positive health behaviors. MI consists of four stages: engaging, focusing, evoking, and planning. These aim to stimulate motivation for change, strengthen belief in change, support sustainability, and develop concrete plans for behavior change. MI has been shown to increase mammography participation. For example, a nurse navigation program including MI significantly increased mammography participation among Syrian refugee women. A randomized controlled trial with 120 Iranian women reported that MI counseling positively affected breast cancer screening behaviors, though mammography participation increased only to 26%. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses indicate that MI interventions may increase participation in breast cancer screening programs. However, no study in Turkish populations has investigated the effect of MI on mammography participation. Furthermore, randomized controlled trials on MI and breast cancer screening participation remain limited in quantity and quality, highlighting the need for well-designed, adequately powered, standardized MI trials. Additionally, no study has compared traditional health education with MI-based education on participation rates in breast cancer screening programs.
Therefore, well-designed randomized controlled trials comparing traditional health education and MI-based health education on women's breast cancer knowledge, health beliefs, mammography self-efficacy, and screening participation are needed.
This study aims to evaluate the effects of health education and motivational interviewing-based health education on women's breast cancer knowledge, health beliefs, mammography self-efficacy, and participation in screening programs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Health Education Group
Participants will receive structured education sessions focused on increasing knowledge about breast cancer, risk factors, and the importance of early screening.
Health Education
Structured group education focused on breast cancer awareness, risk reduction, and early detection.
Motivational Interviewing Group
Participants will engage in one-on-one counseling sessions using motivational interviewing techniques to enhance motivation and reduce barriers to mammography screening.
Motivational Interviewing
Individual counseling sessions using motivational interviewing to enhance screening behavior.
Control Group
Participants will not receive any intervention during the study period.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Health Education
Structured group education focused on breast cancer awareness, risk reduction, and early detection.
Motivational Interviewing
Individual counseling sessions using motivational interviewing to enhance screening behavior.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Being a woman aged between 40 and 69 years
Being literate
Registered at the Family Health Center where the study is conducted
Exclusion Criteria
Having had a mammogram in the last two years and/or regularly
Having been diagnosed with any type of cancer
Being pregnant
Being in the postpartum period
Having a physical communication impairment (e.g., hearing, speech)
Having a diagnosis of neuropsychiatric illness
40 Years
69 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip Fakultesi
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Serpil Ă–zdemir
Associate Professor
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
00004646
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.