Evaluation of the Role of Immune Checkpoints in Response to Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Therapy

NCT ID: NCT05519397

Last Updated: 2023-09-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-01

Study Completion Date

2022-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women and the second most common cause of death after lung cancer. In epidemiological studies, its prevalence is 22-26%, and the mortality risk due to breast cancer is around 18%.

It is known that the immune system has an important role in tumor development or tumor destruction. Recent studies have shown that tumor cells acquire escape mechanisms to escape host immunity in the tumor microenvironment.

Studies have reported that immune checkpoints are elevated in many types of cancer and have a poor prognosis. Up or down regulation of immune checkpoints is observed to protect breast cancer cells from the anti-tumor responses of the immune system. There are also immune checkpoints found in plasma in soluble form, and the number of studies evaluating soluble immune checkpoints in cancers is very limited in the literature. Measurement of soluble immune control points is easier than those expressed on the surface, and many markers can be evaluated at the same time. There are very few studies in the literature evaluating soluble immune checkpoints in breast cancer.

The aim of this study is to investigate the role of soluble immune checkpoints in predicting the response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced breast cancers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women and the second most common cause of death after lung cancer. In epidemiological studies, its prevalence is 22-26%, and the mortality risk due to breast cancer is around 18%. While the classification of malignant breast tumors has traditionally been made according to their histological appearance, some subtypes have been defined according to their molecular features. The different behavior of tumors in the luminal group led to the need to divide this group into subtypes as luminal A and B. The luminal group A, which has the highest prevalence among breast cancers; It includes Her2-negative tumors with low proliferative activity, low mitotic rate and histological grade. The prognosis of patients with luminal A tumors is very good and metastases are mostly limited to bones. Luminal-B tumors have a more aggressive course. The most important difference of this group is that tumors have a high proliferation rate. The breakpoint between luminal A and B is generally accepted as less than 14% of tumor cells showing nuclear Ki67 expression immunohistochemically. In addition, approximately 30% of Her2-positive tumors are immunohistochemically in the luminal B phenotype.

It is known that the immune system has an important role in tumor development or tumor destruction. Recent studies have shown that tumor cells acquire escape mechanisms to escape host immunity in the tumor microenvironment.

Immune checkpoints are important molecules that are on the agenda especially after receiving the Nobel Prize in 2018 and in revealing the relationship between cancer and the immune system. Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand, PD-L1, are immune checkpoints that act by inhibiting T cell receptor signal transmission and auxiliary stimuli. T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3 (TIM-3) are mostly expressed on interferon-γ producing T cells, Tregs, dendritic cells, B cells, macrophages, natural killer cells (NK) and mast cells.

Studies have reported that immune checkpoints are elevated in many types of cancer and have a poor prognosis. Up or down regulation of immune checkpoints is observed to protect breast cancer cells from the anti-tumor responses of the immune system. Although many studies have been conducted on immune checkpoints in recent years, a limited number of immune checkpoints which are expressed on the cell surface have been evaluated in each study. There are also immune checkpoints found in plasma in soluble form, and the number of studies evaluating soluble immune checkpoints in cancers is very limited in the literature. Measurement of soluble immune control points is easier than those expressed on the surface, and many markers can be evaluated at the same time. There are very few studies in the literature evaluating soluble immune checkpoints in breast cancer.

The aim of this study is to investigate the role of soluble immune checkpoints in predicting the response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced breast cancers.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No response

The breast cancer patients with no response to neoadjuvant therapy

Immune checkpoint measurement

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Measurement of sCD25 (IL-2Ra), 4-1BB, B7.2 (CD86), Free Active TGF-β1, CTLA-4, PD-L1, PD-1, Tim-3, LAG-3, Galectin-9

Moderate response

The breast cancer patients with moderate response to neoadjuvant therapy

Immune checkpoint measurement

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Measurement of sCD25 (IL-2Ra), 4-1BB, B7.2 (CD86), Free Active TGF-β1, CTLA-4, PD-L1, PD-1, Tim-3, LAG-3, Galectin-9

Good response

The breast cancer patients with good response to neoadjuvant therapy

Immune checkpoint measurement

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Measurement of sCD25 (IL-2Ra), 4-1BB, B7.2 (CD86), Free Active TGF-β1, CTLA-4, PD-L1, PD-1, Tim-3, LAG-3, Galectin-9

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Immune checkpoint measurement

Measurement of sCD25 (IL-2Ra), 4-1BB, B7.2 (CD86), Free Active TGF-β1, CTLA-4, PD-L1, PD-1, Tim-3, LAG-3, Galectin-9

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Locally advanced Breast Cancer patients who will receive neoadjuvant therapy

Exclusion Criteria

* Known immunodeficiency
* Having a primary malignancy other than breast cancer,
* Pregnancy,
* Patients who refused to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

88 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Istanbul Training and Research Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ufuk Oguz Idiz

Assoc. Prof. MD. PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ufuk Oguz Idiz, Assoc. Prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Istanbul Training and Research Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istanbul Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gu D, Ao X, Yang Y, Chen Z, Xu X. Soluble immune checkpoints in cancer: production, function and biological significance. J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Nov 27;6(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0449-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30482248 (View on PubMed)

Li Y, Cui X, Yang YJ, Chen QQ, Zhong L, Zhang T, Cai RL, Miao JY, Yu SC, Zhang F. Serum sPD-1 and sPD-L1 as Biomarkers for Evaluating the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients. Clin Breast Cancer. 2019 Oct;19(5):326-332.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31176611 (View on PubMed)

Gershtein ES, Korotkova EA, Vorotnikov IK, Sokolov NY, Ermilova VD, Mochalova AS, Kushlinskii NE. Soluble forms of PD-1/PD-L immune checkpoint receptor and ligand in blood serum of breast cancer patients: association with clinical pathologic factors and molecular type of the tumor. Klin Lab Diagn. 2022 Feb 23;67(2):76-80. doi: 10.51620/0869-2084-2022-67-2-76-80.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35192751 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Breast cancer neoadjuvant

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.