Immun Checkpoint Washout in Patients With Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT07003009
Last Updated: 2025-06-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-01
2025-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Role of Immune Checkpoints in Response to Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Therapy
NCT05519397
Relationship Between Breast Cancer Subtypes and Immune Checkpoints
NCT05460702
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy to Assess Axillary Lymph Nodes in Women With Stage I or Stage II Breast Cancer
NCT00005821
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy With Hybrid Technique in Breast Cancer
NCT04274946
Internal Mammary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer Patients With Clinically Axillary Node -Positive
NCT01668914
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Invasive ductal carcinoma is the most frequently observed type among invasive breast cancers (80%) and is also defined as invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type. Macroscopic or microscopic axillary lymph node metastases have been detected in up to 25% of screening-diagnosed cases and up to 60% of symptomatic cases of invasive ductal carcinoma.
The clinical staging of breast cancer is primarily determined by the physical examination of the breast skin, breast tissue, and regional lymph nodes (axillary, supraclavicular, and internal mammary). However, the accuracy of clinically determining axillary lymph node metastases is only 33%. Proper lymph node staging in breast cancer patients is crucial for both prognosis and treatment.
Ultrasound is significantly more sensitive than physical examination alone in determining axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer staging. For lymph nodes that remain indeterminate or suspicious on ultrasound, fine-needle aspiration biopsy or core biopsy provides a definitive diagnosis. The most commonly used staging system is the TNM staging system. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) recently modified the TNM system. According to the latest TNM staging, the presence of macrometastases in ipsilateral level 1 and level 2 axillary lymph nodes classifies breast cancer as stage 2A or higher. Although biopsy sampling has a high diagnostic accuracy, it requires experienced pathologists, and the evaluation process can take weeks. Therefore, there is a need for faster and more cost-effective diagnostic methods for detecting axillary metastases.
The lymph node washout technique is used to determine lymph node metastasis in malignancies such as papillary thyroid carcinoma, the most common type of thyroid cancer. Papillary thyroid carcinomas generally do not exhibit aggressive clinical behavior and have favorable long-term prognoses. However, at the time of diagnosis, cervical and mediastinal lymph node involvement ranges from 27% to 46%, and the postoperative recurrence rate is between 3% and 30%. Thus, determining preoperative lymph node involvement and distinguishing it from benign reactive lymphadenitis is essential. For this purpose, fine-needle aspiration with thyroglobulin washout sampling has recently become widely used worldwide. In patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma, fine-needle aspiration of cervical lymph nodes and testing for thyroglobulin, a protein normally present in thyroid tissue, is considered one of the most reliable methods for detecting lymph node metastasis. A large-scale study by Moon et al. found that fine-needle aspiration thyroglobulin washout had a sensitivity of 93.2% and a specificity of 95.9% in detecting lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Immune checkpoints have gained attention, particularly after being awarded the Nobel Prize in 2018, as they play a crucial role in understanding the relationship between cancer and the immune system. PD-1 and its ligand PD-L1 function as immune checkpoints by inhibiting T-cell receptor signaling and co-stimulatory signals. T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3 (TIM-3) is expressed on interferon-γ-producing T cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), dendritic cells, B cells, macrophages, natural killer (NK) cells, and mast cells. Dysregulation of TIM-3 expression has been linked to autoimmune diseases. High TIM-3 expression is associated with T-cell exhaustion and suppression of T-cell responses, particularly in chronic viral infections and tumor development. The clinical success of immune checkpoint inhibitors such as ipilimumab and nivolumab in melanoma and lung cancer has further increased interest in immune checkpoints.
Numerous studies in the literature have investigated the expression of immune checkpoints such as PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 on the cell surface in breast cancer patients. One study evaluating the genetic expression of immune checkpoints in breast cancer found a negative correlation between B7-H3 mRNA expression and survival, while a positive correlation was observed between survival and the expression of CTLA-4 and tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domain (TIGIT). Another study reported decreased Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) expression in triple-negative breast cancer and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancers.
Natural soluble forms of immune checkpoint receptors and ligands also exist in body fluids and play a role in immune regulation, although their exact mechanisms remain unclear. Many studies are investigating the role of immune checkpoints in cancer patients. One study evaluated both tumor-associated and soluble levels of PD-L1 and CTLA-4 in the blood, finding that elevated levels of PD-L1 and CTLA-4 were associated with poor prognosis. There are five studies in the literature, including one report, evaluating soluble immune checkpoints in breast cancer patients.
Since immune checkpoints are present on the cell surface and in soluble form in blood and body fluids, they are also highly likely to be found in tumor-metastasized regions. In the literature there is no study using these immunological markers to determine metastasis in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma and metastatic axillary lymph nodes.
In this study, the investigators will evaluate the soluble levels of immune checkpoints commonly associated with cancer-sCD25 (IL-2Ra), 4-1BB, B7.2 (CD86), Free Active Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, CTLA-4, PD-L1, PD-1, Tim-3, LAG-3, and Galectin-9-in washout fluid samples obtained from metastatic axillary lymph nodes and benign lymph nodes in patients with invasive ductal breast carcinoma. The effectiveness of immune checkpoints and the washout technique in diagnosing lymphatic metastasis will be assessed as a rapid diagnostic method.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Metastatic axillary lymph nodes suspected
Malign Lymph Node Washout
During routine axillary lymph node sampling, which is performed as part of standard staging using imaging methods, a washout sample (which is not not routinely applied ) will be obtained by injecting 1 cc of 0.9% saline into axillary lymph nodes suspected to be metastatic. The aspirated washout sample will be placed in a biochemistry gel tube labeled as Sample 1.
Benign lymph nodes
Benign Lymph Node Washout
Description: During the biopsy performed to histopathologically confirm the benign nature of a radiologically presumed benign axillary lymph node, a washout sampling will also be conducted by injecting 1 cc of 0.9% saline into benign lymph node. The aspirated washout sample will be placed in a biochemistry gel tube labeled as Sample 2.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Malign Lymph Node Washout
During routine axillary lymph node sampling, which is performed as part of standard staging using imaging methods, a washout sample (which is not not routinely applied ) will be obtained by injecting 1 cc of 0.9% saline into axillary lymph nodes suspected to be metastatic. The aspirated washout sample will be placed in a biochemistry gel tube labeled as Sample 1.
Benign Lymph Node Washout
Description: During the biopsy performed to histopathologically confirm the benign nature of a radiologically presumed benign axillary lymph node, a washout sampling will also be conducted by injecting 1 cc of 0.9% saline into benign lymph node. The aspirated washout sample will be placed in a biochemistry gel tube labeled as Sample 2.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who will have neoadjuvant therapy
Exclusion Criteria
* The FNAB result of the presumed healthy lymph node is malignant.
* They refuse to participate in the study.
* They have another primary malignancy.
* They are pregnant.
* They have a history of immunodeficiency.
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istanbul Training and Research Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ufuk Oguz Idiz
Chief of General Surgery, Principal Investigator, Clinical Associate professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Istanbul Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB, Mittendorf EA, Rugo HS, Solin LJ, Weaver DL, Winchester DJ, Hortobagyi GN. Breast Cancer-Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jul 8;67(4):290-303. doi: 10.3322/caac.21393. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
Moon JH, Kim YI, Lim JA, Choi HS, Cho SW, Kim KW, Park HJ, Paeng JC, Park YJ, Yi KH, Park DJ, Kim SE, Chung JK. Thyroglobulin in washout fluid from lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy in papillary thyroid cancer: large-scale validation of the cutoff value to determine malignancy and evaluation of discrepant results. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Mar;98(3):1061-8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3291. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
Sallout L, Tashkandi M, Moqnas A, AlMajed H, Al-Naeem A, Alwelaie Y. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of axillary lymph nodes: A reliable diagnostic tool for breast cancer staging. Cancer Cytopathol. 2024 Feb;132(2):103-108. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22770. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Breast lymph node
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.