Axillary Staging in Node Positive Breast Cancer Patients Receiving PST. SNB vs PET/MRI

NCT ID: NCT04826211

Last Updated: 2025-08-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

109 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-11-04

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The management of axillary nodes in breast cancer patients is a highly debated and evolving field. To date, an increasing number of patients with positive lymph nodes receives primary systemic therapy (PST) prior to surgery leading to down-staging axillary nodes in about 40% of women. However, the available diagnostic methods have several limitations in properly evaluating the response after treatment both in the breast and in the nodes and might lead to either under or over-treatment in these patients. Fully integrated scanners capable of simultaneous acquisition of PET and MRI have now been developed, with the potential to combine the specificity obtained by the functional imaging of PET, with the superior sensitivity of MRI, to provide higher diagnostic accuracy.

It is expected that PET/MRI could better determine the response after PST to distinguish patients with negative versus patients with positive axillary nodes after medical treatment. As the excision of axillary nodes has mainly a staging purpose, the reliable identification of node negative patients might eventually spare women from unnecessary surgery. An accurate over-time and final imaging work-up might help choose the appropriate type of surgery according to the extent of nodal involvement: either SNB or complete axillary clearance.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

HYPOTHESIS: Hybrid PET/MRI might be a non-invasive, one-stage, operator-independent imaging modality to accurately define nodal status after PST, properly select type of surgical approach and might eventually lead to the omission of axillar surgery in some breast cancer patients showing complete imaging response.

AIMS: The primary endpoint is to compare the staging power between SNB (or lymphoadenectomy) vs PET/MRI in detecting axillary lymph node macro-metastases (\>2 mm).Additionally the PET/MRI and A-US results will be confronted and ultimately related to pathology result, calculating the concordance rate in terms of positive vs negative nodes and number of positive nodes detected by each method. The staging power of both preoperative exams will be evaluated by considering how many times the results from PET/MRI or A-US could have indicated the most appropriate axillary treatment according to pathological findings.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with breast cancer of any size with positive axillary nodes and candidates to PST will undergo PET/MRI prior to PST.

The study population will then be split into two groups:

* women with positive axillary lymph nodes after PST (Group 1, 60% of the total)
* women with negative axillary lymph nodes after PST (Group 2, 40% of the total).

A total of 110 women will guarantee two well-powered independent analysis. one for Group 1 (n=66; power\>90%; Type I error rate of 0.05) and one for Group 2 (n=44; power\>80%; Type I error rate of 0.05).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Female Node-positive Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Node positive BC patients undergoing PST

Patients with breast cancer of any size with positive axillary nodes and candidates to PST will undergo PET/MRI both prior to PST and after PST before surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PET/MRI

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

All included patients will undergo PET/MRI both prior to PST and prior to surgery. In order to analyze results the population will be divided into two groups: women with positive axillary lymph nodes after PST (Group 1) and women with negative axillary lymph nodes after PST (Group 2).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PET/MRI

All included patients will undergo PET/MRI both prior to PST and prior to surgery. In order to analyze results the population will be divided into two groups: women with positive axillary lymph nodes after PST (Group 1) and women with negative axillary lymph nodes after PST (Group 2).

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Signed informed consent;
* Age \> 18 years;
* Proven diagnosis of early BC of any size;
* Patients candidate to primary systemic therapy (PST);
* Positive axillary nodes at diagnosis, confirmed by either citology or histology confirmation. Patients with clear overt clinical and radiological nodal involvement might be enrolled as well without FNA or microhystology

Exclusion Criteria

* inflammatory BC;
* pregnancy;
* contraindication to PET;
* distant metastases;
* no surgery after PST;
* contraindication to MRI;
* claustrophobia;
* allergy to the MR contrast agent;
* severe renal insufficiency.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondazione C.N.R./Regione Toscana "G. Monasterio", Pisa, Italy

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

IRCCS San Raffaele

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Oreste Davide Gentilini

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

GENTILINI

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

IRCCS San Raffaele

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ospedale San Raffaele

Milan, MI, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Taneja S, Jena A, Goel R, Sarin R, Kaul S. Simultaneous whole-body (1)(8)F-FDG PET-MRI in primary staging of breast cancer: a pilot study. Eur J Radiol. 2014 Dec;83(12):2231-2239. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Sep 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25282709 (View on PubMed)

Melsaether AN, Raad RA, Pujara AC, Ponzo FD, Pysarenko KM, Jhaveri K, Babb JS, Sigmund EE, Kim SG, Moy LA. Comparison of Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/MR Imaging and Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/CT in Terms of Lesion Detection and Radiation Dose in Patients with Breast Cancer. Radiology. 2016 Oct;281(1):193-202. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016151155. Epub 2016 Mar 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27023002 (View on PubMed)

Veronesi U, De Cicco C, Galimberti VE, Fernandez JR, Rotmensz N, Viale G, Spano G, Luini A, Intra M, Veronesi P, Berrettini A, Paganelli G. A comparative study on the value of FDG-PET and sentinel node biopsy to identify occult axillary metastases. Ann Oncol. 2007 Mar;18(3):473-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl425. Epub 2006 Dec 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17164229 (View on PubMed)

Gentilini O, Veronesi U. Staging the Axilla in Early Breast Cancer: Will Imaging Replace Surgery? JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1031-2. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2337. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26291922 (View on PubMed)

van Nijnatten TJA, Goorts B, Voo S, de Boer M, Kooreman LFS, Heuts EM, Wildberger JE, Mottaghy FM, Lobbes MBI, Smidt ML. Added value of dedicated axillary hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI for improved axillary nodal staging in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients: a feasibility study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Feb;45(2):179-186. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3823-0. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28905091 (View on PubMed)

Heusch P, Nensa F, Schaarschmidt B, Sivanesapillai R, Beiderwellen K, Gomez B, Kohler J, Reis H, Ruhlmann V, Buchbender C. Diagnostic accuracy of whole-body PET/MRI and whole-body PET/CT for TNM staging in oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Jan;42(1):42-8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2885-5. Epub 2014 Aug 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25112399 (View on PubMed)

Stadnik TW, Everaert H, Makkat S, Sacre R, Lamote J, Bourgain C. Breast imaging. Preoperative breast cancer staging: comparison of USPIO-enhanced MR imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDC) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for axillary lymph node staging--initial findings. Eur Radiol. 2006 Oct;16(10):2153-60. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0276-4. Epub 2006 May 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16670863 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SNB vs PET/MRI 1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.