Axillary Staging in Node Positive Breast Cancer Patients Receiving PST. SNB vs PET/MRI
NCT ID: NCT04826211
Last Updated: 2025-08-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
109 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-04
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It is expected that PET/MRI could better determine the response after PST to distinguish patients with negative versus patients with positive axillary nodes after medical treatment. As the excision of axillary nodes has mainly a staging purpose, the reliable identification of node negative patients might eventually spare women from unnecessary surgery. An accurate over-time and final imaging work-up might help choose the appropriate type of surgery according to the extent of nodal involvement: either SNB or complete axillary clearance.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Axillary Staging in Early Breast Cancer: SNB vs PET/MRI
NCT04829643
Sentinel Node Biopsy Vs Observation After Axillary PET
NCT04072653
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy With or Without Para-Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer
NCT02651142
Axillary Radiotherapy for Early Stage Breast Cancer With Limited Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes
NCT02612012
Multimodal Imaging Evaluation System of Axillary Lymph Node Staging and Treatment Strategy for Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Therapy
NCT04661436
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
AIMS: The primary endpoint is to compare the staging power between SNB (or lymphoadenectomy) vs PET/MRI in detecting axillary lymph node macro-metastases (\>2 mm).Additionally the PET/MRI and A-US results will be confronted and ultimately related to pathology result, calculating the concordance rate in terms of positive vs negative nodes and number of positive nodes detected by each method. The staging power of both preoperative exams will be evaluated by considering how many times the results from PET/MRI or A-US could have indicated the most appropriate axillary treatment according to pathological findings.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with breast cancer of any size with positive axillary nodes and candidates to PST will undergo PET/MRI prior to PST.
The study population will then be split into two groups:
* women with positive axillary lymph nodes after PST (Group 1, 60% of the total)
* women with negative axillary lymph nodes after PST (Group 2, 40% of the total).
A total of 110 women will guarantee two well-powered independent analysis. one for Group 1 (n=66; power\>90%; Type I error rate of 0.05) and one for Group 2 (n=44; power\>80%; Type I error rate of 0.05).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Node positive BC patients undergoing PST
Patients with breast cancer of any size with positive axillary nodes and candidates to PST will undergo PET/MRI both prior to PST and after PST before surgery
PET/MRI
All included patients will undergo PET/MRI both prior to PST and prior to surgery. In order to analyze results the population will be divided into two groups: women with positive axillary lymph nodes after PST (Group 1) and women with negative axillary lymph nodes after PST (Group 2).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PET/MRI
All included patients will undergo PET/MRI both prior to PST and prior to surgery. In order to analyze results the population will be divided into two groups: women with positive axillary lymph nodes after PST (Group 1) and women with negative axillary lymph nodes after PST (Group 2).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age \> 18 years;
* Proven diagnosis of early BC of any size;
* Patients candidate to primary systemic therapy (PST);
* Positive axillary nodes at diagnosis, confirmed by either citology or histology confirmation. Patients with clear overt clinical and radiological nodal involvement might be enrolled as well without FNA or microhystology
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnancy;
* contraindication to PET;
* distant metastases;
* no surgery after PST;
* contraindication to MRI;
* claustrophobia;
* allergy to the MR contrast agent;
* severe renal insufficiency.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione C.N.R./Regione Toscana "G. Monasterio", Pisa, Italy
OTHER_GOV
IRCCS San Raffaele
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Oreste Davide Gentilini
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
GENTILINI
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IRCCS San Raffaele
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan, MI, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Taneja S, Jena A, Goel R, Sarin R, Kaul S. Simultaneous whole-body (1)(8)F-FDG PET-MRI in primary staging of breast cancer: a pilot study. Eur J Radiol. 2014 Dec;83(12):2231-2239. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
Melsaether AN, Raad RA, Pujara AC, Ponzo FD, Pysarenko KM, Jhaveri K, Babb JS, Sigmund EE, Kim SG, Moy LA. Comparison of Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/MR Imaging and Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/CT in Terms of Lesion Detection and Radiation Dose in Patients with Breast Cancer. Radiology. 2016 Oct;281(1):193-202. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016151155. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
Veronesi U, De Cicco C, Galimberti VE, Fernandez JR, Rotmensz N, Viale G, Spano G, Luini A, Intra M, Veronesi P, Berrettini A, Paganelli G. A comparative study on the value of FDG-PET and sentinel node biopsy to identify occult axillary metastases. Ann Oncol. 2007 Mar;18(3):473-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl425. Epub 2006 Dec 12.
Gentilini O, Veronesi U. Staging the Axilla in Early Breast Cancer: Will Imaging Replace Surgery? JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1031-2. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2337. No abstract available.
van Nijnatten TJA, Goorts B, Voo S, de Boer M, Kooreman LFS, Heuts EM, Wildberger JE, Mottaghy FM, Lobbes MBI, Smidt ML. Added value of dedicated axillary hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI for improved axillary nodal staging in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients: a feasibility study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Feb;45(2):179-186. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3823-0. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
Heusch P, Nensa F, Schaarschmidt B, Sivanesapillai R, Beiderwellen K, Gomez B, Kohler J, Reis H, Ruhlmann V, Buchbender C. Diagnostic accuracy of whole-body PET/MRI and whole-body PET/CT for TNM staging in oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Jan;42(1):42-8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2885-5. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
Stadnik TW, Everaert H, Makkat S, Sacre R, Lamote J, Bourgain C. Breast imaging. Preoperative breast cancer staging: comparison of USPIO-enhanced MR imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDC) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for axillary lymph node staging--initial findings. Eur Radiol. 2006 Oct;16(10):2153-60. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0276-4. Epub 2006 May 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SNB vs PET/MRI 1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.