Evaluation of Different Imaging Modalities in Regional Lymph Nodes Staging in Patients With Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT06185946
Last Updated: 2023-12-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-01-01
2025-01-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1\) Age 2 )Sex 3)Family history of breast cancer 4)Menopausal status 5 )Body mass index (BMI) 6) Histological type of BC as reported in pathology 7) The results of the lymph node status. 8)Registered data will be collected from the hospital databases and clinical sheers. 3 9) The gold standard reference in the evaluation of suspicious lymph nodes by nodal biopsy and postoperative pathology. Imaging technique and interpretation The imaging diagnostic for BC (MRI, CT, mammography, and ultrasound) patients are carried out by the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology of the Hospitals in the research and interpreted by radiologists at the time of BC diagnosis. The radiological reports for each patient and each imaging technique will be analyzed about the lymph node status. The nodal status will be reported as benign, indeterminate, and infiltrated as stated by the ACR lexicon. Mammography and US For mammography, we will use full-field digital mammography systems with the option of additional tomosynthesis for further characterization of the primary tumor at NCI with the commercially available The BC patients routinely receive an ultrasound exam including the evaluation of the breast and the axilla with the lymphatic drainage pathways as a part of the follow-up process active lymph nodes. p values lower than 0.05 will be considered significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ultrasonography group
No interventions assigned to this group
mammoragraphy group
patient with ultrasoundy only
No interventions assigned to this group
CT group
pateint with postive node undergo further staging
No interventions assigned to this group
MRI group
patient whit postive node with staging
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients who can tolerate the imaging modalities and have proven to tolerate the contrast agents . 3) Breast cancer patients coming for an initial assessment with or without clinical regional lymph nodes positive status.
4\) Breast cancer patients planned to have(breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy)as well as lymph node surgeries(sentinel lymph node v biopsy and/or axillary lymph node dissection.
Exclusion Criteria
\-
25 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mennatallah Arous Mohamed
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mennatallah Arous Mohamed
assistant lecteurer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Cancer Institute
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Mennatallahh A Taha, assistant lecturer
Role: CONTACT
Phone: 00201005074579
Email: [email protected]
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Mennatallahh Taha
Role: primary
amira h radwan
Role: backup
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Al-Hattali S, Vinnicombe SJ, Gowdh NM, Evans A, Armstrong S, Adamson D, Purdie CA, Macaskill EJ. Breast MRI and tumour biology predict axillary lymph node response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Cancer Imaging. 2019 Dec 26;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40644-019-0279-4.
Bakker MF, de Lange SV, Pijnappel RM, Mann RM, Peeters PHM, Monninkhof EM, Emaus MJ, Loo CE, Bisschops RHC, Lobbes MBI, de Jong MDF, Duvivier KM, Veltman J, Karssemeijer N, de Koning HJ, van Diest PJ, Mali WPTM, van den Bosch MAAJ, Veldhuis WB, van Gils CH; DENSE Trial Study Group. Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue. N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 28;381(22):2091-2102. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903986.
Caudle AS, Yang WT, Krishnamurthy S, Mittendorf EA, Black DM, Gilcrease MZ, Bedrosian I, Hobbs BP, DeSnyder SM, Hwang RF, Adrada BE, Shaitelman SF, Chavez-MacGregor M, Smith BD, Candelaria RP, Babiera GV, Dogan BE, Santiago L, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM. Improved Axillary Evaluation Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Using Selective Evaluation of Clipped Nodes: Implementation of Targeted Axillary Dissection. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 1;34(10):1072-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.0094. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
Cetin IA, Akay SU, Caglar Ozkok HB, Sengoz M. Lymph node ratio as an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer-related mortality in patients with node-positive breast cancer. J Cancer Res Ther. 2020 Oct-Dec;16(6):1387-1392. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_1034_19.
Choi HY, Park M, Seo M, Song E, Shin SY, Sohn YM. Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Evaluation in Breast Cancer: Current Issues and Literature Review. Ultrasound Q. 2017 Mar;33(1):6-14. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000277.
de Meric de Bellefon M, Lemanski C, Ducteil A, Fenoglietto P, Azria D, Bourgier C. Management of the Axilla in the Era of Breast Cancer Heterogeneity. Front Oncol. 2018 Apr 4;8:84. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00084. eCollection 2018.
Diessner J, Anders L, Herbert S, Kiesel M, Bley T, Schlaiss T, Sauer S, Wockel A, Bartmann C. Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul;149(7):3457-3467. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04221-9. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
Ditsch N, Untch M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Jackisch C, Krug D, Friedrich M, Janni W, Muller V, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Diel I, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Gerber B, Gluz O, Hanf V, Harbeck N, Heil J, Huober J, Kreipe HH, Kuhn T, Kummel S, Loibl S, Luftner D, Lux M, Maass N, Moebus V, Mundhenke C, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Witzel I, Wockel A, Thill M. AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2020. Breast Care (Basel). 2020 Jun;15(3):294-309. doi: 10.1159/000508736. Epub 2020 Jun 10. No abstract available.
Dong Y, Feng Q, Yang W, Lu Z, Deng C, Zhang L, Lian Z, Liu J, Luo X, Pei S, Mo X, Huang W, Liang C, Zhang B, Zhang S. Preoperative prediction of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer based on radiomics of T2-weighted fat-suppression and diffusion-weighted MRI. Eur Radiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):582-591. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5005-7. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
El Sabbagh YH, Hamdy O. Targeted Axillary Dissection In Breast Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Therapy. Mansoura Medical Journal. 2022 Dec 1;51(4):246-57.
Johnston SRD, Harbeck N, Hegg R, Toi M, Martin M, Shao ZM, Zhang QY, Martinez Rodriguez JL, Campone M, Hamilton E, Sohn J, Guarneri V, Okada M, Boyle F, Neven P, Cortes J, Huober J, Wardley A, Tolaney SM, Cicin I, Smith IC, Frenzel M, Headley D, Wei R, San Antonio B, Hulstijn M, Cox J, O'Shaughnessy J, Rastogi P; monarchE Committee Members and Investigators. Abemaciclib Combined With Endocrine Therapy for the Adjuvant Treatment of HR+, HER2-, Node-Positive, High-Risk, Early Breast Cancer (monarchE). J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 1;38(34):3987-3998. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02514. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
Kutomi G, Ohmura T, Satomi F, Takamaru T, Shima H, Suzuki Y, Otokozawa S, Zembutsu H, Mori M, Hirata K. Lymph node shape in computed tomography imaging as a predictor for axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer. Exp Ther Med. 2014 Aug;8(2):681-685. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.1787. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
Lee SC, Jain PA, Jethwa SC, Tripathy D, Yamashita MW. Radiologist's role in breast cancer staging: providing key information for clinicians. Radiographics. 2014 Mar-Apr;34(2):330-42. doi: 10.1148/rg.342135071.
Marino MA, Avendano D, Zapata P, Riedl CC, Pinker K. Lymph Node Imaging in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer: Concurrent Diagnostic Tools. Oncologist. 2020 Feb;25(2):e231-e242. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0427. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
Masuda N, Lee SJ, Ohtani S, Im YH, Lee ES, Yokota I, Kuroi K, Im SA, Park BW, Kim SB, Yanagita Y, Ohno S, Takao S, Aogi K, Iwata H, Jeong J, Kim A, Park KH, Sasano H, Ohashi Y, Toi M. Adjuvant Capecitabine for Breast Cancer after Preoperative Chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 1;376(22):2147-2159. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612645.
Shirzadi A, Mahmoodzadeh H, Qorbani M. Assessment of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in two subgroups: Initially node negative and node positive converted to node negative - A systemic review and meta-analysis. J Res Med Sci. 2019 Feb 25;24:18. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_127_18. eCollection 2019.
Telli ML, Gradishar WJ, Ward JH. NCCN Guidelines Updates: Breast Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 May 1;17(5.5):552-555. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.5006.
von Minckwitz G, Huang CS, Mano MS, Loibl S, Mamounas EP, Untch M, Wolmark N, Rastogi P, Schneeweiss A, Redondo A, Fischer HH, Jacot W, Conlin AK, Arce-Salinas C, Wapnir IL, Jackisch C, DiGiovanna MP, Fasching PA, Crown JP, Wulfing P, Shao Z, Rota Caremoli E, Wu H, Lam LH, Tesarowski D, Smitt M, Douthwaite H, Singel SM, Geyer CE Jr; KATHERINE Investigators. Trastuzumab Emtansine for Residual Invasive HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):617-628. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814017. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Soh_med_23_11_02MD
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id