Accuracy of Fitting Surface of Orbital Prosthesis Constructed by Photogrammetry Scan

NCT ID: NCT07078162

Last Updated: 2025-07-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

7 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-23

Study Completion Date

2025-06-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Two orbital prosthesis were made to the patient , using two different digital scanning methods to restore the unilateral orbital exentration , the prosthetic devices were made using medical silicon material

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Statement of problem : Orbital defects which resulted from surgical removal of mucormycosis that caused by corona virus infection lead to several functional, esthetic and psychological problems for the patients.

Aim of the study : Evaluation of the accuracy of fitting surface of orbital prosthesis constructed by photogrammetry scan.

Methods : An orbital prosthesis was made using photogrammetry scanning technique as a method for making digital facial impression to obtain facial 3D model using a high resolution professional camera with image processed through 3DF Zephyr open-source software and the other orbital prosthesis was made using a conventional impression for both the defect and contralateral healthy eye , then scanned with a Degree Of Freedom (DOF) extra oral desktop scanner. 3D models of the defect sites were printed from each scanning method to act as a master cast for the orbital prosthesis fabrication. Accuracy of orbital prosthesis fitting surfaces produced from the two techniques in comparison with a facial scan as a reference scan was assessed through deviation analysis using metrology grade software (Geomagic Control X ).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Orbital Deformity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1- photogrammetry scan to the defect and healthy sites

Capture photographs of the face including the defective site by profesional camera

Group Type OTHER

Photogramety Orbital Prosthesis

Intervention Type OTHER

Using 2D photographs to abtain 3D model of orbital defect anatomy

2- Digital scan of a conventional impression to the defect and healthy sites

Digital scan of a conventional impression to the defect and healthy sites, the impression was taken using silicone rubber impression material, to obtain 3D virtual model using an extraoral desktop scanner.

Group Type OTHER

Conventional impression prosthesis

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional impression to an orbital defect then scaning the impression using desktop scanner

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Photogramety Orbital Prosthesis

Using 2D photographs to abtain 3D model of orbital defect anatomy

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional impression prosthesis

Conventional impression to an orbital defect then scaning the impression using desktop scanner

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with Unilateral orbital defect.
2. Complete healing of the defect site with no open wound.
3. At least 1 year passed after the last chemo or radiotherapy dose in patients who receiving this type of treatment

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient under chemo or radiotherapy due to presence of active tumor.
2. Patient with unhealed
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tanta University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Asmaa Abd Allah Hassan Hashish

Principal Investigator (Teaching Assistant in Prosthdontic Department)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Dentistry Tanta University

Tanta, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2950729

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Orbital prosthesis

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.