Accuracy of Fitting Surface of Orbital Prosthesis Constructed by Photogrammetry Scan
NCT ID: NCT07078162
Last Updated: 2025-07-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
7 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-23
2025-06-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pattern Recognition Prosthetic Control
NCT04272593
Accuracy of Photogrammetric Three-Dimensional Facial Models Reconstruction Compared With Direct Anthropometry
NCT06897852
Pattern Recognition Prosthetic Control
NCT04272489
Development of a Simulation Tool for Upper Extremity Prostheses
NCT01622530
Photogrammetry Analysis in the Assessment of Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders Risk Among Physical Therapists
NCT06984016
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim of the study : Evaluation of the accuracy of fitting surface of orbital prosthesis constructed by photogrammetry scan.
Methods : An orbital prosthesis was made using photogrammetry scanning technique as a method for making digital facial impression to obtain facial 3D model using a high resolution professional camera with image processed through 3DF Zephyr open-source software and the other orbital prosthesis was made using a conventional impression for both the defect and contralateral healthy eye , then scanned with a Degree Of Freedom (DOF) extra oral desktop scanner. 3D models of the defect sites were printed from each scanning method to act as a master cast for the orbital prosthesis fabrication. Accuracy of orbital prosthesis fitting surfaces produced from the two techniques in comparison with a facial scan as a reference scan was assessed through deviation analysis using metrology grade software (Geomagic Control X ).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1- photogrammetry scan to the defect and healthy sites
Capture photographs of the face including the defective site by profesional camera
Photogramety Orbital Prosthesis
Using 2D photographs to abtain 3D model of orbital defect anatomy
2- Digital scan of a conventional impression to the defect and healthy sites
Digital scan of a conventional impression to the defect and healthy sites, the impression was taken using silicone rubber impression material, to obtain 3D virtual model using an extraoral desktop scanner.
Conventional impression prosthesis
Conventional impression to an orbital defect then scaning the impression using desktop scanner
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Photogramety Orbital Prosthesis
Using 2D photographs to abtain 3D model of orbital defect anatomy
Conventional impression prosthesis
Conventional impression to an orbital defect then scaning the impression using desktop scanner
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Complete healing of the defect site with no open wound.
3. At least 1 year passed after the last chemo or radiotherapy dose in patients who receiving this type of treatment
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient with unhealed
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tanta University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Asmaa Abd Allah Hassan Hashish
Principal Investigator (Teaching Assistant in Prosthdontic Department)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dentistry Tanta University
Tanta, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2950729
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Orbital prosthesis
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.