Accuracy of Photogrammetric Three-Dimensional Facial Models Reconstruction Compared With Direct Anthropometry
NCT ID: NCT06897852
Last Updated: 2025-03-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-09-01
2025-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Precision of 3 Dimensional Facial Analysis Using Bellus 3D Face Camera Pro Versus Planmeca ProMax 3D Proface: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study
NCT04511598
Frontal/Axial and Self Body Image In Scoliosis
NCT07166328
Clinical Evaluation of Re-treatment of Cleft Lip and Nasal Deformation in Patients With Post Repair Deformities
NCT07348185
Physical Activity on Eye Hand Coordination Post Strabismus Surgery
NCT06759792
Outcome of Facial Palsy Following Rehabilitation
NCT04215562
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Direct facial anthropometry group
No interventions assigned to this group
first photogrammetric software group
No interventions assigned to this group
second photogrammetric software group
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
1. Extensive facial hair (beards).
2. Significant facial defects.
3. Surgical scars.
4. Neuromuscular disorders that may hinder stability of head during image acquisition.
5. Accessories that could interfere with image acquisition.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Al-Azhar University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Assem Hammas
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bradley E, Shelton A, Hodge T, Morris D, Bekker H, Fletcher S, Barber S. Patient-reported experience and outcomes from orthodontic treatment. J Orthod. 2020 Jun;47(2):107-115. doi: 10.1177/1465312520904377. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
Sarver DM. Interactions of hard tissues, soft tissues, and growth over time, and their impact on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Sep;148(3):380-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.030.
Mohan A, Sivakumar A, Nalabothu P. Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of OneCeph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis-a cross-sectional study. BDJ Open. 2021 Jun 17;7(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s41405-021-00077-2.
Kamburoglu K. Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistry. World J Radiol. 2015 Jun 28;7(6):128-30. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i6.128.
Jain S, Choudhary K, Nagi R, Shukla S, Kaur N, Grover D. New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: Combining digital technologies. Imaging Sci Dent. 2019 Sep;49(3):179-190. doi: 10.5624/isd.2019.49.3.179. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
Mao WY, Lei J, Lim LZ, Gao Y, Tyndall DA, Fu K. Comparison of radiographical characteristics and diagnostic accuracy of intraosseous jaw lesions on panoramic radiographs and CBCT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Feb 1;50(2):20200165. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200165. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
Struck R, Cordoni S, Aliotta S, Perez-Pachon L, Groning F. Application of Photogrammetry in Biomedical Science. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1120:121-130. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-06070-1_10.
Heike CL, Upson K, Stuhaug E, Weinberg SM. 3D digital stereophotogrammetry: a practical guide to facial image acquisition. Head Face Med. 2010 Jul 28;6:18. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-6-18.
Erten O, Yilmaz BN. Three-Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics. Turk J Orthod. 2018 Sep;31(3):86-94. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17041. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
D'Ettorre G, Farronato M, Candida E, Quinzi V, Grippaudo C. A comparison between stereophotogrammetry and smartphone structured light technology for three-dimensional face scanning. Angle Orthod. 2022 May 1;92(3):358-363. doi: 10.2319/040921-290.1.
12- Arapovic-Savic M, Savic M, Umicevic-Davidovic M, Arbutina A, Nedeljkovic N, Glisic B. A novel method of photogrammetry measurements of study models in orthodontics. Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo. 2019;147(1):10-6.
Gupta A. On imaging modalities for cephalometric analysis: a review. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2023 Mar 21:1-22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AlAzharU-AZUD
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.