Pulsed Field Ablation vs. Cryoballoon Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

NCT ID: NCT07064616

Last Updated: 2025-08-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-25

Study Completion Date

2028-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical study is being conducted to compare two different treatment methods for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), a common heart rhythm disorder. Atrial fibrillation occurs when the upper chambers of the heart (the atria) beat rapidly and irregularly. This can lead to symptoms like palpitations, shortness of breath, or fatigue, and it increases the risk of stroke or heart failure.

Persistent atrial fibrillation means that the irregular heart rhythm continues and does not stop on its own. Treatment often includes a procedure called catheter ablation, where special instruments are used to create small scars in the heart to block the abnormal electrical signals causing the arrhythmia.

Currently, two main types of catheter ablation are used in Japan:

Cryoballoon Ablation: A technique that uses extreme cold to create scars and isolate the pulmonary veins, which are often the source of the irregular signals.

Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA): A newer technique that uses very short bursts of electrical energy to target the heart tissue, with the aim of reducing damage to surrounding structures.

While pulsed field ablation has been introduced in Japan recently and seems to be safe, there is limited data about how well it works compared to cryoballoon ablation, especially in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. This study aims to find out whether pulsed field ablation is as effective and safe as cryoballoon ablation for treating persistent AF.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pulsed-Filed Ablation (PFA) group

The PFA group includes persistent AF patients treated with PFA

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Catheter ablation using pulsed field ablation

Intervention Type DEVICE

PulseSelect™ Pulsed Field Ablation System:

This intervention uses the PulseSelect™ system to perform pulsed field ablation (PFA) for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. PFA delivers short, high-voltage electrical pulses that selectively affect myocardial cells while minimizing damage to surrounding tissues such as the esophagus or phrenic nerve. This technique is designed to reduce procedural complications and improve safety compared to traditional thermal ablation methods.

Cryoballoon (CBA) group

The CBA group includes persistent AF patients treated with CBA

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Catheter ablation using cryoballoon ablation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Cryoballoon Ablation:

This intervention uses a cryoballoon catheter to perform pulmonary vein isolation by freezing tissue around the pulmonary veins. The balloon delivers extreme cold temperatures to create transmural lesions that block abnormal electrical signals responsible for atrial fibrillation. Cryoballoon ablation is widely used and considered effective for atrial fibrillation treatment but may carry risks related to collateral tissue injury.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Catheter ablation using pulsed field ablation

PulseSelect™ Pulsed Field Ablation System:

This intervention uses the PulseSelect™ system to perform pulsed field ablation (PFA) for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. PFA delivers short, high-voltage electrical pulses that selectively affect myocardial cells while minimizing damage to surrounding tissues such as the esophagus or phrenic nerve. This technique is designed to reduce procedural complications and improve safety compared to traditional thermal ablation methods.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Catheter ablation using cryoballoon ablation

Cryoballoon Ablation:

This intervention uses a cryoballoon catheter to perform pulmonary vein isolation by freezing tissue around the pulmonary veins. The balloon delivers extreme cold temperatures to create transmural lesions that block abnormal electrical signals responsible for atrial fibrillation. Cryoballoon ablation is widely used and considered effective for atrial fibrillation treatment but may carry risks related to collateral tissue injury.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 18 and 85 years
* Diagnosed with PeAF (lasting less than one year or requiring cardioversion)
* Eligible for catheter ablation according to current Japanese guidelines
* Provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Paroxysmal or long-standing persistent AF (duration \>1 year)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nerima Hikarigaoka Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kitasato University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hidehira Fukaya

Junior Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kitasato University School of Medicine

Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Japan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hidehira Fukaya, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+81-778-8111 ext. 2064

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Hidehira Fukaya, MD, PhD.

Role: primary

+81-778-8111 ext. 2064

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

C24-157

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Optimal Ablation Strategies for Persistent AF With HF
NCT07153718 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA