Pulsed Field Ablation vs. Cryoballoon Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
NCT ID: NCT07064616
Last Updated: 2025-08-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-06-25
2028-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Persistent atrial fibrillation means that the irregular heart rhythm continues and does not stop on its own. Treatment often includes a procedure called catheter ablation, where special instruments are used to create small scars in the heart to block the abnormal electrical signals causing the arrhythmia.
Currently, two main types of catheter ablation are used in Japan:
Cryoballoon Ablation: A technique that uses extreme cold to create scars and isolate the pulmonary veins, which are often the source of the irregular signals.
Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA): A newer technique that uses very short bursts of electrical energy to target the heart tissue, with the aim of reducing damage to surrounding structures.
While pulsed field ablation has been introduced in Japan recently and seems to be safe, there is limited data about how well it works compared to cryoballoon ablation, especially in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. This study aims to find out whether pulsed field ablation is as effective and safe as cryoballoon ablation for treating persistent AF.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation Plus Argon Beam Coagulator Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
NCT02424110
Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Device Comparison Study
NCT00466973
Comparison Between Extended Cryoablation, Standard Cryoablation, and Radiofrequency Ablation
NCT07034378
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Cryoballoon Ablation
NCT02166723
Comparison of Different Ablation Surgeries on Left Atrial Reverse Remodeling in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
NCT06307860
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pulsed-Filed Ablation (PFA) group
The PFA group includes persistent AF patients treated with PFA
Catheter ablation using pulsed field ablation
PulseSelect™ Pulsed Field Ablation System:
This intervention uses the PulseSelect™ system to perform pulsed field ablation (PFA) for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. PFA delivers short, high-voltage electrical pulses that selectively affect myocardial cells while minimizing damage to surrounding tissues such as the esophagus or phrenic nerve. This technique is designed to reduce procedural complications and improve safety compared to traditional thermal ablation methods.
Cryoballoon (CBA) group
The CBA group includes persistent AF patients treated with CBA
Catheter ablation using cryoballoon ablation
Cryoballoon Ablation:
This intervention uses a cryoballoon catheter to perform pulmonary vein isolation by freezing tissue around the pulmonary veins. The balloon delivers extreme cold temperatures to create transmural lesions that block abnormal electrical signals responsible for atrial fibrillation. Cryoballoon ablation is widely used and considered effective for atrial fibrillation treatment but may carry risks related to collateral tissue injury.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Catheter ablation using pulsed field ablation
PulseSelect™ Pulsed Field Ablation System:
This intervention uses the PulseSelect™ system to perform pulsed field ablation (PFA) for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. PFA delivers short, high-voltage electrical pulses that selectively affect myocardial cells while minimizing damage to surrounding tissues such as the esophagus or phrenic nerve. This technique is designed to reduce procedural complications and improve safety compared to traditional thermal ablation methods.
Catheter ablation using cryoballoon ablation
Cryoballoon Ablation:
This intervention uses a cryoballoon catheter to perform pulmonary vein isolation by freezing tissue around the pulmonary veins. The balloon delivers extreme cold temperatures to create transmural lesions that block abnormal electrical signals responsible for atrial fibrillation. Cryoballoon ablation is widely used and considered effective for atrial fibrillation treatment but may carry risks related to collateral tissue injury.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosed with PeAF (lasting less than one year or requiring cardioversion)
* Eligible for catheter ablation according to current Japanese guidelines
* Provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nerima Hikarigaoka Hospital
UNKNOWN
Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital
UNKNOWN
Kitasato University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hidehira Fukaya
Junior Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kitasato University School of Medicine
Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
C24-157
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.