Resorbable vs Non-resorbable Bone Substitute at Immediate Post-extractive Single Implants
NCT ID: NCT07047131
Last Updated: 2025-07-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE3
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-12-18
2030-12-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The goal is to see which one better preserves bone and improves appearance around the implant.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Extraction Socket Augmentation. A Clinical Study
NCT06378112
mp3 vs Apatos in Post-extractive Sockets
NCT02644070
Bone Material's Histomorphometric Analysis In Socket Preservation
NCT06740110
Comparison of Straumann Bone Ceramic and Bio-Oss With Guided Tissue Regeneration for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT00900718
Comparison of Post Tooth Extraction Healing Using Different Xenograft Materials
NCT03149172
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Eligible patients are adults requiring a single-tooth extraction in the maxilla or mandible, followed by immediate implant placement.
The primary outcome is peri-implant bone volume changes over time, assessed using CBCT scans.
Secondary outcomes include implant and crown failure, implant stability, marginal bone level changes on periapical radiographs, and aesthetic outcomes evaluated using the pink esthetic score based on clinical photographs.
Patients will be followed up to 5 years after loading.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Resorbable Bone Substitute (GTO®)
Patients receive a fully resorbable bone substitute (GTO®) to fill the gap between the implant and the buccal bone wall during immediate post-extraction implant placement.
GTO® (fully resorbable bone substitute)
Collagenated heterologous cortico-cancellous porcine bone mix + thermogelling copolymer with collagen (GTO®, OsteoBiol®, Tecnoss®)
Partially Resorbable Bone Substitute (Apatos®)
Patients receive a partially resorbable bone substitute (Apatos®) to fill the gap between the implant and the buccal bone wall during immediate post-extraction implant placement.
Apatos® (partially resorbable bone substitute)
Porcine cortical bone granules (Apatos Cortical®, OsteoBiol®, Tecnoss®) stabilized with TSV Gel®, a thermogelling copolymer with collagen.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GTO® (fully resorbable bone substitute)
Collagenated heterologous cortico-cancellous porcine bone mix + thermogelling copolymer with collagen (GTO®, OsteoBiol®, Tecnoss®)
Apatos® (partially resorbable bone substitute)
Porcine cortical bone granules (Apatos Cortical®, OsteoBiol®, Tecnoss®) stabilized with TSV Gel®, a thermogelling copolymer with collagen.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least 18 year old, able to understand and to sign an informed consent
* There must be sufficient bone to allow the placement of at least a 3.5 mm diameter and 8.5 mm long implant.
* After tooth extraction there must be a potential gap of at least 2 mm from the buccal inner bone plate and the implant surface.
Exclusion Criteria
* Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients.
* Patients irradiated in the head and/or neck.
* Uncontrolled diabetes.
* Pregnancy or lactation.
* Active periodontal disease
* Poor oral hygiene and motivation.
* Addiction to alcohol or drugs.
* Psychiatric problems and/or unrealistic expectations
* Patients with an acute infection (abscess) in the site intended for implant placement.
* Patients unable to commit to a 5-year follow-up.
* Patients treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.
* patients referred only for implant placement if follow-ups cannot be done at treatment centre.
* Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol could not be fully adhered to. In case of doubts please contact the study coordinator.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Marco Esposito
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marco Esposito
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marco Esposito, Dentistry
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
King Juan Carlos University
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.
Thalmair T, Fickl S, Schneider D, Hinze M, Wachtel H. Dimensional alterations of extraction sites after different alveolar ridge preservation techniques - a volumetric study. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jul;40(7):721-7. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12111. Epub 2013 May 5.
De Angelis N, Felice P, Pellegrino G, Camurati A, Gambino P, Esposito M. Guided bone regeneration with and without a bone substitute at single post-extractive implants: 1-year post-loading results from a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011 Winter;4(4):313-25.
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Polyzos IP, Felice P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate, immediate-delayed and delayed implants). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8;2010(9):CD005968. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005968.pub3.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2301201902319
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.